儿科筛查优先评估吞咽困难:一种筛查婴儿和儿童吞咽障碍的新工具的验证。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Antonella Cerchiari, Giorgia Biondo, Fausto Maria Fassari, Francesca Pizza, Carolina Giordani, Martina Falbo, Gessica Della Bella, Massimiliano Raponi, Marco Tofani
{"title":"儿科筛查优先评估吞咽困难:一种筛查婴儿和儿童吞咽障碍的新工具的验证。","authors":"Antonella Cerchiari, Giorgia Biondo, Fausto Maria Fassari, Francesca Pizza, Carolina Giordani, Martina Falbo, Gessica Della Bella, Massimiliano Raponi, Marco Tofani","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the psychometric properties of the Pediatric Screening-Priority Evaluation Dysphagia (PS-PED), a novel 14-item, non-invasive tool for identifying dysphagia risk in infants and children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Internal consistency and interrater reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating PS-PED scores with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). Analysis of variance examined score differences across neurological and neuromuscular conditions, congenital and musculoskeletal abnormalities, cardiovascular disease, and genetic syndromes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cut-offs for optimal sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PS-PED was administered to 117 children (59 males and 58 females; mean age 6 years 8 months, SD 4 years 4 months), showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.716) and strong interrater reliability (ICC = 1). A positive correlation (0.765) was found with the PAS, with significant score differences among diagnostic groups. ROC analysis established cut-offs for two dysphagia risk levels.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The PS-PED is a reliable, valid screening tool for dysphagia, facilitating early identification in infants and children across various medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pediatric Screening-Priority Evaluation Dysphagia: Validation of a new tool for screening swallowing disorders in infants and children.\",\"authors\":\"Antonella Cerchiari, Giorgia Biondo, Fausto Maria Fassari, Francesca Pizza, Carolina Giordani, Martina Falbo, Gessica Della Bella, Massimiliano Raponi, Marco Tofani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmcn.16390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the psychometric properties of the Pediatric Screening-Priority Evaluation Dysphagia (PS-PED), a novel 14-item, non-invasive tool for identifying dysphagia risk in infants and children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Internal consistency and interrater reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating PS-PED scores with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). Analysis of variance examined score differences across neurological and neuromuscular conditions, congenital and musculoskeletal abnormalities, cardiovascular disease, and genetic syndromes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cut-offs for optimal sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PS-PED was administered to 117 children (59 males and 58 females; mean age 6 years 8 months, SD 4 years 4 months), showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.716) and strong interrater reliability (ICC = 1). A positive correlation (0.765) was found with the PAS, with significant score differences among diagnostic groups. ROC analysis established cut-offs for two dysphagia risk levels.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The PS-PED is a reliable, valid screening tool for dysphagia, facilitating early identification in infants and children across various medical conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16390\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估儿童吞咽困难筛查优先评估(PS-PED)的心理测量特性,PS-PED是一种新型的14项无创工具,用于识别婴儿和儿童的吞咽困难风险。方法:采用Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数(ICC)评价内部一致性和组间信度。通过将PS-PED得分与穿透性期望量表(PAS)相关联来评估并发效度。方差分析检查了神经和神经肌肉状况、先天性和肌肉骨骼异常、心血管疾病和遗传综合征之间的得分差异。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定最佳灵敏度和特异性的截止值。结果:117例儿童接受PS-PED治疗,其中男59例,女58例;平均年龄6岁8个月,标准差4岁4个月),具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.716)和较强的间信度(ICC = 1)。与PAS呈正相关(0.765),诊断组间评分差异显著。ROC分析确定了两个吞咽困难风险水平的临界值。PS-PED是一种可靠、有效的吞咽困难筛查工具,有助于婴儿和儿童在各种医疗条件下的早期识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pediatric Screening-Priority Evaluation Dysphagia: Validation of a new tool for screening swallowing disorders in infants and children.

Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Pediatric Screening-Priority Evaluation Dysphagia (PS-PED), a novel 14-item, non-invasive tool for identifying dysphagia risk in infants and children.

Method: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating PS-PED scores with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). Analysis of variance examined score differences across neurological and neuromuscular conditions, congenital and musculoskeletal abnormalities, cardiovascular disease, and genetic syndromes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cut-offs for optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The PS-PED was administered to 117 children (59 males and 58 females; mean age 6 years 8 months, SD 4 years 4 months), showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.716) and strong interrater reliability (ICC = 1). A positive correlation (0.765) was found with the PAS, with significant score differences among diagnostic groups. ROC analysis established cut-offs for two dysphagia risk levels.

Interpretation: The PS-PED is a reliable, valid screening tool for dysphagia, facilitating early identification in infants and children across various medical conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信