g·g·辛普森对量子进化态度的转变

IF 1.8 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Harrison Payne
{"title":"g·g·辛普森对量子进化态度的转变","authors":"Harrison Payne","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper conducts a study of the published responses to a key process – quantum evolution – in G.G. Simpson's paleontological masterpiece <em>Tempo and Mode in Evolution</em> (1944), with the primary goal of revealing the reasons for Simpson's changed views, as indicated in his next book <em>Major Features of Evolution</em> (1953), on the importance of quantum evolution. I argue that the primary force that drove this change was not pressure from other leading synthesis thinkers like Mayr and Dobzhansky but rather empirical paleontological considerations. I consider the implications this has for the supposed hardening of the synthesis as defended by Stephen Jay Gould and for our understanding of the status of paleontology in the post-synthesis period. I claim that paleontology's secondary status in the immediate post-synthesis period resulted from the internal workings of paleontology and not merely pressures from allied biological disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 60-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"G.G. Simpson's changing attitude towards quantum evolution\",\"authors\":\"Harrison Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper conducts a study of the published responses to a key process – quantum evolution – in G.G. Simpson's paleontological masterpiece <em>Tempo and Mode in Evolution</em> (1944), with the primary goal of revealing the reasons for Simpson's changed views, as indicated in his next book <em>Major Features of Evolution</em> (1953), on the importance of quantum evolution. I argue that the primary force that drove this change was not pressure from other leading synthesis thinkers like Mayr and Dobzhansky but rather empirical paleontological considerations. I consider the implications this has for the supposed hardening of the synthesis as defended by Stephen Jay Gould and for our understanding of the status of paleontology in the post-synthesis period. I claim that paleontology's secondary status in the immediate post-synthesis period resulted from the internal workings of paleontology and not merely pressures from allied biological disciplines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936812500072X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936812500072X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对G.G.辛普森(G.G. Simpson)的古生物学巨著《进化的节奏与模式》(1944)中对量子进化这一关键过程的回应进行了研究,主要目的是揭示辛普森在其下一本书《进化的主要特征》(1953)中关于量子进化重要性的观点发生变化的原因。我认为,推动这种变化的主要力量不是来自其他领先的综合思想家(如迈尔和多布赞斯基)的压力,而是来自经验主义古生物学的考虑。我认为这对斯蒂芬·杰伊·古尔德(Stephen Jay Gould)所捍卫的所谓的综合硬化以及我们对后综合时期古生物学地位的理解所产生的影响。我认为,古生物学在合成后时期的次要地位是由于古生物学的内部运作,而不仅仅是来自相关生物学学科的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
G.G. Simpson's changing attitude towards quantum evolution
This paper conducts a study of the published responses to a key process – quantum evolution – in G.G. Simpson's paleontological masterpiece Tempo and Mode in Evolution (1944), with the primary goal of revealing the reasons for Simpson's changed views, as indicated in his next book Major Features of Evolution (1953), on the importance of quantum evolution. I argue that the primary force that drove this change was not pressure from other leading synthesis thinkers like Mayr and Dobzhansky but rather empirical paleontological considerations. I consider the implications this has for the supposed hardening of the synthesis as defended by Stephen Jay Gould and for our understanding of the status of paleontology in the post-synthesis period. I claim that paleontology's secondary status in the immediate post-synthesis period resulted from the internal workings of paleontology and not merely pressures from allied biological disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science is devoted to the integrated study of the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences. The editors encourage contributions both in the long-established areas of the history of the sciences and the philosophy of the sciences and in the topical areas of historiography of the sciences, the sciences in relation to gender, culture and society and the sciences in relation to arts. The Journal is international in scope and content and publishes papers from a wide range of countries and cultural traditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信