Cameron Shi Ern Tan , Keane Kang Xiang Ong , Laura Sophie Arden-Gardner , Fiqri Nur Haziq Abu Bakar , Sin Yee Lim , Amalia Ariffin , Jonathan Han Loong Kuek
{"title":"亚洲低强度认知行为疗法研究的范围综述","authors":"Cameron Shi Ern Tan , Keane Kang Xiang Ong , Laura Sophie Arden-Gardner , Fiqri Nur Haziq Abu Bakar , Sin Yee Lim , Amalia Ariffin , Jonathan Han Loong Kuek","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Mental health conditions are increasing globally, yet access to mental health services remains limited, particularly in Asia. Low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (LI-CBT) interventions offer a scalable, cost-effective approach to addressing mild-to-moderate mental health issues. However, the implementation of LI-CBT in Asia remains unclear. This scoping review examines existing research on LI-CBT in Asia, identifies research gaps, and explores the extent of cultural adaptations made to these interventions, providing an overview of the literature and highlighting future research and practice avenues.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adopting the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2024. Primary research studies conducted in Asia that employed LI-CBT interventions according to a formal framework for classifying these programs were included. Data were charted and analyzed to identify key themes in various study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and cultural adaptations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 studies from 12 Asian countries were identified, with Japan and China contributing the most research. Most studies reported positive outcomes; research gaps remain due to the heterogeneity of implementation, small sample sizes, inadequate controls, short follow-up periods, and inconsistent cultural adaptations beyond language translation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LI-CBT holds promise for improving mental health accessibility in Asia. However, further research is needed to enhance cultural adaptation considerations and create standardized intervention frameworks that can be modified for use in diverse populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy studies across Asia\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Shi Ern Tan , Keane Kang Xiang Ong , Laura Sophie Arden-Gardner , Fiqri Nur Haziq Abu Bakar , Sin Yee Lim , Amalia Ariffin , Jonathan Han Loong Kuek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Mental health conditions are increasing globally, yet access to mental health services remains limited, particularly in Asia. Low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (LI-CBT) interventions offer a scalable, cost-effective approach to addressing mild-to-moderate mental health issues. However, the implementation of LI-CBT in Asia remains unclear. This scoping review examines existing research on LI-CBT in Asia, identifies research gaps, and explores the extent of cultural adaptations made to these interventions, providing an overview of the literature and highlighting future research and practice avenues.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adopting the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2024. Primary research studies conducted in Asia that employed LI-CBT interventions according to a formal framework for classifying these programs were included. Data were charted and analyzed to identify key themes in various study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and cultural adaptations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 studies from 12 Asian countries were identified, with Japan and China contributing the most research. Most studies reported positive outcomes; research gaps remain due to the heterogeneity of implementation, small sample sizes, inadequate controls, short follow-up periods, and inconsistent cultural adaptations beyond language translation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LI-CBT holds promise for improving mental health accessibility in Asia. However, further research is needed to enhance cultural adaptation considerations and create standardized intervention frameworks that can be modified for use in diverse populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266656032500091X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266656032500091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在全球范围内,精神卫生状况正在增加,但获得精神卫生服务的机会仍然有限,特别是在亚洲。低强度认知行为疗法(LI-CBT)干预提供了一种可扩展的、具有成本效益的方法来解决轻度到中度的心理健康问题。然而,LI-CBT在亚洲的实施情况仍不明朗。本综述考察了亚洲LI-CBT的现有研究,确定了研究差距,并探讨了对这些干预措施的文化适应程度,概述了文献并强调了未来的研究和实践途径。方法采用PRISMA-ScR指南,系统检索PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science和Scopus,重点检索2005 - 2024年间发表的同行评议研究。根据对这些项目进行分类的正式框架,包括在亚洲进行的采用LI-CBT干预措施的初步研究。将数据绘制成图表并进行分析,以确定各种研究特征、干预类型、结果和文化适应中的关键主题。结果共收录了来自12个亚洲国家的42项研究,其中日本和中国贡献最多。大多数研究报告了积极的结果;由于实施的异质性、样本量小、控制不充分、随访时间短以及语言翻译以外的文化适应不一致,研究差距仍然存在。结论li - cbt有望改善亚洲地区的心理健康可及性。然而,需要进一步的研究来加强文化适应考虑和创建标准化的干预框架,这些框架可以修改以适用于不同的人群。
A scoping review of low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy studies across Asia
Introduction
Mental health conditions are increasing globally, yet access to mental health services remains limited, particularly in Asia. Low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (LI-CBT) interventions offer a scalable, cost-effective approach to addressing mild-to-moderate mental health issues. However, the implementation of LI-CBT in Asia remains unclear. This scoping review examines existing research on LI-CBT in Asia, identifies research gaps, and explores the extent of cultural adaptations made to these interventions, providing an overview of the literature and highlighting future research and practice avenues.
Methods
Adopting the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2024. Primary research studies conducted in Asia that employed LI-CBT interventions according to a formal framework for classifying these programs were included. Data were charted and analyzed to identify key themes in various study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and cultural adaptations.
Results
A total of 42 studies from 12 Asian countries were identified, with Japan and China contributing the most research. Most studies reported positive outcomes; research gaps remain due to the heterogeneity of implementation, small sample sizes, inadequate controls, short follow-up periods, and inconsistent cultural adaptations beyond language translation.
Conclusion
LI-CBT holds promise for improving mental health accessibility in Asia. However, further research is needed to enhance cultural adaptation considerations and create standardized intervention frameworks that can be modified for use in diverse populations.