CT δ放射组学预测脊柱肿瘤手术中输血和大出血的风险。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Suwei Liu, Yali Li, Shuai Tian, Chenyu Jiang, Ming Ni, Ke Xu, Feng Wei, Huishu Yuan
{"title":"CT δ放射组学预测脊柱肿瘤手术中输血和大出血的风险。","authors":"Suwei Liu, Yali Li, Shuai Tian, Chenyu Jiang, Ming Ni, Ke Xu, Feng Wei, Huishu Yuan","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00900-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative bleeding is a serious complication of spinal tumor surgery. Preoperative identification of patients at high risk of intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) and intraoperative massive bleeding (IMB) before spinal tumor resection surgery is difficult but critical for surgical planning and blood management. This study aims to develop and validate delta radiomics prediction models for IBT and IMB in spinal tumor surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with spinal tumors who underwent spinal tumor resection surgery were retrospectively recruited. CT, CTE, delta, and clinical models based on CT native phase, CT arterial phase images, and clinical factors were constructed using 10-fold cross-validation and logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) in the training cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of these models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>231 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 161) and test (n = 70) cohorts, comprising 146 IBT and 85 no-IBT patients, 35 IMB and 196 no-IMB patients, respectively. The delta model performed best in predicting IBT and IMB risk, with better predictive ability than the clinical model (IDI = 0.11-0.13 for IBT, and IDI = 0.02-0.08 for IMB, p < 0.05, respectively). Calibration curves indicated that the predicted probabilities of IBT and IMB in the model did not differ significantly from the actual probabilities (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CT delta model we constructed may be a valuable tool to improve risk stratification before spinal tumor surgery, thus contributing to preoperative planning and improving patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered (M2020435).</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CT delta-radiomics predicts the risks of blood transfusion and massive bleeding during spinal tumor surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Suwei Liu, Yali Li, Shuai Tian, Chenyu Jiang, Ming Ni, Ke Xu, Feng Wei, Huishu Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-025-00900-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative bleeding is a serious complication of spinal tumor surgery. Preoperative identification of patients at high risk of intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) and intraoperative massive bleeding (IMB) before spinal tumor resection surgery is difficult but critical for surgical planning and blood management. This study aims to develop and validate delta radiomics prediction models for IBT and IMB in spinal tumor surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with spinal tumors who underwent spinal tumor resection surgery were retrospectively recruited. CT, CTE, delta, and clinical models based on CT native phase, CT arterial phase images, and clinical factors were constructed using 10-fold cross-validation and logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) in the training cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of these models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>231 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 161) and test (n = 70) cohorts, comprising 146 IBT and 85 no-IBT patients, 35 IMB and 196 no-IMB patients, respectively. The delta model performed best in predicting IBT and IMB risk, with better predictive ability than the clinical model (IDI = 0.11-0.13 for IBT, and IDI = 0.02-0.08 for IMB, p < 0.05, respectively). Calibration curves indicated that the predicted probabilities of IBT and IMB in the model did not differ significantly from the actual probabilities (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CT delta model we constructed may be a valuable tool to improve risk stratification before spinal tumor surgery, thus contributing to preoperative planning and improving patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered (M2020435).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00900-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00900-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术中出血是脊柱肿瘤手术的严重并发症。脊柱肿瘤切除术前术中输血(IBT)和术中大出血(IMB)高危患者的术前识别是困难的,但对手术计划和血液管理至关重要。本研究旨在建立和验证脊柱肿瘤手术中IBT和IMB的δ放射组学预测模型。方法:回顾性收集诊断为脊柱肿瘤并行脊柱肿瘤切除术的患者。在训练队列中,采用10倍交叉验证、逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)构建基于CT原生期、CT动脉期图像和临床因素的CT、CTE、delta和临床模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、综合判别改善(IDI)、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来评价和比较这些模型的诊断性能。结果:231例患者随机分为训练组(n = 161)和试验组(n = 70),其中IBT组146例,非IBT组85例,IMB组35例,非IMB组196例。delta模型对IBT和IMB风险的预测效果最好,预测能力优于临床模型(IBT的IDI = 0.11-0.13, IMB的IDI = 0.02-0.08, p 0.05)。结论:建立的CT delta模型可作为脊柱肿瘤手术前风险分层的有效工具,有助于术前规划和改善患者预后。试验注册:回顾性注册(M2020435)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CT delta-radiomics predicts the risks of blood transfusion and massive bleeding during spinal tumor surgery.

CT delta-radiomics predicts the risks of blood transfusion and massive bleeding during spinal tumor surgery.

CT delta-radiomics predicts the risks of blood transfusion and massive bleeding during spinal tumor surgery.

CT delta-radiomics predicts the risks of blood transfusion and massive bleeding during spinal tumor surgery.

Background: Intraoperative bleeding is a serious complication of spinal tumor surgery. Preoperative identification of patients at high risk of intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) and intraoperative massive bleeding (IMB) before spinal tumor resection surgery is difficult but critical for surgical planning and blood management. This study aims to develop and validate delta radiomics prediction models for IBT and IMB in spinal tumor surgery.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with spinal tumors who underwent spinal tumor resection surgery were retrospectively recruited. CT, CTE, delta, and clinical models based on CT native phase, CT arterial phase images, and clinical factors were constructed using 10-fold cross-validation and logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) in the training cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of these models.

Results: 231 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 161) and test (n = 70) cohorts, comprising 146 IBT and 85 no-IBT patients, 35 IMB and 196 no-IMB patients, respectively. The delta model performed best in predicting IBT and IMB risk, with better predictive ability than the clinical model (IDI = 0.11-0.13 for IBT, and IDI = 0.02-0.08 for IMB, p < 0.05, respectively). Calibration curves indicated that the predicted probabilities of IBT and IMB in the model did not differ significantly from the actual probabilities (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The CT delta model we constructed may be a valuable tool to improve risk stratification before spinal tumor surgery, thus contributing to preoperative planning and improving patient prognosis.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered (M2020435).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信