Baoxing Wei , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Jiawei Chen , Yu Lin , Yi Ding
{"title":"机器学习驱动的内置竹芯或木芯钢管混凝土柱轴向承载力预测","authors":"Baoxing Wei , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Jiawei Chen , Yu Lin , Yi Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies on concrete-filled steel tube columns with built-in bamboo or timber cores (CFST-BTC) not only optimize the mechanical properties of conventional concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns but also reduce concrete usage and carbon emissions, enhancing structural sustainability. This study establishes a CFST-BTC database of 271 specimens under axial compression and evaluates various machine learning (ML) models for predicting their ultimate bearing capacity (<em>N</em><sub><em>cu</em></sub>). Six mainstream ML algorithms such as ANN, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting Regressor, CatBoost, XGBoost and AdaBoost were assessed for training and predicting <em>N</em><sub><em>cu</em></sub> of CFST-BTC. Gradient Boosting Regressor and ANN effectively predicted the experimental results, achieving R² values of 0.9988/0.9985 for the training set and 0.9964/0.9959 for the test set, significantly outperforming traditional analytical models. Based on SHAP analysis, key parameters were identified, nonlinear relationships were revealed, and the user-friendly analytical equation was formulated based on ANN. The proposed equation demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving an R² value of 0.9609 and an RMSE of 156.35. Although these results are slightly inferior to those of the six ML surrogate models, they surpass the explicit equation constructed using multiplication (R² = 0.9297) and other traditional analytical models. The user-friendly equation suggests that the optimal substitution ratio (<em>w</em>) of bamboo or timber core replacing the core concrete in CFST-BTC is 36.5 %, providing guidance for the practical application of CFST-BTC columns in engineering. Meanwhile, the suggested explicit equation effectively satisfies the boundary conditions at <em>w</em> = 0 and <em>w</em> = 1, ensuring reliable predictions for ultimate bearing capacity of both CFST columns and bamboo or timber-filled steel tube (BTFST) columns without computational inconsistencies at the boundary conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 120817"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-driven prediction of axial capacity of concrete-filled steel tubes columns with built-in bamboo or timber cores\",\"authors\":\"Baoxing Wei , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Jiawei Chen , Yu Lin , Yi Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Studies on concrete-filled steel tube columns with built-in bamboo or timber cores (CFST-BTC) not only optimize the mechanical properties of conventional concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns but also reduce concrete usage and carbon emissions, enhancing structural sustainability. This study establishes a CFST-BTC database of 271 specimens under axial compression and evaluates various machine learning (ML) models for predicting their ultimate bearing capacity (<em>N</em><sub><em>cu</em></sub>). Six mainstream ML algorithms such as ANN, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting Regressor, CatBoost, XGBoost and AdaBoost were assessed for training and predicting <em>N</em><sub><em>cu</em></sub> of CFST-BTC. Gradient Boosting Regressor and ANN effectively predicted the experimental results, achieving R² values of 0.9988/0.9985 for the training set and 0.9964/0.9959 for the test set, significantly outperforming traditional analytical models. Based on SHAP analysis, key parameters were identified, nonlinear relationships were revealed, and the user-friendly analytical equation was formulated based on ANN. The proposed equation demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving an R² value of 0.9609 and an RMSE of 156.35. Although these results are slightly inferior to those of the six ML surrogate models, they surpass the explicit equation constructed using multiplication (R² = 0.9297) and other traditional analytical models. The user-friendly equation suggests that the optimal substitution ratio (<em>w</em>) of bamboo or timber core replacing the core concrete in CFST-BTC is 36.5 %, providing guidance for the practical application of CFST-BTC columns in engineering. Meanwhile, the suggested explicit equation effectively satisfies the boundary conditions at <em>w</em> = 0 and <em>w</em> = 1, ensuring reliable predictions for ultimate bearing capacity of both CFST columns and bamboo or timber-filled steel tube (BTFST) columns without computational inconsistencies at the boundary conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"341 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625012088\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625012088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning-driven prediction of axial capacity of concrete-filled steel tubes columns with built-in bamboo or timber cores
Studies on concrete-filled steel tube columns with built-in bamboo or timber cores (CFST-BTC) not only optimize the mechanical properties of conventional concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns but also reduce concrete usage and carbon emissions, enhancing structural sustainability. This study establishes a CFST-BTC database of 271 specimens under axial compression and evaluates various machine learning (ML) models for predicting their ultimate bearing capacity (Ncu). Six mainstream ML algorithms such as ANN, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting Regressor, CatBoost, XGBoost and AdaBoost were assessed for training and predicting Ncu of CFST-BTC. Gradient Boosting Regressor and ANN effectively predicted the experimental results, achieving R² values of 0.9988/0.9985 for the training set and 0.9964/0.9959 for the test set, significantly outperforming traditional analytical models. Based on SHAP analysis, key parameters were identified, nonlinear relationships were revealed, and the user-friendly analytical equation was formulated based on ANN. The proposed equation demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving an R² value of 0.9609 and an RMSE of 156.35. Although these results are slightly inferior to those of the six ML surrogate models, they surpass the explicit equation constructed using multiplication (R² = 0.9297) and other traditional analytical models. The user-friendly equation suggests that the optimal substitution ratio (w) of bamboo or timber core replacing the core concrete in CFST-BTC is 36.5 %, providing guidance for the practical application of CFST-BTC columns in engineering. Meanwhile, the suggested explicit equation effectively satisfies the boundary conditions at w = 0 and w = 1, ensuring reliable predictions for ultimate bearing capacity of both CFST columns and bamboo or timber-filled steel tube (BTFST) columns without computational inconsistencies at the boundary conditions.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.