mepolizumab治疗严重嗜酸性哮喘患者的临床缓解对生活质量的影响。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Yuto Hamada, Dennis Thomas, Vanessa M McDonald, Erin S Harvey, Michael Fricker, Andrew Gillman, Mark Hew, Vicky Kritikos, John W Upham, Peter G Gibson
{"title":"mepolizumab治疗严重嗜酸性哮喘患者的临床缓解对生活质量的影响。","authors":"Yuto Hamada, Dennis Thomas, Vanessa M McDonald, Erin S Harvey, Michael Fricker, Andrew Gillman, Mark Hew, Vicky Kritikos, John W Upham, Peter G Gibson","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics can induce clinical remission in severe asthma. However, the benefits of achieving remission from the patient's perspective remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between achieving clinical remission and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nested, matched case-control study, data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry (AMR) were used to compare the proportions of participants attaining Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]) scores of greater than or equal to 6, indicating minimal or no HRQoL impairment, between 42 participants who achieved clinical remission at 12 months and 64 propensity score-matched participants who did not. Assessed AQLQ(S) scores included overall and domain scores for symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Clinical remission was assessed at 12 months, defined as Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score less than 1.5, no exacerbations in the previous 12 months, and no oral corticosteroids use for asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater proportion of participants achieving clinical remission had AQLQ(S) scores of greater than or equal to 6 at 12 months compared with those who did not: overall scores (61.9% vs 26.6%, P = .001), symptom domain (59.5% vs 29.7%, P = .004), activity limitation domain (59.5% vs 28.1%, P = .003), emotional function domain (69.0% vs 31.2%, P < .001), and environmental stimuli domain (57.1% vs 34.4%, P = .035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving clinical remission at 12 months was associated with minimal or no impairment in HRQoL, although approximately 38% of participants in remission still experienced impaired HRQoL, highlighting residual unmet needs. Further research is needed to better understand the benefits of asthma remission from the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The AMR is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001497291). The AMR is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational registry for the postmarketing surveillance of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. The AMR is approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees in the study sites, and all participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of clinical remission on quality of life in severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab.\",\"authors\":\"Yuto Hamada, Dennis Thomas, Vanessa M McDonald, Erin S Harvey, Michael Fricker, Andrew Gillman, Mark Hew, Vicky Kritikos, John W Upham, Peter G Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics can induce clinical remission in severe asthma. However, the benefits of achieving remission from the patient's perspective remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between achieving clinical remission and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nested, matched case-control study, data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry (AMR) were used to compare the proportions of participants attaining Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]) scores of greater than or equal to 6, indicating minimal or no HRQoL impairment, between 42 participants who achieved clinical remission at 12 months and 64 propensity score-matched participants who did not. Assessed AQLQ(S) scores included overall and domain scores for symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Clinical remission was assessed at 12 months, defined as Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score less than 1.5, no exacerbations in the previous 12 months, and no oral corticosteroids use for asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater proportion of participants achieving clinical remission had AQLQ(S) scores of greater than or equal to 6 at 12 months compared with those who did not: overall scores (61.9% vs 26.6%, P = .001), symptom domain (59.5% vs 29.7%, P = .004), activity limitation domain (59.5% vs 28.1%, P = .003), emotional function domain (69.0% vs 31.2%, P < .001), and environmental stimuli domain (57.1% vs 34.4%, P = .035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving clinical remission at 12 months was associated with minimal or no impairment in HRQoL, although approximately 38% of participants in remission still experienced impaired HRQoL, highlighting residual unmet needs. Further research is needed to better understand the benefits of asthma remission from the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The AMR is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001497291). The AMR is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational registry for the postmarketing surveillance of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. The AMR is approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees in the study sites, and all participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物制剂可诱导重症哮喘的临床缓解。然而,从患者的角度来看,获得缓解的好处仍然不清楚。目的:评估mepolizumab治疗的重度嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘患者临床缓解与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关系。方法:在这项巢式匹配的病例对照研究中,使用来自澳大利亚Mepolizumab Registry的数据来比较42名在12个月时达到临床缓解的参与者和64名倾向评分匹配的未达到临床缓解的参与者中达到哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ(S))评分≥6分的参与者的比例,AQLQ(S)评分表明HRQoL最低或无损害。评估的AQLQ(S)评分包括症状、活动限制、情绪功能和环境刺激的总体和领域评分。结果:与未达到临床缓解的受试者相比,达到临床缓解的受试者在12个月时AQLQ(S)评分≥6的比例更高:总体评分(61.9% vs 26.6%, p = 0.001)、症状领域(59.5% vs 29.7%, p = 0.004)、活动限制领域(59.5% vs 28.1%, p = 0.003)、情绪功能领域(69.0% vs 31.2%, p结论:在12个月达到临床缓解与HRQoL的最小损害或无损害相关,尽管大约38%的缓解参与者仍然经历了HRQoL受损,突出了剩余未满足的需求。需要进一步的研究来更好地从患者的角度理解哮喘缓解的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of clinical remission on quality of life in severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab.

Background: Biologics can induce clinical remission in severe asthma. However, the benefits of achieving remission from the patient's perspective remain unclear.

Objective: To assess the association between achieving clinical remission and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab.

Methods: In this nested, matched case-control study, data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry (AMR) were used to compare the proportions of participants attaining Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]) scores of greater than or equal to 6, indicating minimal or no HRQoL impairment, between 42 participants who achieved clinical remission at 12 months and 64 propensity score-matched participants who did not. Assessed AQLQ(S) scores included overall and domain scores for symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Clinical remission was assessed at 12 months, defined as Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score less than 1.5, no exacerbations in the previous 12 months, and no oral corticosteroids use for asthma.

Results: A greater proportion of participants achieving clinical remission had AQLQ(S) scores of greater than or equal to 6 at 12 months compared with those who did not: overall scores (61.9% vs 26.6%, P = .001), symptom domain (59.5% vs 29.7%, P = .004), activity limitation domain (59.5% vs 28.1%, P = .003), emotional function domain (69.0% vs 31.2%, P < .001), and environmental stimuli domain (57.1% vs 34.4%, P = .035).

Conclusion: Achieving clinical remission at 12 months was associated with minimal or no impairment in HRQoL, although approximately 38% of participants in remission still experienced impaired HRQoL, highlighting residual unmet needs. Further research is needed to better understand the benefits of asthma remission from the patient's perspective.

Clinical trial registration: The AMR is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001497291). The AMR is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational registry for the postmarketing surveillance of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. The AMR is approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees in the study sites, and all participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信