AHEAD评分预测急性和慢性冠脉综合征患者全因死亡的有效性

IF 2.1 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shunsuke Tamaki , Akinori Higaki , Hiroshi Kawakami , Kazuhisa Nishimura , Katsuji Inoue , Shuntaro Ikeda , Osamu Yamaguchi , Naoyuki Akashi , Tetsuya Matoba , Takahide Kohro , Tomoyuki Kabutoya , Kazuomi Kario , Arihiro Kiyosue , Masaharu Nakayama , Yoshihiro Miyamoto , Kenichi Tsujita , Hideo Fujita , Ryozo Nagai
{"title":"AHEAD评分预测急性和慢性冠脉综合征患者全因死亡的有效性","authors":"Shunsuke Tamaki ,&nbsp;Akinori Higaki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kawakami ,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Nishimura ,&nbsp;Katsuji Inoue ,&nbsp;Shuntaro Ikeda ,&nbsp;Osamu Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Naoyuki Akashi ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Matoba ,&nbsp;Takahide Kohro ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kabutoya ,&nbsp;Kazuomi Kario ,&nbsp;Arihiro Kiyosue ,&nbsp;Masaharu Nakayama ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Miyamoto ,&nbsp;Kenichi Tsujita ,&nbsp;Hideo Fujita ,&nbsp;Ryozo Nagai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age &gt;70 years, elevated creatinine levels (&gt;130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS<sub>2</sub> scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.70–2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54–1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06–1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08–1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 200457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes\",\"authors\":\"Shunsuke Tamaki ,&nbsp;Akinori Higaki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kawakami ,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Nishimura ,&nbsp;Katsuji Inoue ,&nbsp;Shuntaro Ikeda ,&nbsp;Osamu Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Naoyuki Akashi ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Matoba ,&nbsp;Takahide Kohro ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kabutoya ,&nbsp;Kazuomi Kario ,&nbsp;Arihiro Kiyosue ,&nbsp;Masaharu Nakayama ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Miyamoto ,&nbsp;Kenichi Tsujita ,&nbsp;Hideo Fujita ,&nbsp;Ryozo Nagai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age &gt;70 years, elevated creatinine levels (&gt;130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS<sub>2</sub> scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.70–2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54–1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06–1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08–1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525000959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525000959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心房颤动;H:血红蛋白;艾凡:老年人;A:肾脏参数异常;D:糖尿病)评分用于预测心力衰竭患者的全因死亡(ACD)。然而,与冠心病(CAD)患者的CHADS2评分相比,其对ACD的预测价值尚不清楚。方法本回顾性多中心队列研究使用临床深度数据积累系统(CLIDAS)数据库分析急性(ACS)或慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的数据。心房颤动、贫血、年龄≥70岁、肌酐水平升高(≥130 μmol/L)、糖尿病各1分,计算AHEAD评分。结果2013年4月至2019年3月共入组9033例患者。Cox多因素分析显示,ACS和CCS患者的AHEAD和CHADS2评分均与ACD独立相关(ACS的风险比为1.91 [95% CI, 1.70-2.14], CCS的风险比为1.72 [1.54-1.92],ACS的风险比为1.17 [1.06-1.29],CCS的风险比为1.18[1.08-1.29])。然而,受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,在ACS和CCS中,AHEAD评分对ACD的预测价值明显高于CHADS2评分。以AHEAD评分分层的两组患者的ACD发生率有显著差异。结论:与CHADS2评分相比,AHEAD评分对冠心病患者的ACD具有更强的预测价值,无论他们是否患有ACS或CCS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes

Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes

Background

The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS2 score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age >70 years, elevated creatinine levels (>130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus.

Results

In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS2 scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.70–2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54–1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06–1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08–1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS2 score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups.

Conclusions

The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS2 score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信