为研究生共同设计基于网络的工具:参与式设计行动研究的叙述

Laura Iseut Lafrance St-Martin , Émilie Tremblay-Wragg , Sara Mathieu-Chartier , TomApp Project Collective
{"title":"为研究生共同设计基于网络的工具:参与式设计行动研究的叙述","authors":"Laura Iseut Lafrance St-Martin ,&nbsp;Émilie Tremblay-Wragg ,&nbsp;Sara Mathieu-Chartier ,&nbsp;TomApp Project Collective","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Graduate programs worldwide exhibit a high dropout rate, with numerous contributing factors. Among these, isolation and lack of writing support are significant. This methodological article explores the design process of two web applications supporting graduate students' social and academic needs. It was a collaborative user experience design project involving researchers (including research coordinators), potential users, a non-profit organization, and a web developer. We present the main phases of the study, highlighting the development challenges we faced and their resolutions. The discussion offers six key co-design process lessons to benefit future design research endeavors: 1) take the time to build team cohesion, 2) both types of co-design sessions (knowledge and descriptive) are helpful, but at different moments, 3) do not be afraid to tackle difficult problems with your co-researchers and to admit your limitations, 4) know the co-researchers’ strengths and competencies, 5) fluid communication takes time but is essential and 6) don't be afraid to politically engage your co-researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing web-based tools for graduate students: a narrative account of a participatory design action research\",\"authors\":\"Laura Iseut Lafrance St-Martin ,&nbsp;Émilie Tremblay-Wragg ,&nbsp;Sara Mathieu-Chartier ,&nbsp;TomApp Project Collective\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Graduate programs worldwide exhibit a high dropout rate, with numerous contributing factors. Among these, isolation and lack of writing support are significant. This methodological article explores the design process of two web applications supporting graduate students' social and academic needs. It was a collaborative user experience design project involving researchers (including research coordinators), potential users, a non-profit organization, and a web developer. We present the main phases of the study, highlighting the development challenges we faced and their resolutions. The discussion offers six key co-design process lessons to benefit future design research endeavors: 1) take the time to build team cohesion, 2) both types of co-design sessions (knowledge and descriptive) are helpful, but at different moments, 3) do not be afraid to tackle difficult problems with your co-researchers and to admit your limitations, 4) know the co-researchers’ strengths and competencies, 5) fluid communication takes time but is essential and 6) don't be afraid to politically engage your co-researchers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125003948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125003948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的研究生课程都有很高的辍学率,其中有许多因素。其中,孤立和缺乏写作支持是很重要的。这篇方法论文章探讨了两个支持研究生社交和学术需求的web应用程序的设计过程。这是一个协作式的用户体验设计项目,涉及研究人员(包括研究协调员)、潜在用户、非营利组织和web开发人员。我们介绍了研究的主要阶段,突出了我们面临的发展挑战及其解决办法。讨论提供了六个关键的协同设计过程经验教训,以造福未来的设计研究工作:1)花时间建立团队凝聚力,2)两种类型的共同设计会议(知识和描述性)都是有帮助的,但在不同的时刻,3)不要害怕与你的共同研究人员解决难题并承认你的局限性,4)了解共同研究人员的优势和能力,5)流畅的沟通需要时间,但是必不可少的,6)不要害怕与你的共同研究人员进行政治接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing web-based tools for graduate students: a narrative account of a participatory design action research
Graduate programs worldwide exhibit a high dropout rate, with numerous contributing factors. Among these, isolation and lack of writing support are significant. This methodological article explores the design process of two web applications supporting graduate students' social and academic needs. It was a collaborative user experience design project involving researchers (including research coordinators), potential users, a non-profit organization, and a web developer. We present the main phases of the study, highlighting the development challenges we faced and their resolutions. The discussion offers six key co-design process lessons to benefit future design research endeavors: 1) take the time to build team cohesion, 2) both types of co-design sessions (knowledge and descriptive) are helpful, but at different moments, 3) do not be afraid to tackle difficult problems with your co-researchers and to admit your limitations, 4) know the co-researchers’ strengths and competencies, 5) fluid communication takes time but is essential and 6) don't be afraid to politically engage your co-researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信