绿茶提取物凝胶局部给药治疗牙周炎的临床疗效评价。

Santhiya Rengaraj, Sri Sivashankari Thilagar, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Priyanka Pampani, Ebenezer Mani, Carlos M Ardila
{"title":"绿茶提取物凝胶局部给药治疗牙周炎的临床疗效评价。","authors":"Santhiya Rengaraj, Sri Sivashankari Thilagar, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Priyanka Pampani, Ebenezer Mani, Carlos M Ardila","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.105636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by periodontal pocket formation, clinical attachment loss, and destruction of alveolar bone. Its conventional treatment primarily involves mechanical debridement and plaque control, but localized antimicrobial therapy offers site-specific advantages. While antibiotics such as metronidazole and doxycycline are commonly used, green tea extract, which is rich in epigallocatechin gallate, has been proposed as a promising alternative for local drug delivery due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of green tea extract gel and ornidazole gel as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth with probing pocket depths (PPD) of 4-7 mm were selected. Participants' baseline oral hygiene index-simplified, plaque index, clinical attachment loss, and PPD were recorded. The participants were randomized into two groups: One received green tea extract gel after SRP, and the other received ornidazole gel. Subgingival drug delivery was performed, and participants refrained from brushing or interproximal cleaning for ten days. Their clinical parameters were re-evaluated after one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PPD decreased significantly from baseline to one month in both groups. However, the green tea extract gel group exhibited superior outcomes to the ornidazole gel group, with a mean difference in PPD of 0.28 ± 0.78 mm at one month (<i>P</i> < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As an adjunct to SRP, green tea extract gel showed greater efficacy in improving clinical periodontal parameters than ornidazole gel.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"105636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of green tea extract gel as local drug delivery for periodontitis.\",\"authors\":\"Santhiya Rengaraj, Sri Sivashankari Thilagar, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Priyanka Pampani, Ebenezer Mani, Carlos M Ardila\",\"doi\":\"10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.105636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by periodontal pocket formation, clinical attachment loss, and destruction of alveolar bone. Its conventional treatment primarily involves mechanical debridement and plaque control, but localized antimicrobial therapy offers site-specific advantages. While antibiotics such as metronidazole and doxycycline are commonly used, green tea extract, which is rich in epigallocatechin gallate, has been proposed as a promising alternative for local drug delivery due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of green tea extract gel and ornidazole gel as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth with probing pocket depths (PPD) of 4-7 mm were selected. Participants' baseline oral hygiene index-simplified, plaque index, clinical attachment loss, and PPD were recorded. The participants were randomized into two groups: One received green tea extract gel after SRP, and the other received ornidazole gel. Subgingival drug delivery was performed, and participants refrained from brushing or interproximal cleaning for ten days. Their clinical parameters were re-evaluated after one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PPD decreased significantly from baseline to one month in both groups. However, the green tea extract gel group exhibited superior outcomes to the ornidazole gel group, with a mean difference in PPD of 0.28 ± 0.78 mm at one month (<i>P</i> < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As an adjunct to SRP, green tea extract gel showed greater efficacy in improving clinical periodontal parameters than ornidazole gel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"105636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.105636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.105636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙周病是一种慢性炎症性疾病,以牙周袋形成、临床附着丧失和牙槽骨破坏为特征。其传统治疗主要包括机械清创和菌斑控制,但局部抗菌治疗具有部位特异性优势。虽然甲硝唑和强力霉素等抗生素通常被使用,但绿茶提取物富含表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯,由于其抗炎和抗菌特性,已被提议作为一种有希望的局部药物递送替代方案。目的:比较绿茶提取物凝胶与奥硝唑凝胶辅助刮治牙周炎的临床疗效。方法:选择牙槽探查深度(PPD)为4 ~ 7mm的牙。记录参与者的基线口腔卫生指数-简化,菌斑指数,临床附着丧失和PPD。参与者被随机分为两组:一组在SRP后服用绿茶提取物凝胶,另一组服用奥硝唑凝胶。进行龈下药物递送,参与者避免刷牙或近端间清洁10天。1个月后重新评估临床参数。结果:两组患者PPD均较基线水平显著下降。然而,绿茶提取物凝胶组表现出优于奥硝唑凝胶组的结果,一个月时PPD的平均差异为0.28±0.78 mm (P < 0.007)。结论:作为SRP的辅助用药,绿茶提取物凝胶改善临床牙周参数的效果优于奥硝唑凝胶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of green tea extract gel as local drug delivery for periodontitis.

Background: Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by periodontal pocket formation, clinical attachment loss, and destruction of alveolar bone. Its conventional treatment primarily involves mechanical debridement and plaque control, but localized antimicrobial therapy offers site-specific advantages. While antibiotics such as metronidazole and doxycycline are commonly used, green tea extract, which is rich in epigallocatechin gallate, has been proposed as a promising alternative for local drug delivery due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties.

Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of green tea extract gel and ornidazole gel as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with periodontitis.

Methods: Teeth with probing pocket depths (PPD) of 4-7 mm were selected. Participants' baseline oral hygiene index-simplified, plaque index, clinical attachment loss, and PPD were recorded. The participants were randomized into two groups: One received green tea extract gel after SRP, and the other received ornidazole gel. Subgingival drug delivery was performed, and participants refrained from brushing or interproximal cleaning for ten days. Their clinical parameters were re-evaluated after one month.

Results: The PPD decreased significantly from baseline to one month in both groups. However, the green tea extract gel group exhibited superior outcomes to the ornidazole gel group, with a mean difference in PPD of 0.28 ± 0.78 mm at one month (P < 0.007).

Conclusion: As an adjunct to SRP, green tea extract gel showed greater efficacy in improving clinical periodontal parameters than ornidazole gel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信