应用温室气体盘存计算方法预测森林碳汇。

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fredric Mosley, Jari Niemi, Sampo Soimakallio
{"title":"应用温室气体盘存计算方法预测森林碳汇。","authors":"Fredric Mosley, Jari Niemi, Sampo Soimakallio","doi":"10.1186/s13021-025-00307-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finland's national Climate Act contains a target for carbon neutrality by 2035. Achieving this target not only depends on the effective implementation of emission reductions, but to a large part on the forest carbon sink. A recent publication of the Government's analysis, assessment, and research activities highlights a potential disparity in forest land greenhouse gas (GHG) balance estimates by the ex-ante scenario model used in the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), and the ex-post GHG inventory methodology used for creating an official record of emissions and removals. Better methodological compatibility is needed to answer a key question: How large will the forest carbon sink be in different scenarios? This study is a first attempt to show the usefulness of applying the GHG inventory calculation approach to predict the forest carbon sink.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we introduce a tool that can be used to estimate the GHG balance for forest land, what we call a \"synthetic inventory\", and validate it by comparing outputs against historical data reported in Finland's GHG inventory. Second, we use it to predict GHG balances in year leading up to 2035 at various roundwood and forest residue harvest rates. The tool can replicate forest GHG balances for forest land with an average annual error of 1.0 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>, representing 4% of the average annual forest carbon sink. We estimate the forest GHG balance in 2035 to be around 3, -15, -32 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>eq at levels of total annual drain 92, 80, 70 Mm<sup>3</sup> respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our calculations the forest land net GHG balance in 2035 is approximately 12 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>eq higher than what is presented in Finland's NECP. Conceptual differences between how GHGI methodologies and scenario models estimate living biomass gains and losses contribute to this outcome, in addition to uncertainties associated with both approaches. The tool presented here shows agreement with the National Inventory Report 2023 approach for forest land, and it can be quickly updated to fit new data.</p>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"20 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the greenhouse gas inventory calculation approach to predict the forest carbon sink.\",\"authors\":\"Fredric Mosley, Jari Niemi, Sampo Soimakallio\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13021-025-00307-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finland's national Climate Act contains a target for carbon neutrality by 2035. Achieving this target not only depends on the effective implementation of emission reductions, but to a large part on the forest carbon sink. A recent publication of the Government's analysis, assessment, and research activities highlights a potential disparity in forest land greenhouse gas (GHG) balance estimates by the ex-ante scenario model used in the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), and the ex-post GHG inventory methodology used for creating an official record of emissions and removals. Better methodological compatibility is needed to answer a key question: How large will the forest carbon sink be in different scenarios? This study is a first attempt to show the usefulness of applying the GHG inventory calculation approach to predict the forest carbon sink.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we introduce a tool that can be used to estimate the GHG balance for forest land, what we call a \\\"synthetic inventory\\\", and validate it by comparing outputs against historical data reported in Finland's GHG inventory. Second, we use it to predict GHG balances in year leading up to 2035 at various roundwood and forest residue harvest rates. The tool can replicate forest GHG balances for forest land with an average annual error of 1.0 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>, representing 4% of the average annual forest carbon sink. We estimate the forest GHG balance in 2035 to be around 3, -15, -32 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>eq at levels of total annual drain 92, 80, 70 Mm<sup>3</sup> respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our calculations the forest land net GHG balance in 2035 is approximately 12 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>eq higher than what is presented in Finland's NECP. Conceptual differences between how GHGI methodologies and scenario models estimate living biomass gains and losses contribute to this outcome, in addition to uncertainties associated with both approaches. The tool presented here shows agreement with the National Inventory Report 2023 approach for forest land, and it can be quickly updated to fit new data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181879/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00307-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00307-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:芬兰的国家气候法案包含到2035年实现碳中和的目标。实现这一目标不仅取决于减排的有效实施,而且在很大程度上取决于森林碳汇。最近公布的政府分析、评估和研究活动强调了国家能源和气候计划(NECP)中使用的事前情景模型和用于创建排放和清除官方记录的事后温室气体清单方法对林地温室气体平衡的估计可能存在差异。需要更好的方法兼容性来回答一个关键问题:在不同的情景下,森林碳汇将有多大?本研究首次展示了利用温室气体盘存计算方法预测森林碳汇的有效性。结果:在本研究中,我们引入了一种可用于估算林地温室气体平衡的工具,我们称之为“综合清单”,并通过将产出与芬兰温室气体清单中报告的历史数据进行比较来验证它。其次,我们用它来预测不同圆木和森林残渣采伐率下到2035年的温室气体平衡。该工具可以复制林地的森林温室气体平衡,年平均误差为1.0 Mt CO2,占森林年平均碳汇的4%。我们估计2035年森林温室气体平衡将分别在年排放总量92,80,70 Mm3的水平上达到3,15,32 Mt co2当量左右。结论:根据我们的计算,2035年森林土地净温室气体平衡比芬兰NECP所呈现的高约12 Mt CO2eq。温室气体排放方法和情景模型估算活生物量收益和损失的概念差异,以及两种方法相关的不确定性,导致了这一结果。本文提供的工具与《2023年国家森林土地清查报告》方法一致,并且可以快速更新以适应新数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the greenhouse gas inventory calculation approach to predict the forest carbon sink.

Background: Finland's national Climate Act contains a target for carbon neutrality by 2035. Achieving this target not only depends on the effective implementation of emission reductions, but to a large part on the forest carbon sink. A recent publication of the Government's analysis, assessment, and research activities highlights a potential disparity in forest land greenhouse gas (GHG) balance estimates by the ex-ante scenario model used in the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), and the ex-post GHG inventory methodology used for creating an official record of emissions and removals. Better methodological compatibility is needed to answer a key question: How large will the forest carbon sink be in different scenarios? This study is a first attempt to show the usefulness of applying the GHG inventory calculation approach to predict the forest carbon sink.

Results: In this study, we introduce a tool that can be used to estimate the GHG balance for forest land, what we call a "synthetic inventory", and validate it by comparing outputs against historical data reported in Finland's GHG inventory. Second, we use it to predict GHG balances in year leading up to 2035 at various roundwood and forest residue harvest rates. The tool can replicate forest GHG balances for forest land with an average annual error of 1.0 Mt CO2, representing 4% of the average annual forest carbon sink. We estimate the forest GHG balance in 2035 to be around 3, -15, -32 Mt CO2eq at levels of total annual drain 92, 80, 70 Mm3 respectively.

Conclusions: According to our calculations the forest land net GHG balance in 2035 is approximately 12 Mt CO2eq higher than what is presented in Finland's NECP. Conceptual differences between how GHGI methodologies and scenario models estimate living biomass gains and losses contribute to this outcome, in addition to uncertainties associated with both approaches. The tool presented here shows agreement with the National Inventory Report 2023 approach for forest land, and it can be quickly updated to fit new data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信