{"title":"为什么人们会迁移:基于区域的悉尼城市内部迁移及其与建筑环境因素的关系探索","authors":"Yunzheng Zhang , Fubin Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intra-urban migration is closely linked to urban socio-spatial transformation, with built environments acting as potential “push” and “pull” factors. However, the role of built environments in driving aggregate-level intra-urban migration in Sydney, which is crucial for assessing urban planning effectiveness, remains insufficiently understood. This study examines Sydney's intra-urban migration patterns from 2006 to 2021 and applies the gravity model and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model to identify built-environment-related push and pull factors while accounting for spatial variance. The findings reveal that: (1) Intra-urban migration intensified in Sydney, particularly in the west. (2) Sufficient housing, more detached dwellings, and less non-private housing in the destination incentivized population inflows, while these same attributes at the origin discouraged outflows. Spatial variations in migration drivers were observed: detached housing discouraged short-distance inflows but promoted long-distance inflows. West-to-east movers tended to relocate to areas with fewer detached homes but more owner-occupied housing, while westward movers displayed an opposite trend. The relationship between schools and relocation also exhibited east-west spatial variance, potentially linked to the lower quality of education in the west. The study suggests that the city government consider a differentiated spatial housing market to meet different needs and enhance efforts to improve the quality of urban infrastructure in the west to address spatial inequality. These findings contribute to a better understanding of built environment factors within the push-pull framework of intra-urban migration concerning spatial heterogeneity, providing valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure planning and population (re)distribution in rapidly transforming metropolitan areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106176"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do people move: An area-based exploration of intra-urban migration in Sydney and its relationship with built environment factors\",\"authors\":\"Yunzheng Zhang , Fubin Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intra-urban migration is closely linked to urban socio-spatial transformation, with built environments acting as potential “push” and “pull” factors. However, the role of built environments in driving aggregate-level intra-urban migration in Sydney, which is crucial for assessing urban planning effectiveness, remains insufficiently understood. This study examines Sydney's intra-urban migration patterns from 2006 to 2021 and applies the gravity model and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model to identify built-environment-related push and pull factors while accounting for spatial variance. The findings reveal that: (1) Intra-urban migration intensified in Sydney, particularly in the west. (2) Sufficient housing, more detached dwellings, and less non-private housing in the destination incentivized population inflows, while these same attributes at the origin discouraged outflows. Spatial variations in migration drivers were observed: detached housing discouraged short-distance inflows but promoted long-distance inflows. West-to-east movers tended to relocate to areas with fewer detached homes but more owner-occupied housing, while westward movers displayed an opposite trend. The relationship between schools and relocation also exhibited east-west spatial variance, potentially linked to the lower quality of education in the west. The study suggests that the city government consider a differentiated spatial housing market to meet different needs and enhance efforts to improve the quality of urban infrastructure in the west to address spatial inequality. These findings contribute to a better understanding of built environment factors within the push-pull framework of intra-urban migration concerning spatial heterogeneity, providing valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure planning and population (re)distribution in rapidly transforming metropolitan areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125004779\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125004779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why do people move: An area-based exploration of intra-urban migration in Sydney and its relationship with built environment factors
Intra-urban migration is closely linked to urban socio-spatial transformation, with built environments acting as potential “push” and “pull” factors. However, the role of built environments in driving aggregate-level intra-urban migration in Sydney, which is crucial for assessing urban planning effectiveness, remains insufficiently understood. This study examines Sydney's intra-urban migration patterns from 2006 to 2021 and applies the gravity model and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model to identify built-environment-related push and pull factors while accounting for spatial variance. The findings reveal that: (1) Intra-urban migration intensified in Sydney, particularly in the west. (2) Sufficient housing, more detached dwellings, and less non-private housing in the destination incentivized population inflows, while these same attributes at the origin discouraged outflows. Spatial variations in migration drivers were observed: detached housing discouraged short-distance inflows but promoted long-distance inflows. West-to-east movers tended to relocate to areas with fewer detached homes but more owner-occupied housing, while westward movers displayed an opposite trend. The relationship between schools and relocation also exhibited east-west spatial variance, potentially linked to the lower quality of education in the west. The study suggests that the city government consider a differentiated spatial housing market to meet different needs and enhance efforts to improve the quality of urban infrastructure in the west to address spatial inequality. These findings contribute to a better understanding of built environment factors within the push-pull framework of intra-urban migration concerning spatial heterogeneity, providing valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure planning and population (re)distribution in rapidly transforming metropolitan areas.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.