Lurong Jia , Tong Wang , Kai Dong , Quanlin Chen , Chao Wang , Wenjuan Zhou , Zhonghao Liu
{"title":"Bio-Oss®和THE Graft®对牙槽嵴保存的显微ct和组织学评价:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Lurong Jia , Tong Wang , Kai Dong , Quanlin Chen , Chao Wang , Wenjuan Zhou , Zhonghao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.medntd.2025.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare volumetric changes and histological characteristics of new bone in extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®. Furthermore, it sought to further assess the quality and quantity of bone regeneration at 3- and 6-month intervals. Thirty-two patients requiring single-tooth extraction (excluding third molars) and ridge preservation in preparation for subsequent implant placement were randomized to receive either graft material (Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®) covered by a collagen membrane. At 3 months, BV/TV was higher in the DBBM groups than in the DPBM groups, while mineralized bone proportions were similar between groups. By 6 months, BV/TV remained significantly higher in DPBM groups than in the DBBM groups, and a higher proportion of mineralized bone was observed in the DPBM groups. Both groups showed increasing BV/TV and mineralized bone over time. In conclusion, both Bio-Oss® and THE Graft® effectively promoted socket bone regeneration, with healing time influencing bone formation. Long-term results suggest THE Graft® may enhance mineralized bone percentage more than Bio-Oss®.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33783,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-CT and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss® and THE Graft®: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Lurong Jia , Tong Wang , Kai Dong , Quanlin Chen , Chao Wang , Wenjuan Zhou , Zhonghao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medntd.2025.100377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare volumetric changes and histological characteristics of new bone in extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®. Furthermore, it sought to further assess the quality and quantity of bone regeneration at 3- and 6-month intervals. Thirty-two patients requiring single-tooth extraction (excluding third molars) and ridge preservation in preparation for subsequent implant placement were randomized to receive either graft material (Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®) covered by a collagen membrane. At 3 months, BV/TV was higher in the DBBM groups than in the DPBM groups, while mineralized bone proportions were similar between groups. By 6 months, BV/TV remained significantly higher in DPBM groups than in the DBBM groups, and a higher proportion of mineralized bone was observed in the DPBM groups. Both groups showed increasing BV/TV and mineralized bone over time. In conclusion, both Bio-Oss® and THE Graft® effectively promoted socket bone regeneration, with healing time influencing bone formation. Long-term results suggest THE Graft® may enhance mineralized bone percentage more than Bio-Oss®.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093525000281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093525000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micro-CT and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss® and THE Graft®: A randomized controlled trial
This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare volumetric changes and histological characteristics of new bone in extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®. Furthermore, it sought to further assess the quality and quantity of bone regeneration at 3- and 6-month intervals. Thirty-two patients requiring single-tooth extraction (excluding third molars) and ridge preservation in preparation for subsequent implant placement were randomized to receive either graft material (Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®) covered by a collagen membrane. At 3 months, BV/TV was higher in the DBBM groups than in the DPBM groups, while mineralized bone proportions were similar between groups. By 6 months, BV/TV remained significantly higher in DPBM groups than in the DBBM groups, and a higher proportion of mineralized bone was observed in the DPBM groups. Both groups showed increasing BV/TV and mineralized bone over time. In conclusion, both Bio-Oss® and THE Graft® effectively promoted socket bone regeneration, with healing time influencing bone formation. Long-term results suggest THE Graft® may enhance mineralized bone percentage more than Bio-Oss®.