预防老年2型糖尿病和轻度认知障碍患者认知能力下降的多领域干预:J-MINT的二次分析:2型糖尿病的多领域干预

JAR life Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016
Taiki Sugimoto, Paul K Crane, Seo-Eun Choi, Kosuke Fujita, Jeanne Gallée, Yujiro Kuroda, Michael Lee, Nanae Matsumoto, Akinori Nakamura, Hisashi Noma, Takuya Omura, Ayaka Onoyama, Phoebe Scollard, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai
{"title":"预防老年2型糖尿病和轻度认知障碍患者认知能力下降的多领域干预:J-MINT的二次分析:2型糖尿病的多领域干预","authors":"Taiki Sugimoto, Paul K Crane, Seo-Eun Choi, Kosuke Fujita, Jeanne Gallée, Yujiro Kuroda, Michael Lee, Nanae Matsumoto, Akinori Nakamura, Hisashi Noma, Takuya Omura, Ayaka Onoyama, Phoebe Scollard, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai","doi":"10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify subgroups who may be more likely to respond well to a multidomain intervention among older adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the Japan Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia. A total 531 participants aged 65-85 years with mild cognitive impairment were randomized into intervention (vascular risk management, exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control (health-related information) groups. The outcome was the change in average Z scores of neuropsychological tests from baseline to 18 months. Interactions between intervention and age (65-74, 75-85 years), memory impairment (amnestic, nonamnestic), HbA1c levels (within, outside target range), or <i>APOE</i> genotype (0, ≥1 <i>APOE</i> ε4 alleles) among participants with diabetes were evaluated using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 76 participants with diabetes, a significant age × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.007) was found, which was driven by benefits in the younger age group (Z score difference: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) that were not observed in the older age group. Intervention benefits were also detected in those with HbA1c levels outside the target range (Z score difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56), with HbA1c levels × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.021). No significant interactions were detected between intervention and memory impairment or <i>APOE</i> genotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidomain interventions may benefit younger older adults or those with overly strict or lenient HbA1c control; however, these findings need confirmation in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":"14 ","pages":"100016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidomain interventions for preventing cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment: Secondary analysis of the J-MINT: Multidomain intervention in type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Taiki Sugimoto, Paul K Crane, Seo-Eun Choi, Kosuke Fujita, Jeanne Gallée, Yujiro Kuroda, Michael Lee, Nanae Matsumoto, Akinori Nakamura, Hisashi Noma, Takuya Omura, Ayaka Onoyama, Phoebe Scollard, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify subgroups who may be more likely to respond well to a multidomain intervention among older adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the Japan Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia. A total 531 participants aged 65-85 years with mild cognitive impairment were randomized into intervention (vascular risk management, exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control (health-related information) groups. The outcome was the change in average Z scores of neuropsychological tests from baseline to 18 months. Interactions between intervention and age (65-74, 75-85 years), memory impairment (amnestic, nonamnestic), HbA1c levels (within, outside target range), or <i>APOE</i> genotype (0, ≥1 <i>APOE</i> ε4 alleles) among participants with diabetes were evaluated using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 76 participants with diabetes, a significant age × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.007) was found, which was driven by benefits in the younger age group (Z score difference: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) that were not observed in the older age group. Intervention benefits were also detected in those with HbA1c levels outside the target range (Z score difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56), with HbA1c levels × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.021). No significant interactions were detected between intervention and memory impairment or <i>APOE</i> genotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidomain interventions may benefit younger older adults or those with overly strict or lenient HbA1c control; however, these findings need confirmation in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAR life\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"100016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAR life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定对老年2型糖尿病患者多领域干预反应良好的亚组。材料和方法:本研究是对日本预防痴呆多模式干预试验的二次分析。531名年龄在65-85岁的轻度认知障碍参与者被随机分为干预组(血管风险管理、运动、营养咨询和认知训练)和对照组(健康相关信息)。结果是神经心理测试的平均Z分数从基线到18个月的变化。使用重复测量的混合效应模型评估干预与糖尿病参与者的年龄(65-74岁、75-85岁)、记忆障碍(健忘症、非健忘症)、HbA1c水平(在目标范围内、目标范围外)或APOE基因型(0、≥1个APOE ε4等位基因)之间的相互作用。结果:在76名糖尿病患者中,发现了显著的年龄×干预相互作用(P = 0.007),这是由于年轻年龄组的益处(Z评分差:0.33,95% CI: 0.09至0.55),而在老年组中没有观察到。在HbA1c水平超出目标范围的患者中也发现了干预的益处(Z评分差:0.31,95% CI: 0.06至0.56),HbA1c水平与干预的相互作用(P = 0.021)。干预与记忆障碍或APOE基因型之间没有发现显著的相互作用。结论:多领域干预可能有利于年轻的老年人或对HbA1c控制过于严格或宽松的老年人;然而,这些发现需要在未来的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidomain interventions for preventing cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment: Secondary analysis of the J-MINT: Multidomain intervention in type 2 diabetes.

Aims: To identify subgroups who may be more likely to respond well to a multidomain intervention among older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the Japan Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia. A total 531 participants aged 65-85 years with mild cognitive impairment were randomized into intervention (vascular risk management, exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control (health-related information) groups. The outcome was the change in average Z scores of neuropsychological tests from baseline to 18 months. Interactions between intervention and age (65-74, 75-85 years), memory impairment (amnestic, nonamnestic), HbA1c levels (within, outside target range), or APOE genotype (0, ≥1 APOE ε4 alleles) among participants with diabetes were evaluated using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures.

Results: Among 76 participants with diabetes, a significant age × intervention interaction (P = 0.007) was found, which was driven by benefits in the younger age group (Z score difference: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) that were not observed in the older age group. Intervention benefits were also detected in those with HbA1c levels outside the target range (Z score difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56), with HbA1c levels × intervention interaction (P = 0.021). No significant interactions were detected between intervention and memory impairment or APOE genotype.

Conclusions: Multidomain interventions may benefit younger older adults or those with overly strict or lenient HbA1c control; however, these findings need confirmation in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信