肌浸润性膀胱癌的三段式治疗与根治性膀胱切除术:信息审查被忽视的影响。系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Daniele Robesti , Filippo Micheli , Shesh N. Rai , Giuseppe Fallara , Andrea Gallina , Francesco Montorsi , Alberto Briganti , Nicola Fossati , Antoine G. van der Heijden , Guillaume Ploussard , Bernard Malavaud , Alberto Martini
{"title":"肌浸润性膀胱癌的三段式治疗与根治性膀胱切除术:信息审查被忽视的影响。系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Daniele Robesti ,&nbsp;Filippo Micheli ,&nbsp;Shesh N. Rai ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fallara ,&nbsp;Andrea Gallina ,&nbsp;Francesco Montorsi ,&nbsp;Alberto Briganti ,&nbsp;Nicola Fossati ,&nbsp;Antoine G. van der Heijden ,&nbsp;Guillaume Ploussard ,&nbsp;Bernard Malavaud ,&nbsp;Alberto Martini","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Informative censoring (IC) is a statistical bias that occurs when there is an imbalance in the dropout rate among study arms and this imbalance is not random, but can be ascribed to information that is not accounted for. Studies on trimodal therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) yielded conflicting results. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential impact of informative censoring in influencing study outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search identified studies involving patients with cT2–4 any N, M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with TMT versus RC to assess the risk of informative censoring in assessing oncological measures. We reconstructed published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain time-to-event data and applied the inverse Kaplan-Meier method alongside the log-rank test to evaluate the presence of informative censoring. Finally, we performed a simulation analysis to assess the minimum proportion of events required among censored patients to compensate for the potential effect of IC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 6 studies with 8594 patients were included; 4 used propensity score matching, while 2 did not. An imbalance in censoring was present in 10 of 12 reported outcomes, with bias favoring RC in 5 instances and TMT in 5 instances. Overall, censoring favored RC in overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival (Log-rank: all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). These findings were consistent after stratifying for propensity score matching and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For OS, the minimum proportion of events required compensate for the potential effect of IC ranged from 16 % to 33 %. After adjusting for potential presence of IC, RC was still superior in terms of OS relative to TMT (5-year OS: 42 % vs. 30 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most retrospective studies comparing TMT to RC are at high risk of informative censoring. IC tends to favor radical cystectomy. After correcting for IC, the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing RC were still superior to the ones who undergo TMT. Our data underline the complexity of comparing oncological outcomes between TMT and RC, and challenge the acceptance of TMT based on retrospective comparison in spite of randomization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 104815"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trimodal treatment vs radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The neglected impact of informative censoring. A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Robesti ,&nbsp;Filippo Micheli ,&nbsp;Shesh N. Rai ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fallara ,&nbsp;Andrea Gallina ,&nbsp;Francesco Montorsi ,&nbsp;Alberto Briganti ,&nbsp;Nicola Fossati ,&nbsp;Antoine G. van der Heijden ,&nbsp;Guillaume Ploussard ,&nbsp;Bernard Malavaud ,&nbsp;Alberto Martini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Informative censoring (IC) is a statistical bias that occurs when there is an imbalance in the dropout rate among study arms and this imbalance is not random, but can be ascribed to information that is not accounted for. Studies on trimodal therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) yielded conflicting results. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential impact of informative censoring in influencing study outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search identified studies involving patients with cT2–4 any N, M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with TMT versus RC to assess the risk of informative censoring in assessing oncological measures. We reconstructed published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain time-to-event data and applied the inverse Kaplan-Meier method alongside the log-rank test to evaluate the presence of informative censoring. Finally, we performed a simulation analysis to assess the minimum proportion of events required among censored patients to compensate for the potential effect of IC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 6 studies with 8594 patients were included; 4 used propensity score matching, while 2 did not. An imbalance in censoring was present in 10 of 12 reported outcomes, with bias favoring RC in 5 instances and TMT in 5 instances. Overall, censoring favored RC in overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival (Log-rank: all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). These findings were consistent after stratifying for propensity score matching and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For OS, the minimum proportion of events required compensate for the potential effect of IC ranged from 16 % to 33 %. After adjusting for potential presence of IC, RC was still superior in terms of OS relative to TMT (5-year OS: 42 % vs. 30 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most retrospective studies comparing TMT to RC are at high risk of informative censoring. IC tends to favor radical cystectomy. After correcting for IC, the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing RC were still superior to the ones who undergo TMT. Our data underline the complexity of comparing oncological outcomes between TMT and RC, and challenge the acceptance of TMT based on retrospective comparison in spite of randomization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825002033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825002033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息审查(IC)是一种统计偏差,发生在研究组间的辍学率不平衡时,这种不平衡不是随机的,但可以归因于未考虑的信息。三模式治疗(TMT)与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的研究结果相互矛盾。我们进行了一项荟萃分析来评估信息审查对研究结果的潜在影响。材料和方法一项系统的文献检索确定了cT2-4 任何N, M0肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者接受TMT与RC治疗的研究,以评估评估肿瘤措施时信息审查的风险。我们重建了已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线以获得事件时间数据,并应用逆Kaplan-Meier方法与log-rank检验一起评估信息审查的存在。最后,我们进行了模拟分析,以评估审查患者中补偿ic潜在影响所需的最小事件比例。结果总共纳入6项研究,共8594例患者;4例采用倾向得分匹配,2例不采用倾向得分匹配。在12个报道的结果中,有10个结果存在审查不平衡,其中5例偏向于RC, 5例偏向于TMT。总的来说,在总生存期(OS)、无转移生存期和无病生存期(Log-rank:均p <; 0.01)中,筛选对RC有利。在倾向评分匹配和新辅助化疗分层后,这些发现是一致的。对于OS,补偿IC潜在影响所需的最小事件比例从16% %到33% %不等。在调整了潜在的IC存在后,RC相对于TMT的OS仍然优于TMT(5年OS: 42 % vs 30 %;p & lt; 0.001)。结论大多数比较TMT和RC的回顾性研究都有较高的信息审查风险。IC倾向于根治性膀胱切除术。在校正了IC后,接受RC的患者的肿瘤预后仍然优于接受TMT的患者。我们的数据强调了比较TMT和RC之间肿瘤结果的复杂性,并挑战了基于回顾性比较的TMT的接受性,尽管是随机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trimodal treatment vs radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The neglected impact of informative censoring. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Informative censoring (IC) is a statistical bias that occurs when there is an imbalance in the dropout rate among study arms and this imbalance is not random, but can be ascribed to information that is not accounted for. Studies on trimodal therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) yielded conflicting results. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential impact of informative censoring in influencing study outcomes.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search identified studies involving patients with cT2–4 any N, M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with TMT versus RC to assess the risk of informative censoring in assessing oncological measures. We reconstructed published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain time-to-event data and applied the inverse Kaplan-Meier method alongside the log-rank test to evaluate the presence of informative censoring. Finally, we performed a simulation analysis to assess the minimum proportion of events required among censored patients to compensate for the potential effect of IC.

Results

Overall, 6 studies with 8594 patients were included; 4 used propensity score matching, while 2 did not. An imbalance in censoring was present in 10 of 12 reported outcomes, with bias favoring RC in 5 instances and TMT in 5 instances. Overall, censoring favored RC in overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival (Log-rank: all p < 0.01). These findings were consistent after stratifying for propensity score matching and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For OS, the minimum proportion of events required compensate for the potential effect of IC ranged from 16 % to 33 %. After adjusting for potential presence of IC, RC was still superior in terms of OS relative to TMT (5-year OS: 42 % vs. 30 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Most retrospective studies comparing TMT to RC are at high risk of informative censoring. IC tends to favor radical cystectomy. After correcting for IC, the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing RC were still superior to the ones who undergo TMT. Our data underline the complexity of comparing oncological outcomes between TMT and RC, and challenge the acceptance of TMT based on retrospective comparison in spite of randomization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信