Michael W Hubble, Stephen Taylor, Melisa Martin, Sara Houston, Ginny R Kaplan, Randy D Kearns
{"title":"院外心脏骤停时,骨内途径与肾上腺素- rosc间期延长有关。","authors":"Michael W Hubble, Stephen Taylor, Melisa Martin, Sara Houston, Ginny R Kaplan, Randy D Kearns","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged resuscitation is associated with poor patient outcomes. While the importance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation is well-known, the role of other components affecting resuscitation duration is less well-established. We postulated that first-dose intraosseous (IO) epinephrine would prolong the pressor-to-ROSC interval compared to intravenous (IV) drug administration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the relationship between first epinephrine administration route and pressor-to-ROSC intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative Annual Research dataset was conducted among adults who experienced non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed arrests. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influence of first epinephrine route on the pressor-to-ROSC interval. End-of-event was defined as ROSC, field termination of resuscitation, or hospital arrival without ROSC, with right censoring of the latter group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 9351 patients were included for analysis, of which 63.9% were males. The mean age of participants was 65.3(± 15.5) years and presumed cardiac etiology was present in 82.7% of arrests. An initial shockable rhythm was present in 27.1%, while 29.7% received bystander CPR and 39.7% attained ROSC. The mean pressor-to-ROSC interval was 13.21(± 9.65), 14.86 (± 10.89), and 14.42 (± 10.52) minutes for the intravenous, tibial IO, and humeral IO routes, respectively (p < 0.001). First epinephrine administration via the tibial or humeral IO route was associated with a decreased hazard of ROSC compared to the IV route (HR = 0.78, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.86, p = 0.01 per minute, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the tibial and humeral IO routes of first epinephrine administration were associated with marginally prolonged resuscitation duration after drug administration and decreasing hazard of ROSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraosseous route is associated with prolonged epinephrine-to-ROSC interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Michael W Hubble, Stephen Taylor, Melisa Martin, Sara Houston, Ginny R Kaplan, Randy D Kearns\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged resuscitation is associated with poor patient outcomes. While the importance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation is well-known, the role of other components affecting resuscitation duration is less well-established. We postulated that first-dose intraosseous (IO) epinephrine would prolong the pressor-to-ROSC interval compared to intravenous (IV) drug administration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the relationship between first epinephrine administration route and pressor-to-ROSC intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative Annual Research dataset was conducted among adults who experienced non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed arrests. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influence of first epinephrine route on the pressor-to-ROSC interval. End-of-event was defined as ROSC, field termination of resuscitation, or hospital arrival without ROSC, with right censoring of the latter group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 9351 patients were included for analysis, of which 63.9% were males. The mean age of participants was 65.3(± 15.5) years and presumed cardiac etiology was present in 82.7% of arrests. An initial shockable rhythm was present in 27.1%, while 29.7% received bystander CPR and 39.7% attained ROSC. The mean pressor-to-ROSC interval was 13.21(± 9.65), 14.86 (± 10.89), and 14.42 (± 10.52) minutes for the intravenous, tibial IO, and humeral IO routes, respectively (p < 0.001). First epinephrine administration via the tibial or humeral IO route was associated with a decreased hazard of ROSC compared to the IV route (HR = 0.78, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.86, p = 0.01 per minute, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the tibial and humeral IO routes of first epinephrine administration were associated with marginally prolonged resuscitation duration after drug administration and decreasing hazard of ROSC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraosseous route is associated with prolonged epinephrine-to-ROSC interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Background: Prolonged resuscitation is associated with poor patient outcomes. While the importance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation is well-known, the role of other components affecting resuscitation duration is less well-established. We postulated that first-dose intraosseous (IO) epinephrine would prolong the pressor-to-ROSC interval compared to intravenous (IV) drug administration.
Aims: To describe the relationship between first epinephrine administration route and pressor-to-ROSC intervals.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative Annual Research dataset was conducted among adults who experienced non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed arrests. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influence of first epinephrine route on the pressor-to-ROSC interval. End-of-event was defined as ROSC, field termination of resuscitation, or hospital arrival without ROSC, with right censoring of the latter group.
Results: Overall, 9351 patients were included for analysis, of which 63.9% were males. The mean age of participants was 65.3(± 15.5) years and presumed cardiac etiology was present in 82.7% of arrests. An initial shockable rhythm was present in 27.1%, while 29.7% received bystander CPR and 39.7% attained ROSC. The mean pressor-to-ROSC interval was 13.21(± 9.65), 14.86 (± 10.89), and 14.42 (± 10.52) minutes for the intravenous, tibial IO, and humeral IO routes, respectively (p < 0.001). First epinephrine administration via the tibial or humeral IO route was associated with a decreased hazard of ROSC compared to the IV route (HR = 0.78, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.86, p = 0.01 per minute, respectively).
Conclusions: These data suggest that the tibial and humeral IO routes of first epinephrine administration were associated with marginally prolonged resuscitation duration after drug administration and decreasing hazard of ROSC.
期刊介绍:
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.