很明显,轻型直升机飞越时的烦恼不同

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Matthew A. Boucher , Andrew W. Christian , Siddhartha Krishnamurthy , Stephen A. Rizzi
{"title":"很明显,轻型直升机飞越时的烦恼不同","authors":"Matthew A. Boucher ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Christian ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Krishnamurthy ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Rizzi","doi":"10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Noise certification standards for helicopters only include a small number of simple maneuvers. However, normal helicopter operations include a large variety of maneuvers, which may lead to a large variety of noise levels and a large variety of annoyance responses. As a result, a helicopter that is type certified may still produce noise levels that are perceived as annoying during normal operations. Specifically, noise certification metrics are not intended to track subtle yet important differences in annoyance perception, especially for the variety of sounds associated with different helicopter maneuvers. A psychoacoustic test is carried out to measure the variation in annoyance to helicopter maneuvers of equal A-weighted Sound Exposure Level (SEL). Results show that helicopter noises of equal SEL are not equal in terms of annoyance. A subset of helicopter noise stimuli are presented at higher or lower SEL, allowing changes in annoyance to be associated with changes in SEL and other metrics. Results show high correlation between annoyance and conventional, time-integrated noise certification metrics like SEL and Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNL) but also between annoyance and newer loudness-based metrics. Just-noticeable-differences in these metrics are calculated and show how much a metric must change to result in 75% agreement in the annoyance difference. Annoyance to helicopter maneuvers is highly variable, but the limits of this variation are discussed and quantified in relation to just-noticeable-differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Acoustics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 110900"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just-noticeable-differences for annoyance to lightweight helicopter flyovers\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A. Boucher ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Christian ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Krishnamurthy ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Rizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Noise certification standards for helicopters only include a small number of simple maneuvers. However, normal helicopter operations include a large variety of maneuvers, which may lead to a large variety of noise levels and a large variety of annoyance responses. As a result, a helicopter that is type certified may still produce noise levels that are perceived as annoying during normal operations. Specifically, noise certification metrics are not intended to track subtle yet important differences in annoyance perception, especially for the variety of sounds associated with different helicopter maneuvers. A psychoacoustic test is carried out to measure the variation in annoyance to helicopter maneuvers of equal A-weighted Sound Exposure Level (SEL). Results show that helicopter noises of equal SEL are not equal in terms of annoyance. A subset of helicopter noise stimuli are presented at higher or lower SEL, allowing changes in annoyance to be associated with changes in SEL and other metrics. Results show high correlation between annoyance and conventional, time-integrated noise certification metrics like SEL and Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNL) but also between annoyance and newer loudness-based metrics. Just-noticeable-differences in these metrics are calculated and show how much a metric must change to result in 75% agreement in the annoyance difference. Annoyance to helicopter maneuvers is highly variable, but the limits of this variation are discussed and quantified in relation to just-noticeable-differences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X2500372X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X2500372X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直升机的噪音认证标准只包括少量简单的机动动作。然而,正常的直升机操作包括各种各样的机动,这可能导致各种各样的噪音水平和各种各样的烦恼反应。因此,一架型号认证的直升机可能仍然会产生噪音水平,在正常操作期间被认为是烦人的。具体来说,噪音认证指标并不是为了跟踪烦恼感知的细微但重要的差异,特别是与不同直升机机动相关的各种声音。采用心理声学实验测量等A加权声暴露水平(SEL)对直升机机动的干扰变化。结果表明,相同SEL的直升机噪声在恼人程度上是不相等的。直升机噪声刺激的一个子集以更高或更低的SEL呈现,允许烦恼的变化与SEL和其他指标的变化相关联。结果表明,烦恼与传统的、时间集成的噪音认证指标(如SEL和有效感知噪音水平(EPNL))之间存在高度相关性,而且烦恼与新的基于噪音的指标之间也存在高度相关性。计算这些指标的差异,并显示指标必须改变多少才能使75%的烦恼差异一致。对直升机机动的烦恼是高度可变的,但这种变化的限制是讨论和量化的关系到刚刚注意到的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Just-noticeable-differences for annoyance to lightweight helicopter flyovers

Just-noticeable-differences for annoyance to lightweight helicopter flyovers
Noise certification standards for helicopters only include a small number of simple maneuvers. However, normal helicopter operations include a large variety of maneuvers, which may lead to a large variety of noise levels and a large variety of annoyance responses. As a result, a helicopter that is type certified may still produce noise levels that are perceived as annoying during normal operations. Specifically, noise certification metrics are not intended to track subtle yet important differences in annoyance perception, especially for the variety of sounds associated with different helicopter maneuvers. A psychoacoustic test is carried out to measure the variation in annoyance to helicopter maneuvers of equal A-weighted Sound Exposure Level (SEL). Results show that helicopter noises of equal SEL are not equal in terms of annoyance. A subset of helicopter noise stimuli are presented at higher or lower SEL, allowing changes in annoyance to be associated with changes in SEL and other metrics. Results show high correlation between annoyance and conventional, time-integrated noise certification metrics like SEL and Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNL) but also between annoyance and newer loudness-based metrics. Just-noticeable-differences in these metrics are calculated and show how much a metric must change to result in 75% agreement in the annoyance difference. Annoyance to helicopter maneuvers is highly variable, but the limits of this variation are discussed and quantified in relation to just-noticeable-differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Acoustics
Applied Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
618
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1968, Applied Acoustics has been publishing high quality research papers providing state-of-the-art coverage of research findings for engineers and scientists involved in applications of acoustics in the widest sense. Applied Acoustics looks not only at recent developments in the understanding of acoustics but also at ways of exploiting that understanding. The Journal aims to encourage the exchange of practical experience through publication and in so doing creates a fund of technological information that can be used for solving related problems. The presentation of information in graphical or tabular form is especially encouraged. If a report of a mathematical development is a necessary part of a paper it is important to ensure that it is there only as an integral part of a practical solution to a problem and is supported by data. Applied Acoustics encourages the exchange of practical experience in the following ways: • Complete Papers • Short Technical Notes • Review Articles; and thereby provides a wealth of technological information that can be used to solve related problems. Manuscripts that address all fields of applications of acoustics ranging from medicine and NDT to the environment and buildings are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信