{"title":"痴呆症患者的社会心理健康:系统回顾和结构分析。","authors":"Lena M Hofbauer, Francisca S Rodriguez","doi":"10.1017/neu.2025.10021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychosocial wellbeing is increasingly recognised as a key outcome in dementia research and care, reflecting a shift towards person-centred care and patient-reported outcome measures. However, progress is hindered by a lack of a clear and consistent definition. The present systematic review aimed to establish how previous dementia research has defined the term and how existing definitions may be unified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in <i>PubMed</i>, <i>Embase</i>, and <i>Web of Science</i> using only the term 'psychosocial' as well as terms related to dementia in the search string. Two blinded reviewers independently conducted the abstracts screening, full-text screening. Definitions used in included records were extracted and their content grouped into categories and domains. For papers presenting empirical findings, quality screening was performed using <i>Critical Appraisal Skills Programme</i> (CASP) checklists and findings were narratively summarised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n=36 records were identified that provided a definition for psychosocial wellbeing. Conceptualizations most commonly (86 %) included emotional wellbeing, social health (64%), behavioural symptoms (44%), and subjective lived wellbeing (42%). A total of n=23 records also contained empirical data, which indicated that psychosocial wellbeing may be improved by several interventions such as tailored activities and validation group therapies, among others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The construct of 'psychosocial wellbeing' as currently used in dementia research predominantly incorporates emotional and subjective lived wellbeing, social health, and behavioural symptoms. This indicates an emerging consensus. To progress dementia research and care practice, it is essential that future studies use a common operationalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial wellbeing of people with dementia: Systematic review and construct analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lena M Hofbauer, Francisca S Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/neu.2025.10021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychosocial wellbeing is increasingly recognised as a key outcome in dementia research and care, reflecting a shift towards person-centred care and patient-reported outcome measures. However, progress is hindered by a lack of a clear and consistent definition. The present systematic review aimed to establish how previous dementia research has defined the term and how existing definitions may be unified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in <i>PubMed</i>, <i>Embase</i>, and <i>Web of Science</i> using only the term 'psychosocial' as well as terms related to dementia in the search string. Two blinded reviewers independently conducted the abstracts screening, full-text screening. Definitions used in included records were extracted and their content grouped into categories and domains. For papers presenting empirical findings, quality screening was performed using <i>Critical Appraisal Skills Programme</i> (CASP) checklists and findings were narratively summarised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n=36 records were identified that provided a definition for psychosocial wellbeing. Conceptualizations most commonly (86 %) included emotional wellbeing, social health (64%), behavioural symptoms (44%), and subjective lived wellbeing (42%). A total of n=23 records also contained empirical data, which indicated that psychosocial wellbeing may be improved by several interventions such as tailored activities and validation group therapies, among others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The construct of 'psychosocial wellbeing' as currently used in dementia research predominantly incorporates emotional and subjective lived wellbeing, social health, and behavioural symptoms. This indicates an emerging consensus. To progress dementia research and care practice, it is essential that future studies use a common operationalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropsychiatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropsychiatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2025.10021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2025.10021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:社会心理健康越来越被认为是痴呆症研究和护理的一个关键成果,反映了向以人为本的护理和患者报告的结果措施的转变。然而,由于缺乏明确和一致的定义,进展受到阻碍。目前的系统综述旨在确定以前的痴呆症研究如何定义该术语以及如何统一现有的定义。方法:在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science中进行系统的文献综述,在搜索字符串中仅使用术语“社会心理”以及与痴呆相关的术语。两名盲法审稿人独立进行摘要筛选和全文筛选。提取所包含记录中使用的定义,并将其内容分组到类别和域中。对于提出实证结果的论文,使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)检查清单进行质量筛选,并对结果进行叙述性总结。结果:共确定了n=36条记录,提供了社会心理健康的定义。最常见的概念(86%)包括情绪健康、社会健康(64%)、行为症状(44%)和主观生活幸福(42%)。共有n=23条记录还包含经验数据,这些数据表明,社会心理健康可以通过几种干预措施得到改善,例如量身定制的活动和验证小组治疗等。讨论:目前在痴呆症研究中使用的“社会心理健康”结构主要包括情感和主观生活健康、社会健康和行为症状。这表明一种正在形成的共识。为了推进痴呆研究和护理实践,未来的研究使用共同的操作化是至关重要的。
Psychosocial wellbeing of people with dementia: Systematic review and construct analysis.
Objective: Psychosocial wellbeing is increasingly recognised as a key outcome in dementia research and care, reflecting a shift towards person-centred care and patient-reported outcome measures. However, progress is hindered by a lack of a clear and consistent definition. The present systematic review aimed to establish how previous dementia research has defined the term and how existing definitions may be unified.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science using only the term 'psychosocial' as well as terms related to dementia in the search string. Two blinded reviewers independently conducted the abstracts screening, full-text screening. Definitions used in included records were extracted and their content grouped into categories and domains. For papers presenting empirical findings, quality screening was performed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists and findings were narratively summarised.
Results: A total of n=36 records were identified that provided a definition for psychosocial wellbeing. Conceptualizations most commonly (86 %) included emotional wellbeing, social health (64%), behavioural symptoms (44%), and subjective lived wellbeing (42%). A total of n=23 records also contained empirical data, which indicated that psychosocial wellbeing may be improved by several interventions such as tailored activities and validation group therapies, among others.
Discussion: The construct of 'psychosocial wellbeing' as currently used in dementia research predominantly incorporates emotional and subjective lived wellbeing, social health, and behavioural symptoms. This indicates an emerging consensus. To progress dementia research and care practice, it is essential that future studies use a common operationalization.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.