巴伐利亚全科医生处方维生素k拮抗剂与直接口服抗凝剂:一项定性研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-06-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251341083
Nikoletta Zeschick, Julia Gollnick, Julia Muth, Franziska Hörbrand, Peter Killian, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião
{"title":"巴伐利亚全科医生处方维生素k拮抗剂与直接口服抗凝剂:一项定性研究。","authors":"Nikoletta Zeschick, Julia Gollnick, Julia Muth, Franziska Hörbrand, Peter Killian, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião","doi":"10.1177/11786329251341083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed instead of vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) although VKAs cost considerably less than DOACs. In 2014, a new system for drug expenditures, the Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV, Active substance agreement), was implemented in Bavaria, Germany to control pharmaceutical expenditures transparently. Achieving the targets for the VKAs set by the WSV was difficult for general practitioners (GPs). We explored the determinants of prescribing VKAs (specifically phenprocoumon) versus DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews (n = 18) and two small group discussions (n = 10) were conducted with GPs. For the qualitative content analysis, we formed a system of categories based on the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants actively weighed various factors when deciding between prescribing phenprocoumon or DOACs. Costs played a subordinate role although all participants were aware that DOACs come at a higher cost than phenprocoumon. Trend reports served as a tool for GPs to assess their prescribing practices, however did not lead to a change in prescribing behaviour. The interviewees had a very heterogeneous view of safety, effect, and evidence of phenprocoumon or DOACs. The cooperation of the patients is crucial. Time is a significant challenge for participants when initiating patients on or switching them to phenprocoumon, which is especially problematic as all of the patients discharged from the hospital are put on DOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs are caught between economic requirements, patients' wishes, and good collegial cooperation when deciding for or against phenprocoumon. As oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is mostly initiated in the hospital, and as physicians almost exclusively prescribe DOACs there, participating GPs feel overchallenged in reaching the targets set by the WSV.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Main ID: DRKS00019820 (German Register of Clinical Studies and World Health Organization).</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251341083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nikoletta Zeschick, Julia Gollnick, Julia Muth, Franziska Hörbrand, Peter Killian, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786329251341083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed instead of vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) although VKAs cost considerably less than DOACs. In 2014, a new system for drug expenditures, the Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV, Active substance agreement), was implemented in Bavaria, Germany to control pharmaceutical expenditures transparently. Achieving the targets for the VKAs set by the WSV was difficult for general practitioners (GPs). We explored the determinants of prescribing VKAs (specifically phenprocoumon) versus DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews (n = 18) and two small group discussions (n = 10) were conducted with GPs. For the qualitative content analysis, we formed a system of categories based on the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants actively weighed various factors when deciding between prescribing phenprocoumon or DOACs. Costs played a subordinate role although all participants were aware that DOACs come at a higher cost than phenprocoumon. Trend reports served as a tool for GPs to assess their prescribing practices, however did not lead to a change in prescribing behaviour. The interviewees had a very heterogeneous view of safety, effect, and evidence of phenprocoumon or DOACs. The cooperation of the patients is crucial. Time is a significant challenge for participants when initiating patients on or switching them to phenprocoumon, which is especially problematic as all of the patients discharged from the hospital are put on DOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs are caught between economic requirements, patients' wishes, and good collegial cooperation when deciding for or against phenprocoumon. As oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is mostly initiated in the hospital, and as physicians almost exclusively prescribe DOACs there, participating GPs feel overchallenged in reaching the targets set by the WSV.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Main ID: DRKS00019820 (German Register of Clinical Studies and World Health Organization).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"11786329251341083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182603/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251341083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251341083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已越来越多地取代维生素k拮抗剂(VKA),尽管VKA的成本远低于DOACs。2014年,德国巴伐利亚州实施了一项新的药品支出制度,即Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV,原药协议),以透明地控制药品支出。对于全科医生(gp)来说,实现WSV设定的vka目标是困难的。我们探讨了处方vka(特别是phenprocoumon)与doac的决定因素。方法:对全科医生进行定性访谈(n = 18)和2次小组讨论(n = 10)。对于定性内容分析,我们基于理论领域框架(TDF)的领域形成了一个类别系统。结果:参与者在决定处方phenprocoumon或DOACs时积极权衡各种因素。尽管所有参与者都意识到doac的成本高于phenprocoumon,但成本起着次要作用。趋势报告作为全科医生评估其处方做法的工具,但并未导致处方行为的改变。受访者对phenprocoumon或DOACs的安全性、效果和证据的看法非常不同。病人的合作是至关重要的。对于参与者来说,在让患者开始使用或改用phenprocoumon时,时间是一个重大挑战,因为所有出院的患者都在使用doac,这一点尤其成问题。结论:全科医生在决定是否使用phenprocoumon时,在经济需求、患者意愿和良好的合作之间进退两难。由于口服抗凝治疗(OAC)大多是在医院开始的,而且医生几乎只在医院开doac,参与的全科医生在达到WSV设定的目标方面感到挑战过大。试验注册号:主ID: DRKS00019820(德国临床研究和世界卫生组织注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.

Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.

Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.

Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed instead of vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) although VKAs cost considerably less than DOACs. In 2014, a new system for drug expenditures, the Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV, Active substance agreement), was implemented in Bavaria, Germany to control pharmaceutical expenditures transparently. Achieving the targets for the VKAs set by the WSV was difficult for general practitioners (GPs). We explored the determinants of prescribing VKAs (specifically phenprocoumon) versus DOACs.

Methods: Qualitative interviews (n = 18) and two small group discussions (n = 10) were conducted with GPs. For the qualitative content analysis, we formed a system of categories based on the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

Results: Participants actively weighed various factors when deciding between prescribing phenprocoumon or DOACs. Costs played a subordinate role although all participants were aware that DOACs come at a higher cost than phenprocoumon. Trend reports served as a tool for GPs to assess their prescribing practices, however did not lead to a change in prescribing behaviour. The interviewees had a very heterogeneous view of safety, effect, and evidence of phenprocoumon or DOACs. The cooperation of the patients is crucial. Time is a significant challenge for participants when initiating patients on or switching them to phenprocoumon, which is especially problematic as all of the patients discharged from the hospital are put on DOACs.

Conclusions: GPs are caught between economic requirements, patients' wishes, and good collegial cooperation when deciding for or against phenprocoumon. As oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is mostly initiated in the hospital, and as physicians almost exclusively prescribe DOACs there, participating GPs feel overchallenged in reaching the targets set by the WSV.

Trial registration number: Main ID: DRKS00019820 (German Register of Clinical Studies and World Health Organization).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信