虚弱对心血管临床试验的影响

Haowen Jiang MBBS , Jie Jun Wong MBBS , Ru-San Tan MBBS , Fei Gao PhD , Louis LY. Teo MBBS , Jordan B. Strom MD, MSc , Chim C. Lang MD, PhD , Angela S. Koh MBBS, MPH, PhD
{"title":"虚弱对心血管临床试验的影响","authors":"Haowen Jiang MBBS ,&nbsp;Jie Jun Wong MBBS ,&nbsp;Ru-San Tan MBBS ,&nbsp;Fei Gao PhD ,&nbsp;Louis LY. Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Jordan B. Strom MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Chim C. Lang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Angela S. Koh MBBS, MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases are increasingly frail but rarely represented in trials. Understanding effect modification by frailty on CV trials is critical as it could help define treatment strategies in frail patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This meta-analysis aims to assess the implications of frailty on CV outcomes in clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of frailty in the context of CV trials were included (<span><span>CRD42024528279</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). Outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, CV mortality, hospitalizations, and frailty-specific outcomes (physical, quality of life, and frailty scores). HRs and 95% CIs were pooled for clinical endpoints, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for frailty-specific outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty unique randomized controlled trials were included with a pooled total of 87,711 participants. Frail patients had a significantly increased risk of MACE (HR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.87-2.91], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 83%), all-cause mortality (HR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.80-3.05], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%), CV mortality (HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.60-1.93], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and hospitalizations (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.65-3.43], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%) compared to nonfrail patients. In the frailest group, trial interventions decreased MACE (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74-0.88], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and hospitalization (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.90], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) risks with no significant difference in mortality risk (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) compared with the control group. Trial interventions significantly improved physical (SMD: 0.15, 0.04-0.26) and quality of life (SMD: 0.15, 0.09-0.21) but not frailty scores (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While frailty prognosticated a higher risk of CV events and mortality, frailty did not reduce treatment efficacy. CV trial interventions appear beneficial even in the frailest group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 7","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Frailty on Cardiovascular Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"Haowen Jiang MBBS ,&nbsp;Jie Jun Wong MBBS ,&nbsp;Ru-San Tan MBBS ,&nbsp;Fei Gao PhD ,&nbsp;Louis LY. Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Jordan B. Strom MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Chim C. Lang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Angela S. Koh MBBS, MPH, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases are increasingly frail but rarely represented in trials. Understanding effect modification by frailty on CV trials is critical as it could help define treatment strategies in frail patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This meta-analysis aims to assess the implications of frailty on CV outcomes in clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of frailty in the context of CV trials were included (<span><span>CRD42024528279</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). Outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, CV mortality, hospitalizations, and frailty-specific outcomes (physical, quality of life, and frailty scores). HRs and 95% CIs were pooled for clinical endpoints, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for frailty-specific outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty unique randomized controlled trials were included with a pooled total of 87,711 participants. Frail patients had a significantly increased risk of MACE (HR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.87-2.91], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 83%), all-cause mortality (HR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.80-3.05], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%), CV mortality (HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.60-1.93], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and hospitalizations (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.65-3.43], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%) compared to nonfrail patients. In the frailest group, trial interventions decreased MACE (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74-0.88], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and hospitalization (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.90], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) risks with no significant difference in mortality risk (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) compared with the control group. Trial interventions significantly improved physical (SMD: 0.15, 0.04-0.26) and quality of life (SMD: 0.15, 0.09-0.21) but not frailty scores (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While frailty prognosticated a higher risk of CV events and mortality, frailty did not reduce treatment efficacy. CV trial interventions appear beneficial even in the frailest group.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC advances\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 101889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管(CV)疾病患者越来越虚弱,但在临床试验中很少出现。了解虚弱对心血管试验的影响是至关重要的,因为它可以帮助确定虚弱患者的治疗策略。目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估临床试验中虚弱对CV结果的影响。方法纳入在CV试验背景下检查虚弱影响的随机对照试验(CRD42024528279)。结果包括主要心脏不良事件(MACE)、全因死亡率、CV死亡率、住院率和虚弱特异性结果(身体、生活质量和虚弱评分)。合并hr和95% ci作为临床终点,并计算虚弱特异性结局的标准化平均差异(SMDs)。结果纳入30项独特的随机对照试验,共纳入87,711名受试者。体弱患者发生MACE的风险显著增加(HR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.87-2.91], P <;0.001, I2 = 83%),全因死亡率(HR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.80-3.05], P <;0.01, I2 = 75%), CV死亡率(HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.60-1.93], P <;0.001, I2 = 0%),住院率(HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.65-3.43], P <;0.001, I2 = 92%)。在最虚弱组,试验干预降低了MACE (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74-0.88], P <;0.001, I2 = 0%)和住院率(HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.90], P <;0.001, I2 = 0%)的风险,死亡风险无显著差异(P >;0.05),与对照组比较。试验干预显著改善了身体(SMD: 0.15, 0.04-0.26)和生活质量(SMD: 0.15, 0.09-0.21),但没有改善虚弱评分(P >;0.05)。结论:虽然虚弱预示着更高的心血管事件和死亡率风险,但虚弱并不会降低治疗效果。即使在最虚弱的人群中,CV试验干预措施似乎也是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Frailty on Cardiovascular Clinical Trials

Background

Patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases are increasingly frail but rarely represented in trials. Understanding effect modification by frailty on CV trials is critical as it could help define treatment strategies in frail patients.

Objectives

This meta-analysis aims to assess the implications of frailty on CV outcomes in clinical trials.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of frailty in the context of CV trials were included (CRD42024528279). Outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, CV mortality, hospitalizations, and frailty-specific outcomes (physical, quality of life, and frailty scores). HRs and 95% CIs were pooled for clinical endpoints, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for frailty-specific outcomes.

Results

Thirty unique randomized controlled trials were included with a pooled total of 87,711 participants. Frail patients had a significantly increased risk of MACE (HR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.87-2.91], P < 0.001, I2 = 83%), all-cause mortality (HR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.80-3.05], P < 0.01, I2 = 75%), CV mortality (HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.60-1.93], P < 0.001, I2 = 0%), and hospitalizations (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.65-3.43], P < 0.001, I2 = 92%) compared to nonfrail patients. In the frailest group, trial interventions decreased MACE (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74-0.88], P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and hospitalization (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.90], P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) risks with no significant difference in mortality risk (P > 0.05) compared with the control group. Trial interventions significantly improved physical (SMD: 0.15, 0.04-0.26) and quality of life (SMD: 0.15, 0.09-0.21) but not frailty scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

While frailty prognosticated a higher risk of CV events and mortality, frailty did not reduce treatment efficacy. CV trial interventions appear beneficial even in the frailest group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信