临床报告新生儿重症监护基因检测效用指数(C-GUIDE NICU):量化全基因组测序在NICU中的效用。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lena I Dolman, Joyce Yan, Stephanie Luca, Bowen Xiao, Salma Shickh, Elise Poole, Lauren Chad, Wendy J Ungar, Martin Offringa, Robin Z Hayeems
{"title":"临床报告新生儿重症监护基因检测效用指数(C-GUIDE NICU):量化全基因组测序在NICU中的效用。","authors":"Lena I Dolman, Joyce Yan, Stephanie Luca, Bowen Xiao, Salma Shickh, Elise Poole, Lauren Chad, Wendy J Ungar, Martin Offringa, Robin Z Hayeems","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Use of genomic sequencing (GS) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has increased with improved diagnostic yield. However, uncertainty persists regarding when and for whom GS is most useful. Since a standardized approach to assessing utility is lacking, we developed a novel version of the Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE<sup>TM</sup>) to quantify the utility of GS in NICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by a scoping review, we developed a draft C-GUIDE NICU tool to quantify utility which underwent iterative revisions through feedback from clinician interviews and questionnaires on item relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. We finalized the expert-informed C-GUIDE NICU using an international Delphi consensus process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scoping review (n=25 articles) and interviews (n=21) revealed key themes of utility. Guided by qualitative feedback and item scoring, C-GUIDE was iteratively reduced to include 21, 18, and 14 items. The Delphi consensus process with 22 experts achieved item consensus and stability, yielding a final 10-item tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a rigorous process, we developed a consensus-based standardized method for capturing the clinical utility of GS in NICUs. C-GUIDE NICU can be used by clinicians, researchers, and payers to assess GS value to patient care, and will be available for licensed use following reliability and validity testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101503"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx for neonatal intensive care (C-GUIDE NICU): Quantifying Genome-wide Sequencing Utility in the NICU.\",\"authors\":\"Lena I Dolman, Joyce Yan, Stephanie Luca, Bowen Xiao, Salma Shickh, Elise Poole, Lauren Chad, Wendy J Ungar, Martin Offringa, Robin Z Hayeems\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Use of genomic sequencing (GS) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has increased with improved diagnostic yield. However, uncertainty persists regarding when and for whom GS is most useful. Since a standardized approach to assessing utility is lacking, we developed a novel version of the Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE<sup>TM</sup>) to quantify the utility of GS in NICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by a scoping review, we developed a draft C-GUIDE NICU tool to quantify utility which underwent iterative revisions through feedback from clinician interviews and questionnaires on item relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. We finalized the expert-informed C-GUIDE NICU using an international Delphi consensus process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scoping review (n=25 articles) and interviews (n=21) revealed key themes of utility. Guided by qualitative feedback and item scoring, C-GUIDE was iteratively reduced to include 21, 18, and 14 items. The Delphi consensus process with 22 experts achieved item consensus and stability, yielding a final 10-item tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a rigorous process, we developed a consensus-based standardized method for capturing the clinical utility of GS in NICUs. C-GUIDE NICU can be used by clinicians, researchers, and payers to assess GS value to patient care, and will be available for licensed use following reliability and validity testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101503\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基因组测序(GS)在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的使用随着诊断率的提高而增加。然而,GS在何时以及对谁最有用的问题上仍然存在不确定性。由于缺乏评估效用的标准化方法,我们开发了一种新版本的临床报告基因检测效用指数(C-GUIDETM)来量化GS在新生儿重症监护病房中的效用。方法:根据范围综述,我们制定了一份C-GUIDE NICU工具草案,通过临床医生访谈和问卷调查对项目相关性、可理解性和全面性的反馈进行了反复修订。我们使用国际德尔菲共识过程最终确定了专家通知的C-GUIDE新生儿重症监护病房。结果:范围审查(n=25篇文章)和访谈(n=21篇)揭示了效用的关键主题。在定性反馈和项目评分的指导下,C-GUIDE迭代减少到包括21、18和14个项目。由22位专家组成的德尔菲共识过程实现了项目共识和稳定性,产生了最终的10项工具。结论:通过严格的流程,我们开发了一种基于共识的标准化方法来捕获GS在新生儿重症监护病房中的临床应用。C-GUIDE NICU可被临床医生、研究人员和支付方用于评估GS对患者护理的价值,并将在经过信度和效度测试后获得许可使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx for neonatal intensive care (C-GUIDE NICU): Quantifying Genome-wide Sequencing Utility in the NICU.

Purpose: Use of genomic sequencing (GS) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has increased with improved diagnostic yield. However, uncertainty persists regarding when and for whom GS is most useful. Since a standardized approach to assessing utility is lacking, we developed a novel version of the Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDETM) to quantify the utility of GS in NICUs.

Methods: Informed by a scoping review, we developed a draft C-GUIDE NICU tool to quantify utility which underwent iterative revisions through feedback from clinician interviews and questionnaires on item relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. We finalized the expert-informed C-GUIDE NICU using an international Delphi consensus process.

Results: Scoping review (n=25 articles) and interviews (n=21) revealed key themes of utility. Guided by qualitative feedback and item scoring, C-GUIDE was iteratively reduced to include 21, 18, and 14 items. The Delphi consensus process with 22 experts achieved item consensus and stability, yielding a final 10-item tool.

Conclusion: Using a rigorous process, we developed a consensus-based standardized method for capturing the clinical utility of GS in NICUs. C-GUIDE NICU can be used by clinicians, researchers, and payers to assess GS value to patient care, and will be available for licensed use following reliability and validity testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信