在牙科期刊中使用和承认人工智能的编辑政策。

IF 4.8 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105923

Ana Beatriz L. Queiroz, Letícia Regina Morello Sartori, Giana da Silveira Lima, Rafael R. Moraes

{"title":"在牙科期刊中使用和承认人工智能的编辑政策。","authors":"Ana Beatriz L. Queiroz, Letícia Regina Morello Sartori, Giana da Silveira Lima, Rafael R. Moraes","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study mapped the editorial policies regarding the use and acknowledgment of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental journals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dental journals indexed in Web of Science were analyzed. Editorial guidelines and instructions for authors and reviewers were assessed. The outcome of interest was whether a journal reported an AI policy. Exposures of interest were Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), total number of citations, and percentage of open access content. Associations between journal metrics and the presence of AI policies were assessed using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. Adjusted models were developed separately for JIF and JCI, including variables with <em>p</em> ≤ 0.2. Significance was set at <em>p</em> ≤ 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 158 journals analyzed, 70.9 % reported AI policies. Policies targeted authors (100 %), reviewers (88.4 %), and editors (46.4 %). The most common areas addressed were authorship, language review, and writing assistance. Journals in the upper quartiles of JIF and JCI were about twice as likely to report an AI policy compared to those in the lowest quartile. In the adjusted models, no association was found between total citations and AI policy presence, whereas open access percentage showed a negative association. While AI tools are permitted to aid in language refinement, critical tasks were consistently required to remain human-led, with rare exceptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI-related editorial policies were frequent in dental journals, and higher-impact journals were statistically more likely to report such policies.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Clearer and more standardized AI policies may promote transparency and ethical AI use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial policies for use and acknowledgment of artificial intelligence in dental journals\",\"authors\":\"Ana Beatriz L. Queiroz, Letícia Regina Morello Sartori, Giana da Silveira Lima, Rafael R. Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study mapped the editorial policies regarding the use and acknowledgment of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental journals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dental journals indexed in Web of Science were analyzed. Editorial guidelines and instructions for authors and reviewers were assessed. The outcome of interest was whether a journal reported an AI policy. Exposures of interest were Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), total number of citations, and percentage of open access content. Associations between journal metrics and the presence of AI policies were assessed using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. Adjusted models were developed separately for JIF and JCI, including variables with <em>p</em> ≤ 0.2. Significance was set at <em>p</em> ≤ 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 158 journals analyzed, 70.9 % reported AI policies. Policies targeted authors (100 %), reviewers (88.4 %), and editors (46.4 %). The most common areas addressed were authorship, language review, and writing assistance. Journals in the upper quartiles of JIF and JCI were about twice as likely to report an AI policy compared to those in the lowest quartile. In the adjusted models, no association was found between total citations and AI policy presence, whereas open access percentage showed a negative association. While AI tools are permitted to aid in language refinement, critical tasks were consistently required to remain human-led, with rare exceptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI-related editorial policies were frequent in dental journals, and higher-impact journals were statistically more likely to report such policies.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Clearer and more standardized AI policies may promote transparency and ethical AI use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225003677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225003677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：本研究绘制了关于在牙科期刊中使用和承认人工智能（AI）的编辑政策。方法：对Web of Science收录的牙科期刊进行分析。对作者和审稿人的编辑指南和说明进行了评估。感兴趣的结果是期刊是否报道了人工智能政策。感兴趣的暴露是期刊影响因子（JIF）、期刊引用指标（JCI）、总引用次数和开放获取内容的百分比。使用具有稳健标准误差的泊松回归模型评估期刊指标与人工智能政策之间的关联。JIF和JCI分别建立调整模型，包括p≤0.2的变量。p≤0.05为显著性。结果：在所分析的158种期刊中，有70.9%的期刊报道了人工智能政策。政策的目标是作者（100%）、审稿人（88.4%）和编辑（46.4%）。最常见的领域是作者身份、语言审查和写作协助。JIF和JCI排名靠前的期刊报告人工智能政策的可能性是排名靠后的期刊的两倍。在调整后的模型中，总引用与人工智能政策存在之间没有关联，而开放获取百分比则呈负相关。虽然允许人工智能工具帮助改进语言，但关键任务始终要求由人类主导，很少有例外。结论：与人工智能相关的编辑政策在牙科期刊中很常见，从统计上看，高影响力的期刊更有可能报道此类政策。临床意义：更清晰、更规范的人工智能政策可以促进人工智能使用的透明度和伦理性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Editorial policies for use and acknowledgment of artificial intelligence in dental journals

Objectives

This study mapped the editorial policies regarding the use and acknowledgment of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental journals.

Methods

Dental journals indexed in Web of Science were analyzed. Editorial guidelines and instructions for authors and reviewers were assessed. The outcome of interest was whether a journal reported an AI policy. Exposures of interest were Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), total number of citations, and percentage of open access content. Associations between journal metrics and the presence of AI policies were assessed using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. Adjusted models were developed separately for JIF and JCI, including variables with p ≤ 0.2. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Among the 158 journals analyzed, 70.9 % reported AI policies. Policies targeted authors (100 %), reviewers (88.4 %), and editors (46.4 %). The most common areas addressed were authorship, language review, and writing assistance. Journals in the upper quartiles of JIF and JCI were about twice as likely to report an AI policy compared to those in the lowest quartile. In the adjusted models, no association was found between total citations and AI policy presence, whereas open access percentage showed a negative association. While AI tools are permitted to aid in language refinement, critical tasks were consistently required to remain human-led, with rare exceptions.

Conclusion

AI-related editorial policies were frequent in dental journals, and higher-impact journals were statistically more likely to report such policies.

Clinical significance

Clearer and more standardized AI policies may promote transparency and ethical AI use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

11.40%

发文量

349

审稿时长

35 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.