探讨抑郁症父母及其子女的心理健康研究重点。

IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY
Victoria Powell,Emma Meilak,Chloe Booth,Lucy Owen,Lucy Brookes-Howell,Anita Thapar,Frances Rice
{"title":"探讨抑郁症父母及其子女的心理健康研究重点。","authors":"Victoria Powell,Emma Meilak,Chloe Booth,Lucy Owen,Lucy Brookes-Howell,Anita Thapar,Frances Rice","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWhile patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is growing, PPI in the setting of research priorities at an early stage of the research process has been limited to date. Where research priorities have been assessed, this has been done by working with members of the general public. Research priorities are likely to vary between different groups, and families affected by depression have been recognised as an important group for research.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nWe aimed to explore the mental health research priorities of parents with a history of depression and their children.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData came from the Early Prediction of Adolescent Depression (EPAD) study-a UK longitudinal cohort study of parents with a history of depression and their children. During interviews, parents (n=161) and their young adult children (n=131) were asked open-ended questions about their research priorities. Responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nParents and their young adult children highlighted the following research priority categories: treatment and intervention, including prevention and early intervention, public understanding of mental health, environmental or social factors that might contribute to poor mental health, the role of genetics in intergenerational transmission, and a developmental and intergenerational approach to research.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWhile prior research has identified the importance of intervention and social factors, our study also identified public understanding of mental health and aetiological research, particularly on the contribution of genetics relative to environmental factors, as priorities for parents with depression and their children.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\r\nFindings highlight the value of involving diverse groups in priority-setting exercises, including groups that are recognised as important for research, to allow their views to be incorporated into agenda-setting initiatives, including for research funding.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the mental health research priorities of parents with depression and their children.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Powell,Emma Meilak,Chloe Booth,Lucy Owen,Lucy Brookes-Howell,Anita Thapar,Frances Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nWhile patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is growing, PPI in the setting of research priorities at an early stage of the research process has been limited to date. Where research priorities have been assessed, this has been done by working with members of the general public. Research priorities are likely to vary between different groups, and families affected by depression have been recognised as an important group for research.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nWe aimed to explore the mental health research priorities of parents with a history of depression and their children.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nData came from the Early Prediction of Adolescent Depression (EPAD) study-a UK longitudinal cohort study of parents with a history of depression and their children. During interviews, parents (n=161) and their young adult children (n=131) were asked open-ended questions about their research priorities. Responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nParents and their young adult children highlighted the following research priority categories: treatment and intervention, including prevention and early intervention, public understanding of mental health, environmental or social factors that might contribute to poor mental health, the role of genetics in intergenerational transmission, and a developmental and intergenerational approach to research.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWhile prior research has identified the importance of intervention and social factors, our study also identified public understanding of mental health and aetiological research, particularly on the contribution of genetics relative to environmental factors, as priorities for parents with depression and their children.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\\r\\nFindings highlight the value of involving diverse groups in priority-setting exercises, including groups that are recognised as important for research, to allow their views to be incorporated into agenda-setting initiatives, including for research funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然患者和公众参与(PPI)在研究中越来越多,但迄今为止,在研究过程的早期阶段设定研究优先级的PPI受到限制。在评估研究重点时,这是通过与公众合作来完成的。研究的重点可能在不同的群体之间有所不同,受抑郁症影响的家庭被认为是一个重要的研究群体。目的探讨有抑郁史的父母及其子女的心理健康研究重点。方法数据来自青少年抑郁早期预测(EPAD)研究,这是一项针对有抑郁史的父母及其子女的英国纵向队列研究。在访谈中,父母(n=161)和他们年轻的成年子女(n=131)被问及关于他们的研究重点的开放式问题。采用定性内容分析对反应进行分析。研究发现:父母及其年幼的成年子女强调了以下研究重点类别:治疗和干预,包括预防和早期干预,公众对心理健康的理解,可能导致心理健康状况不佳的环境或社会因素,遗传在代际传播中的作用,以及发展和代际研究方法。虽然先前的研究已经确定了干预和社会因素的重要性,但我们的研究也确定了公众对心理健康和病因学研究的理解,特别是遗传因素对环境因素的影响,是抑郁症父母及其子女的优先考虑因素。研究结果强调了让不同群体参与制定优先事项的价值,包括那些被认为对研究很重要的群体,以便将他们的观点纳入议程制定倡议,包括研究资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the mental health research priorities of parents with depression and their children.
BACKGROUND While patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is growing, PPI in the setting of research priorities at an early stage of the research process has been limited to date. Where research priorities have been assessed, this has been done by working with members of the general public. Research priorities are likely to vary between different groups, and families affected by depression have been recognised as an important group for research. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore the mental health research priorities of parents with a history of depression and their children. METHODS Data came from the Early Prediction of Adolescent Depression (EPAD) study-a UK longitudinal cohort study of parents with a history of depression and their children. During interviews, parents (n=161) and their young adult children (n=131) were asked open-ended questions about their research priorities. Responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS Parents and their young adult children highlighted the following research priority categories: treatment and intervention, including prevention and early intervention, public understanding of mental health, environmental or social factors that might contribute to poor mental health, the role of genetics in intergenerational transmission, and a developmental and intergenerational approach to research. CONCLUSIONS While prior research has identified the importance of intervention and social factors, our study also identified public understanding of mental health and aetiological research, particularly on the contribution of genetics relative to environmental factors, as priorities for parents with depression and their children. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Findings highlight the value of involving diverse groups in priority-setting exercises, including groups that are recognised as important for research, to allow their views to be incorporated into agenda-setting initiatives, including for research funding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信