Abudusaimaiti Maierdiyali , Yun Wang , Jiding Chen , Runsheng Li , Mei Luo , Xueyang Li , Yangang Yang , Shuangcheng Tao , Yaping Kong , Hao Wang , Zhi Lu
{"title":"青藏铁路沿线野生动物过境设施评价","authors":"Abudusaimaiti Maierdiyali , Yun Wang , Jiding Chen , Runsheng Li , Mei Luo , Xueyang Li , Yangang Yang , Shuangcheng Tao , Yaping Kong , Hao Wang , Zhi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous Qinghai-Tibet railway studies have lacked a comprehensive understanding of wildlife crossing structures (WCSs) distribution and suitability for local wildlife, focusing instead on individual underpass usage. We addressed this gap by modeling the habitat distribution of 11 nationally protected mammal species along the railway using maximum entropy modeling and distribution data, and we found that WCSs density met standards for all species except Tibetan gazelles (<em>Procapra picticaudata</em>), whose average WCSs distance was 1.65 km. After evaluating 23 underpasses with line transects and infrared cameras, we found that all underpasses were used by wildlife, with nine protected mammals recorded, while Tibetan antelopes (<em>Pantholops hodgsonii</em>) used exclusively larger underpasses during migration. Smaller underpasses located further from highways were more effectively used. This first assessment of WCSs distribution and density along the railway, comparing large and small WCSs, recommends prioritizing larger WCSs construction tailored to Tibetan antelope migration needs in future designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104866"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment for the wildlife crossing structures along the Qinghai-Tibet railway\",\"authors\":\"Abudusaimaiti Maierdiyali , Yun Wang , Jiding Chen , Runsheng Li , Mei Luo , Xueyang Li , Yangang Yang , Shuangcheng Tao , Yaping Kong , Hao Wang , Zhi Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous Qinghai-Tibet railway studies have lacked a comprehensive understanding of wildlife crossing structures (WCSs) distribution and suitability for local wildlife, focusing instead on individual underpass usage. We addressed this gap by modeling the habitat distribution of 11 nationally protected mammal species along the railway using maximum entropy modeling and distribution data, and we found that WCSs density met standards for all species except Tibetan gazelles (<em>Procapra picticaudata</em>), whose average WCSs distance was 1.65 km. After evaluating 23 underpasses with line transects and infrared cameras, we found that all underpasses were used by wildlife, with nine protected mammals recorded, while Tibetan antelopes (<em>Pantholops hodgsonii</em>) used exclusively larger underpasses during migration. Smaller underpasses located further from highways were more effectively used. This first assessment of WCSs distribution and density along the railway, comparing large and small WCSs, recommends prioritizing larger WCSs construction tailored to Tibetan antelope migration needs in future designs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002767\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment for the wildlife crossing structures along the Qinghai-Tibet railway
Previous Qinghai-Tibet railway studies have lacked a comprehensive understanding of wildlife crossing structures (WCSs) distribution and suitability for local wildlife, focusing instead on individual underpass usage. We addressed this gap by modeling the habitat distribution of 11 nationally protected mammal species along the railway using maximum entropy modeling and distribution data, and we found that WCSs density met standards for all species except Tibetan gazelles (Procapra picticaudata), whose average WCSs distance was 1.65 km. After evaluating 23 underpasses with line transects and infrared cameras, we found that all underpasses were used by wildlife, with nine protected mammals recorded, while Tibetan antelopes (Pantholops hodgsonii) used exclusively larger underpasses during migration. Smaller underpasses located further from highways were more effectively used. This first assessment of WCSs distribution and density along the railway, comparing large and small WCSs, recommends prioritizing larger WCSs construction tailored to Tibetan antelope migration needs in future designs.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.