韩国全国肺癌管理质量评估:基于第二周期健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)评估。

IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Seunghun Lee, So-Yun Kim, Cheol-Kyu Park, Seong-Hoon Yoon, Chaeuk Chung, Sung Yong Lee
{"title":"韩国全国肺癌管理质量评估:基于第二周期健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)评估。","authors":"Seunghun Lee, So-Yun Kim, Cheol-Kyu Park, Seong-Hoon Yoon, Chaeuk Chung, Sung Yong Lee","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. To improve lung cancer care quality, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in Korea conducted the first phase of the second-cycle adequacy assessment, incorporating patient-centered and outcome-based indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed HIRA claims data from 106 medical institutions treating lung cancer between July 2022 and June 2023. The assessment evaluated treatment adequacy based on structural, procedural, and outcome indicators across tertiary care hospitals, general hospitals, and clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The second-cycle evaluation adopted a comprehensive framework, incorporating multidisciplinary care and end-of-life management. Among 21,517 cases, 44 tertiary care hospitals managed 75.9%, while 62 general hospitals handled 24.1%. The average adequacy score was 91.09, with 80.7% of institutions rated Grade 1. The multidisciplinary consultation rate was 30.8%, exceeding the 12.6% target. Surgery within 30 days of diagnosis was performed in 93.2% of cases, and the overall surgical mortality rate was 1.19%, lower in tertiary care hospitals (1.04%) than in general hospitals (1.88%). The 30-day readmission rate was 2.26%, and 56.8% of patients received hospice counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The second-cycle assessment emphasized patient-centered and outcome-based care, integrating multidisciplinary consultation and hospice indicators. These findings suggest that lung cancer treatment institutions in South Korea maintain high adequacy standards. Continuous improvements will be necessary to align with medical advancements and enhance lung cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Quality Assessment of Lung Cancer Management in Korea: Based on Second-Cycle Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Seunghun Lee, So-Yun Kim, Cheol-Kyu Park, Seong-Hoon Yoon, Chaeuk Chung, Sung Yong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4046/trd.2025.0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. To improve lung cancer care quality, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in Korea conducted the first phase of the second-cycle adequacy assessment, incorporating patient-centered and outcome-based indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed HIRA claims data from 106 medical institutions treating lung cancer between July 2022 and June 2023. The assessment evaluated treatment adequacy based on structural, procedural, and outcome indicators across tertiary care hospitals, general hospitals, and clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The second-cycle evaluation adopted a comprehensive framework, incorporating multidisciplinary care and end-of-life management. Among 21,517 cases, 44 tertiary care hospitals managed 75.9%, while 62 general hospitals handled 24.1%. The average adequacy score was 91.09, with 80.7% of institutions rated Grade 1. The multidisciplinary consultation rate was 30.8%, exceeding the 12.6% target. Surgery within 30 days of diagnosis was performed in 93.2% of cases, and the overall surgical mortality rate was 1.19%, lower in tertiary care hospitals (1.04%) than in general hospitals (1.88%). The 30-day readmission rate was 2.26%, and 56.8% of patients received hospice counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The second-cycle assessment emphasized patient-centered and outcome-based care, integrating multidisciplinary consultation and hospice indicators. These findings suggest that lung cancer treatment institutions in South Korea maintain high adequacy standards. Continuous improvements will be necessary to align with medical advancements and enhance lung cancer management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2025.0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2025.0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。为了提高肺癌治疗质量,韩国健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)进行了第二周期充分性评估的第一阶段,纳入了以患者为中心和以结果为基础的指标。方法:本研究分析了2022年7月至2023年6月106家治疗肺癌的医疗机构的HIRA索赔数据。该评估基于三级医院、综合医院和诊所的结构、程序和结果指标评估了治疗的充分性。结果:第二周期评估采用综合框架,结合多学科护理和临终管理。在21,517例病例中,44家三级医院管理75.9%,62家综合医院管理24.1%。平均充足率为91.09分,80.7%的机构被评为一级。多学科会诊率30.8%,超过目标12.6%。93.2%的病例在确诊后30天内进行手术,手术总死亡率为1.19%,三级医院(1.04%)低于综合医院(1.88%)。30天再入院率为2.26%,接受安宁疗护辅导的患者占56.8%。结论:第二周期评估强调以患者为中心、以结果为基础的护理,整合多学科会诊和安宁疗护指标。这些发现表明,韩国的肺癌治疗机构保持着较高的充分性标准。为了配合医疗进步和加强肺癌管理,需要不断改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide Quality Assessment of Lung Cancer Management in Korea: Based on Second-Cycle Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) Evaluation.

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. To improve lung cancer care quality, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in Korea conducted the first phase of the second-cycle adequacy assessment, incorporating patient-centered and outcome-based indicators.

Methods: This study analyzed HIRA claims data from 106 medical institutions treating lung cancer between July 2022 and June 2023. The assessment evaluated treatment adequacy based on structural, procedural, and outcome indicators across tertiary care hospitals, general hospitals, and clinics.

Results: The second-cycle evaluation adopted a comprehensive framework, incorporating multidisciplinary care and end-of-life management. Among 21,517 cases, 44 tertiary care hospitals managed 75.9%, while 62 general hospitals handled 24.1%. The average adequacy score was 91.09, with 80.7% of institutions rated Grade 1. The multidisciplinary consultation rate was 30.8%, exceeding the 12.6% target. Surgery within 30 days of diagnosis was performed in 93.2% of cases, and the overall surgical mortality rate was 1.19%, lower in tertiary care hospitals (1.04%) than in general hospitals (1.88%). The 30-day readmission rate was 2.26%, and 56.8% of patients received hospice counseling.

Conclusion: The second-cycle assessment emphasized patient-centered and outcome-based care, integrating multidisciplinary consultation and hospice indicators. These findings suggest that lung cancer treatment institutions in South Korea maintain high adequacy standards. Continuous improvements will be necessary to align with medical advancements and enhance lung cancer management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信