{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂与胺碘酮联合治疗心房颤动:荟萃分析。","authors":"Kazuhiko Kido, Mikiko Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Masayuki Hashiguchi","doi":"10.1177/10742484251351148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly increases the concentrations of DOACs and may increase the bleeding risks. Multiple real-world studies compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus the DOAC alone, but their main findings were contradictory.MethodsA meta-analysis compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus DOACs monotherapy. Database searches through May 1, 2025, were performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, any bleeding, all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.ResultsThis meta-analysis included a total of nine studies. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOAC and DOAC monotherapy groups (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98, 1.27; <i>P</i> = .09; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 64%). No significant differences in any bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.88, 1.57; <i>P</i> = .27; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 77%), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84, 1.11; <i>P</i> = .65; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 56%), and intracranial bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32%) were also found between the two groups. No significant differences in stroke or systemic embolism were found between the two groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 34%).Conclusion and RelevanceThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs did not significantly increase the bleeding risks or decrease the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to the DOAC monotherapy. The drug-drug interactions between amiodarone and DOACs may not be clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"30 ","pages":"10742484251351148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concomitant Therapy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiko Kido, Mikiko Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Masayuki Hashiguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484251351148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly increases the concentrations of DOACs and may increase the bleeding risks. Multiple real-world studies compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus the DOAC alone, but their main findings were contradictory.MethodsA meta-analysis compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus DOACs monotherapy. Database searches through May 1, 2025, were performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, any bleeding, all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.ResultsThis meta-analysis included a total of nine studies. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOAC and DOAC monotherapy groups (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98, 1.27; <i>P</i> = .09; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 64%). No significant differences in any bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.88, 1.57; <i>P</i> = .27; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 77%), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84, 1.11; <i>P</i> = .65; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 56%), and intracranial bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32%) were also found between the two groups. No significant differences in stroke or systemic embolism were found between the two groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 34%).Conclusion and RelevanceThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs did not significantly increase the bleeding risks or decrease the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to the DOAC monotherapy. The drug-drug interactions between amiodarone and DOACs may not be clinically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"10742484251351148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484251351148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484251351148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景胺碘酮与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)合用可显著增加DOACs浓度,并可能增加出血风险。多个现实世界的研究比较了胺碘酮和DOAC的联合治疗与DOAC的单独治疗,但他们的主要发现是矛盾的。方法荟萃分析比较胺碘酮与DOACs联合治疗与DOACs单药治疗的疗效。数据库搜索执行到2025年5月1日。主要结局是大出血。次要结局包括中风或全身性栓塞、任何出血、全因死亡率、胃肠道出血和颅内出血。结果本荟萃分析共纳入9项研究。胺碘酮与DOAC联合治疗组与DOAC单药治疗组大出血发生率差异无统计学意义(OR 1.12;95% ci 0.98, 1.27;p = .09;i2 = 64%)。出血差异无统计学意义(OR 1.18;95% ci 0.88, 1.57;p = .27;I2 = 77%),胃肠道出血(OR 0.97;95% ci 0.84, 1.11;p = .65;I2 = 56%),颅内出血(OR 1.14;95% ci 1.00, 1.30;p = 0.05;I2 = 32%)。两组在卒中或全身性栓塞方面无显著差异(or 0.86;95% ci 0.74, 1.00;p = 0.05;i2 = 34%)。结论及相关性与DOAC单药治疗相比,胺碘酮与DOAC联合治疗未显著增加出血风险,也未显著降低卒中或全身栓塞的风险。胺碘酮与DOACs之间的药物相互作用可能没有临床意义。
The Concomitant Therapy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.
BackgroundThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly increases the concentrations of DOACs and may increase the bleeding risks. Multiple real-world studies compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus the DOAC alone, but their main findings were contradictory.MethodsA meta-analysis compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus DOACs monotherapy. Database searches through May 1, 2025, were performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, any bleeding, all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.ResultsThis meta-analysis included a total of nine studies. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOAC and DOAC monotherapy groups (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98, 1.27; P = .09; I2 = 64%). No significant differences in any bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.88, 1.57; P = .27; I2 = 77%), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84, 1.11; P = .65; I2 = 56%), and intracranial bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; P = .05; I2 = 32%) were also found between the two groups. No significant differences in stroke or systemic embolism were found between the two groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00; P = .05; I2 = 34%).Conclusion and RelevanceThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs did not significantly increase the bleeding risks or decrease the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to the DOAC monotherapy. The drug-drug interactions between amiodarone and DOACs may not be clinically significant.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).