{"title":"重新评估标准护理成像以确定膀胱和上尿路尿路上皮癌患者治疗结果的预测因素。","authors":"Shelby Harper, Erick M Remer, Nima Almassi","doi":"10.1007/s11934-025-01278-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Urothelial carcinoma is a prevalent malignancy within the United States that may involve the upper and/or lower urinary tracts. Multimodal treatment is often employed, with transurethral resection and intravesical therapy standard of care for non-muscle-invasive disease; neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive disease; and combination immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates standard of care for metastatic disease. These treatments carry risks of surgical complication or treatment-associated toxicity which can impair quality of life. Predictive biomarkers of treatment tolerability are currently limited.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is emerging evidence that radiological biomarkers can predict treatment outcomes among patients with urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we evaluate the existing data on radiological biomarkers evaluable from current standard-of-care imaging in predicting treatment outcome among patients with urothelial carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":"26 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-appraisal of Standard of Care Imaging to Identify Predictors of Treatment Outcomes among Patients with Bladder and Upper Tract Urothelial Cancers.\",\"authors\":\"Shelby Harper, Erick M Remer, Nima Almassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11934-025-01278-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Urothelial carcinoma is a prevalent malignancy within the United States that may involve the upper and/or lower urinary tracts. Multimodal treatment is often employed, with transurethral resection and intravesical therapy standard of care for non-muscle-invasive disease; neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive disease; and combination immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates standard of care for metastatic disease. These treatments carry risks of surgical complication or treatment-associated toxicity which can impair quality of life. Predictive biomarkers of treatment tolerability are currently limited.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is emerging evidence that radiological biomarkers can predict treatment outcomes among patients with urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we evaluate the existing data on radiological biomarkers evaluable from current standard-of-care imaging in predicting treatment outcome among patients with urothelial carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-025-01278-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-025-01278-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Re-appraisal of Standard of Care Imaging to Identify Predictors of Treatment Outcomes among Patients with Bladder and Upper Tract Urothelial Cancers.
Purpose of review: Urothelial carcinoma is a prevalent malignancy within the United States that may involve the upper and/or lower urinary tracts. Multimodal treatment is often employed, with transurethral resection and intravesical therapy standard of care for non-muscle-invasive disease; neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive disease; and combination immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates standard of care for metastatic disease. These treatments carry risks of surgical complication or treatment-associated toxicity which can impair quality of life. Predictive biomarkers of treatment tolerability are currently limited.
Recent findings: There is emerging evidence that radiological biomarkers can predict treatment outcomes among patients with urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we evaluate the existing data on radiological biomarkers evaluable from current standard-of-care imaging in predicting treatment outcome among patients with urothelial carcinoma.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.