粘连眼粘手术装置与软壳技术前房稳定性的比较分析。

Daniel M Handzel, Chiraz Ben Abdallah, Markus S Ladewig, Walter Sekundo
{"title":"粘连眼粘手术装置与软壳技术前房稳定性的比较分析。","authors":"Daniel M Handzel, Chiraz Ben Abdallah, Markus S Ladewig, Walter Sekundo","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06867-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the properties of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVD) in respect of their ability to create and maintain high intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized interventional study IOP was measured using rebound tonometry with sterilized probes immediately before the beginning of the CCC and immediately afterwards during cataract surgery. The study included 177 eyes in four groups using two different OVD - hyaluronic acid (HA) and a combination of HA and hydroxy propylmethylcellulosis (HPMC) according to the soft shell-technique (SST) - and two different instruments, Utrata forceps (UF) and 26 g cystotome (RN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) during capsulorhexis was measured at 57.0 ± 12.2 mmHg in eyes treated with HA (90) and 63.1 ± 13.4 mmHg in eyes treated with SS (87). The difference in IOP reduction between HA and SS did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.060).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of different OVD did not result in a significant difference in IOP drop. As the soft shell-technique has shown superiority in respect of endothelial protection, these results should encourage cataract surgeon to resort to the soft shell-technique more often if not use it as a standard technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of anterior chamber stability with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device versus the soft-shell technique.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M Handzel, Chiraz Ben Abdallah, Markus S Ladewig, Walter Sekundo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-025-06867-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the properties of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVD) in respect of their ability to create and maintain high intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized interventional study IOP was measured using rebound tonometry with sterilized probes immediately before the beginning of the CCC and immediately afterwards during cataract surgery. The study included 177 eyes in four groups using two different OVD - hyaluronic acid (HA) and a combination of HA and hydroxy propylmethylcellulosis (HPMC) according to the soft shell-technique (SST) - and two different instruments, Utrata forceps (UF) and 26 g cystotome (RN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) during capsulorhexis was measured at 57.0 ± 12.2 mmHg in eyes treated with HA (90) and 63.1 ± 13.4 mmHg in eyes treated with SS (87). The difference in IOP reduction between HA and SS did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.060).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of different OVD did not result in a significant difference in IOP drop. As the soft shell-technique has shown superiority in respect of endothelial protection, these results should encourage cataract surgeon to resort to the soft shell-technique more often if not use it as a standard technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06867-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06867-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究不同眼粘手术装置(OVD)在形成连续曲线撕囊(CCC)过程中产生和维持高眼压(IOP)的能力。方法:在这项随机介入研究中,在白内障手术开始前和手术后立即使用消毒探头测眼压。该研究包括177只眼睛,分为四组,使用两种不同的OVD -透明质酸(HA)和HA与羟基丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)的组合,根据软壳技术(SST)和两种不同的工具,Utrata钳(UF)和26g膀胱切片(RN)。结果:撕囊过程中,HA组眼压下降57.0±12.2 mmHg (90), SS组眼压下降63.1±13.4 mmHg(87)。HA与SS的IOP降低差异无统计学意义(p = 0.060)。结论:不同OVD的使用对IOP下降无显著性影响。由于软壳技术在内皮保护方面显示出优越性,这些结果应该鼓励白内障外科医生在不将其作为标准技术的情况下更多地采用软壳技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of anterior chamber stability with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device versus the soft-shell technique.

Purpose: To study the properties of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVD) in respect of their ability to create and maintain high intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC).

Methods: In this randomized interventional study IOP was measured using rebound tonometry with sterilized probes immediately before the beginning of the CCC and immediately afterwards during cataract surgery. The study included 177 eyes in four groups using two different OVD - hyaluronic acid (HA) and a combination of HA and hydroxy propylmethylcellulosis (HPMC) according to the soft shell-technique (SST) - and two different instruments, Utrata forceps (UF) and 26 g cystotome (RN).

Results: The drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) during capsulorhexis was measured at 57.0 ± 12.2 mmHg in eyes treated with HA (90) and 63.1 ± 13.4 mmHg in eyes treated with SS (87). The difference in IOP reduction between HA and SS did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.060).

Conclusions: The use of different OVD did not result in a significant difference in IOP drop. As the soft shell-technique has shown superiority in respect of endothelial protection, these results should encourage cataract surgeon to resort to the soft shell-technique more often if not use it as a standard technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信