考虑模型不确定性的预应力锚固长度设计阻力模型的概率校正

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Sergio Belluco, Flora Faleschini
{"title":"考虑模型不确定性的预应力锚固长度设计阻力模型的概率校正","authors":"Sergio Belluco,&nbsp;Flora Faleschini","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the reliability and the model uncertainty of the anchorage length resistance models proposed in the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 and <em>fib</em> Model Code 2020. First, the two resistance models and their safety format are presented and discussed. Then, the probability distribution of the model uncertainty is estimated comparing the model predictions with a large set of flexural tests collected from the scientific literature. According to the results, the prestress release method and the strand surface conditions are the two variables affecting most the model uncertainty. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that anchorage lengths predicted with <em>fib</em> Model Code 2020 exceed the expected target level of reliability and they could be reduced, particularly for gradual prestress release. Conversely, anchorage lengths calculated according to the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 in case of sudden prestress release need to be increased to guarantee the expected level of reliability. For the same code, no significant changes are necessary in case of gradual prestress release.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102631"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic calibration of design resistance models for the anchorage length of prestressing strands considering model uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Belluco,&nbsp;Flora Faleschini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the reliability and the model uncertainty of the anchorage length resistance models proposed in the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 and <em>fib</em> Model Code 2020. First, the two resistance models and their safety format are presented and discussed. Then, the probability distribution of the model uncertainty is estimated comparing the model predictions with a large set of flexural tests collected from the scientific literature. According to the results, the prestress release method and the strand surface conditions are the two variables affecting most the model uncertainty. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that anchorage lengths predicted with <em>fib</em> Model Code 2020 exceed the expected target level of reliability and they could be reduced, particularly for gradual prestress release. Conversely, anchorage lengths calculated according to the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 in case of sudden prestress release need to be increased to guarantee the expected level of reliability. For the same code, no significant changes are necessary in case of gradual prestress release.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Safety\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473025000591\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473025000591","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了第二代欧洲规范2和fib模型规范2020中提出的锚固长度阻力模型的可靠性和模型不确定性。首先,提出并讨论了两种阻力模型及其安全格式。然后,将模型预测与从科学文献中收集的大量弯曲试验进行比较,估计模型不确定性的概率分布。结果表明,预应力释放方法和钢绞线表面条件是影响模型不确定性最大的两个变量。此外,还证明了fib模型规范2020预测的锚固长度超过了预期的目标可靠性水平,并且可以减小锚固长度,特别是在逐渐释放预应力的情况下。相反,根据第二代欧洲规范2计算的预应力突然释放情况下的锚固长度需要增加,以保证预期的可靠度水平。对于相同的规范,如果预应力逐渐释放,则不需要进行重大更改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic calibration of design resistance models for the anchorage length of prestressing strands considering model uncertainty
This study investigates the reliability and the model uncertainty of the anchorage length resistance models proposed in the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 and fib Model Code 2020. First, the two resistance models and their safety format are presented and discussed. Then, the probability distribution of the model uncertainty is estimated comparing the model predictions with a large set of flexural tests collected from the scientific literature. According to the results, the prestress release method and the strand surface conditions are the two variables affecting most the model uncertainty. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that anchorage lengths predicted with fib Model Code 2020 exceed the expected target level of reliability and they could be reduced, particularly for gradual prestress release. Conversely, anchorage lengths calculated according to the 2nd generation Eurocode 2 in case of sudden prestress release need to be increased to guarantee the expected level of reliability. For the same code, no significant changes are necessary in case of gradual prestress release.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信