{"title":"考古学中的统计模型:一些最近的趋势和未来的观点","authors":"Enrico R. Crema","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reviews the application of statistical models in archaeology in the last decade, focusing in particular on multilevel models, statistical treatment of missing data and measurement error, and simulation-based generative inference. These techniques are designed to 1) account for the nested and hierarchical nature of the archaeological record, 2) formally integrate different forms of data uncertainties, and 3) provide a more direct inferential link between formal theory and observational data. The extent to which archaeology has engaged with these methods is variable, but it can be argued that none are currently regarded as part of the standard analytical toolkit in quantitative archaeology. The objective of this paper is to promote awareness of the existence of these techniques and highlight the consequences of ignoring the underlying problems that these statistical methods can address.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical modelling in archaeology: some recent trends and future perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Enrico R. Crema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper reviews the application of statistical models in archaeology in the last decade, focusing in particular on multilevel models, statistical treatment of missing data and measurement error, and simulation-based generative inference. These techniques are designed to 1) account for the nested and hierarchical nature of the archaeological record, 2) formally integrate different forms of data uncertainties, and 3) provide a more direct inferential link between formal theory and observational data. The extent to which archaeology has engaged with these methods is variable, but it can be argued that none are currently regarded as part of the standard analytical toolkit in quantitative archaeology. The objective of this paper is to promote awareness of the existence of these techniques and highlight the consequences of ignoring the underlying problems that these statistical methods can address.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030544032500144X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030544032500144X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Statistical modelling in archaeology: some recent trends and future perspectives
This paper reviews the application of statistical models in archaeology in the last decade, focusing in particular on multilevel models, statistical treatment of missing data and measurement error, and simulation-based generative inference. These techniques are designed to 1) account for the nested and hierarchical nature of the archaeological record, 2) formally integrate different forms of data uncertainties, and 3) provide a more direct inferential link between formal theory and observational data. The extent to which archaeology has engaged with these methods is variable, but it can be argued that none are currently regarded as part of the standard analytical toolkit in quantitative archaeology. The objective of this paper is to promote awareness of the existence of these techniques and highlight the consequences of ignoring the underlying problems that these statistical methods can address.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.