高超声速复杂几何流的浸入边界公式:在大气再入中的应用

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Iko Midani , Valentin Ledermann , Eddy Constant , Martin Spel , Laurent Stainier , Pierre Boivin , Julien Favier
{"title":"高超声速复杂几何流的浸入边界公式:在大气再入中的应用","authors":"Iko Midani ,&nbsp;Valentin Ledermann ,&nbsp;Eddy Constant ,&nbsp;Martin Spel ,&nbsp;Laurent Stainier ,&nbsp;Pierre Boivin ,&nbsp;Julien Favier","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article discusses the challenges of modeling atmospheric reentry using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) due to its complexity and practical industrial applications. Ablation phenomena caused by high energy make it difficult and time-consuming to use a “high-fidelity” CFD method to accurately measure forces and heat flux. As a result, methods based on Newton’s theory are used to model aerodynamic forces, incorporating statistical correlations from CFD results to estimate heat fluxes. However, these methods sacrifice accuracy for CPU and engineering time and have difficulty representing realistic physics when complex phenomena occur, such as shock interactions. To bridge the gap between approximate and high-fidelity methods, we propose a new approach using an automatic grid generation method of the octree Cartesian type coupled to a solver solving Euler’s equations. To apply the boundary condition accurately we compared two immersed boundary methods: a diffuse interface method and a sharp interface method under hypersonic flow configurations. We present a comparative study of these two formulations on verification and validation phases, including an academic test case and an industrial case on a real reentry spacecraft. The novelty lies in applying these methods to complex cases involving strong discontinuities (attached shocks). After concluding this comparative study, we demonstrate that with adapted formulations and an optimized approach, IB methods can handle complex geometries typical of atmospheric reentry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"299 ","pages":"Article 106715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immersed boundary formulation for complex geometries in hypersonic flows: Application to atmospheric reentry\",\"authors\":\"Iko Midani ,&nbsp;Valentin Ledermann ,&nbsp;Eddy Constant ,&nbsp;Martin Spel ,&nbsp;Laurent Stainier ,&nbsp;Pierre Boivin ,&nbsp;Julien Favier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article discusses the challenges of modeling atmospheric reentry using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) due to its complexity and practical industrial applications. Ablation phenomena caused by high energy make it difficult and time-consuming to use a “high-fidelity” CFD method to accurately measure forces and heat flux. As a result, methods based on Newton’s theory are used to model aerodynamic forces, incorporating statistical correlations from CFD results to estimate heat fluxes. However, these methods sacrifice accuracy for CPU and engineering time and have difficulty representing realistic physics when complex phenomena occur, such as shock interactions. To bridge the gap between approximate and high-fidelity methods, we propose a new approach using an automatic grid generation method of the octree Cartesian type coupled to a solver solving Euler’s equations. To apply the boundary condition accurately we compared two immersed boundary methods: a diffuse interface method and a sharp interface method under hypersonic flow configurations. We present a comparative study of these two formulations on verification and validation phases, including an academic test case and an industrial case on a real reentry spacecraft. The novelty lies in applying these methods to complex cases involving strong discontinuities (attached shocks). After concluding this comparative study, we demonstrate that with adapted formulations and an optimized approach, IB methods can handle complex geometries typical of atmospheric reentry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"volume\":\"299 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025001756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025001756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于计算流体动力学(CFD)的复杂性和实际工业应用,本文讨论了利用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟大气层再入所面临的挑战。高能引起的烧蚀现象使得利用“高保真”CFD方法精确测量力和热流变得困难且耗时。因此,基于牛顿理论的方法被用于模拟空气动力,并结合CFD结果的统计相关性来估计热通量。然而,这些方法牺牲了CPU和工程时间的准确性,并且在发生复杂现象(如冲击相互作用)时难以表示真实的物理。为了弥合近似和高保真方法之间的差距,我们提出了一种新的方法,使用八叉树笛卡尔型的自动网格生成方法与求解欧拉方程的求解器耦合。为了准确地应用边界条件,我们比较了两种浸入边界方法:扩散界面法和锐界面法。我们在验证和验证阶段对这两种公式进行了比较研究,包括一个学术测试案例和一个实际再入航天器的工业案例。新颖之处在于将这些方法应用于涉及强不连续(附加冲击)的复杂情况。在完成这一比较研究之后,我们证明,通过调整公式和优化方法,IB方法可以处理大气再入的典型复杂几何形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immersed boundary formulation for complex geometries in hypersonic flows: Application to atmospheric reentry
This article discusses the challenges of modeling atmospheric reentry using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) due to its complexity and practical industrial applications. Ablation phenomena caused by high energy make it difficult and time-consuming to use a “high-fidelity” CFD method to accurately measure forces and heat flux. As a result, methods based on Newton’s theory are used to model aerodynamic forces, incorporating statistical correlations from CFD results to estimate heat fluxes. However, these methods sacrifice accuracy for CPU and engineering time and have difficulty representing realistic physics when complex phenomena occur, such as shock interactions. To bridge the gap between approximate and high-fidelity methods, we propose a new approach using an automatic grid generation method of the octree Cartesian type coupled to a solver solving Euler’s equations. To apply the boundary condition accurately we compared two immersed boundary methods: a diffuse interface method and a sharp interface method under hypersonic flow configurations. We present a comparative study of these two formulations on verification and validation phases, including an academic test case and an industrial case on a real reentry spacecraft. The novelty lies in applying these methods to complex cases involving strong discontinuities (attached shocks). After concluding this comparative study, we demonstrate that with adapted formulations and an optimized approach, IB methods can handle complex geometries typical of atmospheric reentry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信