十字路口的中层管理者:在新生生态系统中追求激进创新,驾驭合法性的紧张关系

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
S. James Ellis , Saeed Khanagha , Rick Aalbers , Philipp Tuertscher
{"title":"十字路口的中层管理者:在新生生态系统中追求激进创新,驾驭合法性的紧张关系","authors":"S. James Ellis ,&nbsp;Saeed Khanagha ,&nbsp;Rick Aalbers ,&nbsp;Philipp Tuertscher","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To pursue radical innovation in emergent digital ecosystems, middle managers need to balance the often conflicting expectations and interests of internal and external stakeholders. Our longitudinal field study of Atos, a leading IT company, follows a team of middle managers aiming to collaborate with novel financial technology firms—so-called fintechs—to catalyze radical innovation. We explore how they navigated contradictory legitimacy issues arising from stakeholders both internal and external to the firm. In doing so, we outline how they adopted and adjusted a changing mix of legitimacy-seeking behavior over time to generate and sustain an array of radical innovations. Our findings show how legitimacy issues continuously evolve as middle managers embed their innovation efforts, driven by shifting stakeholder expectations, leading them to adjust their legitimacy-seeking approach. We contribute to the literature on collaborative innovation ecosystem strategies, emphasizing the central role of middle managers in connecting the internal organizational stakeholders to external ecosystem actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 8","pages":"Article 105287"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle managers at the crossroads: Navigating legitimacy tensions in pursuit of radical innovation in nascent ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"S. James Ellis ,&nbsp;Saeed Khanagha ,&nbsp;Rick Aalbers ,&nbsp;Philipp Tuertscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To pursue radical innovation in emergent digital ecosystems, middle managers need to balance the often conflicting expectations and interests of internal and external stakeholders. Our longitudinal field study of Atos, a leading IT company, follows a team of middle managers aiming to collaborate with novel financial technology firms—so-called fintechs—to catalyze radical innovation. We explore how they navigated contradictory legitimacy issues arising from stakeholders both internal and external to the firm. In doing so, we outline how they adopted and adjusted a changing mix of legitimacy-seeking behavior over time to generate and sustain an array of radical innovations. Our findings show how legitimacy issues continuously evolve as middle managers embed their innovation efforts, driven by shifting stakeholder expectations, leading them to adjust their legitimacy-seeking approach. We contribute to the literature on collaborative innovation ecosystem strategies, emphasizing the central role of middle managers in connecting the internal organizational stakeholders to external ecosystem actors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 105287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001167\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在新兴的数字生态系统中追求激进的创新,中层管理者需要平衡内部和外部利益相关者经常相互冲突的期望和利益。我们对领先的IT公司Atos进行了纵向实地研究,跟踪了一组中层管理人员,他们的目标是与新型金融科技公司(所谓的金融科技公司)合作,以促进激进的创新。我们将探讨他们如何处理由公司内部和外部利益相关者引起的矛盾合法性问题。在此过程中,我们概述了他们如何随着时间的推移采用和调整不断变化的合法性寻求行为组合,以产生和维持一系列激进的创新。我们的研究结果表明,在利益相关者期望不断变化的推动下,随着中层管理者将创新工作嵌入其中,合法性问题如何不断演变,从而导致他们调整寻求合法性的方法。我们对协作创新生态系统战略的文献进行了贡献,强调中层管理人员在连接组织内部利益相关者与外部生态系统参与者方面的核心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Middle managers at the crossroads: Navigating legitimacy tensions in pursuit of radical innovation in nascent ecosystems
To pursue radical innovation in emergent digital ecosystems, middle managers need to balance the often conflicting expectations and interests of internal and external stakeholders. Our longitudinal field study of Atos, a leading IT company, follows a team of middle managers aiming to collaborate with novel financial technology firms—so-called fintechs—to catalyze radical innovation. We explore how they navigated contradictory legitimacy issues arising from stakeholders both internal and external to the firm. In doing so, we outline how they adopted and adjusted a changing mix of legitimacy-seeking behavior over time to generate and sustain an array of radical innovations. Our findings show how legitimacy issues continuously evolve as middle managers embed their innovation efforts, driven by shifting stakeholder expectations, leading them to adjust their legitimacy-seeking approach. We contribute to the literature on collaborative innovation ecosystem strategies, emphasizing the central role of middle managers in connecting the internal organizational stakeholders to external ecosystem actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信