Elisabeth Stock , Andrea Martani , Olga Vinogradova , Fabienne Moser , Bernice S. Elger , Tenzin Wangmo
{"title":"“我是否应该继续这个职业?”: 2019冠状病毒病大流行期间瑞士医护人员的道德困境","authors":"Elisabeth Stock , Andrea Martani , Olga Vinogradova , Fabienne Moser , Bernice S. Elger , Tenzin Wangmo","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extraordinary situation of resource scarcity and pushed healthcare to its limits. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) faced moral and ethical challenges that served as potential triggers for moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress experiences of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in the German part of Switzerland. We utilized thematic analysis to examine the data and oriented within the relativist/constructionist framework. We identified four themes: 1) The burden of moral distress explores examples of morally distressing situations; 2) Precipitating factors encompass the underlying conditions that contributed to moral distress; 3) Mitigating factors refer to the elements that helped reduce the intensity of moral distress or, in some cases, prevented it from arising altogether; 4) Coping strategies capture how participants actively managed or adapted to experiences of moral distress. Our findings relay that the level of experienced moral distress is linked to the nature of the work as it was more commonly experienced by those with greater direct contact with patients and residents. Frontline HCPs found team support interventions – such as availability of low-threshold supervision – to be especially helpful in coping with moral distress. Participants in leadership positions expressed that teamwork in decision-making alleviated their moral burdens. Our findings highlight the need to address moral distress through national policies and pandemic preparedness plans, to protect healthcare workers and ensure healthcare system resilience in future crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Should I continue with this profession or not?”: moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among Swiss healthcare workers\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Stock , Andrea Martani , Olga Vinogradova , Fabienne Moser , Bernice S. Elger , Tenzin Wangmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extraordinary situation of resource scarcity and pushed healthcare to its limits. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) faced moral and ethical challenges that served as potential triggers for moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress experiences of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in the German part of Switzerland. We utilized thematic analysis to examine the data and oriented within the relativist/constructionist framework. We identified four themes: 1) The burden of moral distress explores examples of morally distressing situations; 2) Precipitating factors encompass the underlying conditions that contributed to moral distress; 3) Mitigating factors refer to the elements that helped reduce the intensity of moral distress or, in some cases, prevented it from arising altogether; 4) Coping strategies capture how participants actively managed or adapted to experiences of moral distress. Our findings relay that the level of experienced moral distress is linked to the nature of the work as it was more commonly experienced by those with greater direct contact with patients and residents. Frontline HCPs found team support interventions – such as availability of low-threshold supervision – to be especially helpful in coping with moral distress. Participants in leadership positions expressed that teamwork in decision-making alleviated their moral burdens. Our findings highlight the need to address moral distress through national policies and pandemic preparedness plans, to protect healthcare workers and ensure healthcare system resilience in future crises.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500068X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Should I continue with this profession or not?”: moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among Swiss healthcare workers
The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extraordinary situation of resource scarcity and pushed healthcare to its limits. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) faced moral and ethical challenges that served as potential triggers for moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress experiences of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in the German part of Switzerland. We utilized thematic analysis to examine the data and oriented within the relativist/constructionist framework. We identified four themes: 1) The burden of moral distress explores examples of morally distressing situations; 2) Precipitating factors encompass the underlying conditions that contributed to moral distress; 3) Mitigating factors refer to the elements that helped reduce the intensity of moral distress or, in some cases, prevented it from arising altogether; 4) Coping strategies capture how participants actively managed or adapted to experiences of moral distress. Our findings relay that the level of experienced moral distress is linked to the nature of the work as it was more commonly experienced by those with greater direct contact with patients and residents. Frontline HCPs found team support interventions – such as availability of low-threshold supervision – to be especially helpful in coping with moral distress. Participants in leadership positions expressed that teamwork in decision-making alleviated their moral burdens. Our findings highlight the need to address moral distress through national policies and pandemic preparedness plans, to protect healthcare workers and ensure healthcare system resilience in future crises.