肠道微生物群与肺栓塞的因果关系:孟德尔随机化分析。

Polish journal of microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.33073/pjm-2025-013
Lilan Cen, Ling Qin, Wanling Chen, Lihua Wei, Caixia Tang, Xiang Teng, Zhe Tian
{"title":"肠道微生物群与肺栓塞的因果关系:孟德尔随机化分析。","authors":"Lilan Cen, Ling Qin, Wanling Chen, Lihua Wei, Caixia Tang, Xiang Teng, Zhe Tian","doi":"10.33073/pjm-2025-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated a connection between an unbalanced gut microbiome (GM) and lung diseases, suggesting that gut bacteria may affect lung health through the \"gut-lung\" axis. However, the direct connection between GM and pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear. Mendelian randomization studies were used to investigate GM's genetic relationship with PE. A total of 18,340 independent genewide association studies (GWAS) yielded single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to the GM, which were then used as instrumental variables in a multiple regression analysis (MR) to examine the effect of GM on the risk of PE within the IEU Open GWAS project, which included 2,118 PE cases and 359,076 controls. The principal analytical methodology utilized in this research was inverse variance weighting (IVW), complemented by assessments for pleiotropy and heterogeneity to confirm the results' resilience. The findings of this study are predominantly derived from the IVW method, providing evidence for causal associations between four distinct genera of GM and the risk of PE. Specifically, our analysis suggests that <i>Slackia</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.031), <i>Oscillospira</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.038), <i>Bacteroides</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.032), and <i>Clostridium sensu stricto 1</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.049) may be linked to a decreased likelihood of developing PE. Importantly, our analysis yielded no evidence of heterogeneity or pleiotropy. In this MR study, we have established through genetic analysis that specific GM are significantly involved in the development of PE, underscoring the connection between the gut-lung axis and suggesting avenues for future research into the impact of GM on PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94173,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of microbiology","volume":"74 2","pages":"153-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Pulmonary Embolism: An Analysis Using Mendelian Randomization.\",\"authors\":\"Lilan Cen, Ling Qin, Wanling Chen, Lihua Wei, Caixia Tang, Xiang Teng, Zhe Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.33073/pjm-2025-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated a connection between an unbalanced gut microbiome (GM) and lung diseases, suggesting that gut bacteria may affect lung health through the \\\"gut-lung\\\" axis. However, the direct connection between GM and pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear. Mendelian randomization studies were used to investigate GM's genetic relationship with PE. A total of 18,340 independent genewide association studies (GWAS) yielded single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to the GM, which were then used as instrumental variables in a multiple regression analysis (MR) to examine the effect of GM on the risk of PE within the IEU Open GWAS project, which included 2,118 PE cases and 359,076 controls. The principal analytical methodology utilized in this research was inverse variance weighting (IVW), complemented by assessments for pleiotropy and heterogeneity to confirm the results' resilience. The findings of this study are predominantly derived from the IVW method, providing evidence for causal associations between four distinct genera of GM and the risk of PE. Specifically, our analysis suggests that <i>Slackia</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.031), <i>Oscillospira</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.038), <i>Bacteroides</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.032), and <i>Clostridium sensu stricto 1</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.049) may be linked to a decreased likelihood of developing PE. Importantly, our analysis yielded no evidence of heterogeneity or pleiotropy. In this MR study, we have established through genetic analysis that specific GM are significantly involved in the development of PE, underscoring the connection between the gut-lung axis and suggesting avenues for future research into the impact of GM on PE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish journal of microbiology\",\"volume\":\"74 2\",\"pages\":\"153-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182918/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish journal of microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2025-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2025-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究已经证明了不平衡的肠道微生物组(GM)与肺部疾病之间的联系,这表明肠道细菌可能通过“肠-肺”轴影响肺部健康。然而,GM与肺栓塞(PE)之间的直接联系尚不清楚。采用孟德尔随机化方法研究转基因与PE的遗传关系。共有18,340项独立的全基因关联研究(GWAS)得出了与转基因相关的单核苷酸多态性(snp),然后将其用作多元回归分析(MR)中的工具变量,以检查转基因对PE风险的影响,该项目包括2,118例PE病例和359,076例对照。本研究使用的主要分析方法是逆方差加权(IVW),辅以多效性和异质性评估,以确认结果的弹性。本研究的结果主要来自IVW方法,为四种不同类型的GM与PE风险之间的因果关系提供了证据。具体来说,我们的分析表明,Slackia (p = 0.031)、Oscillospira (p = 0.038)、Bacteroides (p = 0.032)和Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (p = 0.049)可能与PE发生可能性降低有关。重要的是,我们的分析没有发现异质性或多效性的证据。在这项MR研究中,我们通过遗传分析确定了特定的转基因在PE的发展中具有重要作用,强调了肠-肺轴之间的联系,并为未来研究转基因对PE的影响提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Pulmonary Embolism: An Analysis Using Mendelian Randomization.

Previous research has demonstrated a connection between an unbalanced gut microbiome (GM) and lung diseases, suggesting that gut bacteria may affect lung health through the "gut-lung" axis. However, the direct connection between GM and pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear. Mendelian randomization studies were used to investigate GM's genetic relationship with PE. A total of 18,340 independent genewide association studies (GWAS) yielded single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to the GM, which were then used as instrumental variables in a multiple regression analysis (MR) to examine the effect of GM on the risk of PE within the IEU Open GWAS project, which included 2,118 PE cases and 359,076 controls. The principal analytical methodology utilized in this research was inverse variance weighting (IVW), complemented by assessments for pleiotropy and heterogeneity to confirm the results' resilience. The findings of this study are predominantly derived from the IVW method, providing evidence for causal associations between four distinct genera of GM and the risk of PE. Specifically, our analysis suggests that Slackia (p = 0.031), Oscillospira (p = 0.038), Bacteroides (p = 0.032), and Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (p = 0.049) may be linked to a decreased likelihood of developing PE. Importantly, our analysis yielded no evidence of heterogeneity or pleiotropy. In this MR study, we have established through genetic analysis that specific GM are significantly involved in the development of PE, underscoring the connection between the gut-lung axis and suggesting avenues for future research into the impact of GM on PE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信