Mikko Hellgren, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Katarina Hedin, Stefan Jansson, Staffan Nilsson, Gunnar Nilsson, Per Wändell, Patrik Wennberg
{"title":"在瑞典初级保健中,高血压管理诊断指南的依从性存在很大差异","authors":"Mikko Hellgren, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Katarina Hedin, Stefan Jansson, Staffan Nilsson, Gunnar Nilsson, Per Wändell, Patrik Wennberg","doi":"10.1111/jch.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>High blood pressure (BP) is a frequent cause for visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Sweden. Guidelines on methods for BP measurements for diagnosis of hypertension have recently been updated. We aimed to study adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management and evaluate whether adherence to guidelines was related to organizational or sociodemographic characteristics. Interviews with representatives from 76 randomly selected PHCCs from eight regions in Sweden were conducted. PHCCs’ use of 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM) and BP measurements in both arms for the diagnosis of hypertension were chosen as proxy markers for adherence to diagnostic guidelines. An adherence index was created as a composite score of these diagnostic methods. The proportion of PHCCs stating they “often use” ABPM and HBPM were 13.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and 57.3% stated they performed BP measurements in both arms. Two PHCCs did not use ABPM, HBPM or BP measurements in both arms to diagnose hypertension. None of the organizational or sociodemographic characteristics (number of listed patients, Care Need Index (CNI), geographical location, ownership, investigation primarily led by doctor/nurse, dedicated team management, special training for hypertension and local routines) were associated with the adherence index. This study shows that adherence to diagnostic guidelines vary largely between PHCCs. No organizational characteristic, not even team-based management, was associated with adherence to diagnostic guidelines. The variation raises questions about inequity healthcare and novel strategies that may be needed to improve PHCCs’ adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: 263351 [www.researchweb.org]</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Variation in Adherence to Diagnostic Guidelines in Hypertension Management in Swedish Primary Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Mikko Hellgren, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Katarina Hedin, Stefan Jansson, Staffan Nilsson, Gunnar Nilsson, Per Wändell, Patrik Wennberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>High blood pressure (BP) is a frequent cause for visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Sweden. Guidelines on methods for BP measurements for diagnosis of hypertension have recently been updated. We aimed to study adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management and evaluate whether adherence to guidelines was related to organizational or sociodemographic characteristics. Interviews with representatives from 76 randomly selected PHCCs from eight regions in Sweden were conducted. PHCCs’ use of 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM) and BP measurements in both arms for the diagnosis of hypertension were chosen as proxy markers for adherence to diagnostic guidelines. An adherence index was created as a composite score of these diagnostic methods. The proportion of PHCCs stating they “often use” ABPM and HBPM were 13.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and 57.3% stated they performed BP measurements in both arms. Two PHCCs did not use ABPM, HBPM or BP measurements in both arms to diagnose hypertension. None of the organizational or sociodemographic characteristics (number of listed patients, Care Need Index (CNI), geographical location, ownership, investigation primarily led by doctor/nurse, dedicated team management, special training for hypertension and local routines) were associated with the adherence index. This study shows that adherence to diagnostic guidelines vary largely between PHCCs. No organizational characteristic, not even team-based management, was associated with adherence to diagnostic guidelines. The variation raises questions about inequity healthcare and novel strategies that may be needed to improve PHCCs’ adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: 263351 [www.researchweb.org]</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Large Variation in Adherence to Diagnostic Guidelines in Hypertension Management in Swedish Primary Healthcare
High blood pressure (BP) is a frequent cause for visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Sweden. Guidelines on methods for BP measurements for diagnosis of hypertension have recently been updated. We aimed to study adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management and evaluate whether adherence to guidelines was related to organizational or sociodemographic characteristics. Interviews with representatives from 76 randomly selected PHCCs from eight regions in Sweden were conducted. PHCCs’ use of 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM) and BP measurements in both arms for the diagnosis of hypertension were chosen as proxy markers for adherence to diagnostic guidelines. An adherence index was created as a composite score of these diagnostic methods. The proportion of PHCCs stating they “often use” ABPM and HBPM were 13.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and 57.3% stated they performed BP measurements in both arms. Two PHCCs did not use ABPM, HBPM or BP measurements in both arms to diagnose hypertension. None of the organizational or sociodemographic characteristics (number of listed patients, Care Need Index (CNI), geographical location, ownership, investigation primarily led by doctor/nurse, dedicated team management, special training for hypertension and local routines) were associated with the adherence index. This study shows that adherence to diagnostic guidelines vary largely between PHCCs. No organizational characteristic, not even team-based management, was associated with adherence to diagnostic guidelines. The variation raises questions about inequity healthcare and novel strategies that may be needed to improve PHCCs’ adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: 263351 [www.researchweb.org]
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.