关系流动与普遍信任有关,但与亲密无关:一项针对美国和日本个人的调查

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Yutaka Horita, Miku Yamazaki, Asuka Tahara
{"title":"关系流动与普遍信任有关,但与亲密无关:一项针对美国和日本个人的调查","authors":"Yutaka Horita,&nbsp;Miku Yamazaki,&nbsp;Asuka Tahara","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relational mobility, the degree of opportunity to form new relationships, explains cultural differences in interpersonal behavior. Theoretically, relational mobility is thought to be related to the contrasting tendencies in social networks: expansion of relationships (i.e., trust) and commitment to existing relationships (i.e., intimacy). This study reexamined whether relational mobility is associated with forming and maintaining social networks. We conducted a cross-cultural survey and investigated the correlations between generalized trust, intimacy with friends, self-disclosure, and the number of social networks with the data of 297 American and 292 Japanese people. Consistent with previous studies, this study found that Americans are more likely than the Japanese to trust strangers, feel intimate with and disclose themselves to their closest friends, and have more relationships. Relational mobility explained the cultural difference in generalized trust but not in intimacy with friends when controlling for individual characteristics, such as personality traits. Relational mobility and generalized trust were associated with a greater number of people to seek advice from. Additional analysis showed that a greater number of advice networks was correlated with higher levels of subjective well-being. The results suggest that relational mobility is associated with psychology related to expanding networks, rather than strengthening existing relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajsp.70027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational mobility is associated with generalized trust but not intimacy: A survey of individuals from the U.S. and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Yutaka Horita,&nbsp;Miku Yamazaki,&nbsp;Asuka Tahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajsp.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Relational mobility, the degree of opportunity to form new relationships, explains cultural differences in interpersonal behavior. Theoretically, relational mobility is thought to be related to the contrasting tendencies in social networks: expansion of relationships (i.e., trust) and commitment to existing relationships (i.e., intimacy). This study reexamined whether relational mobility is associated with forming and maintaining social networks. We conducted a cross-cultural survey and investigated the correlations between generalized trust, intimacy with friends, self-disclosure, and the number of social networks with the data of 297 American and 292 Japanese people. Consistent with previous studies, this study found that Americans are more likely than the Japanese to trust strangers, feel intimate with and disclose themselves to their closest friends, and have more relationships. Relational mobility explained the cultural difference in generalized trust but not in intimacy with friends when controlling for individual characteristics, such as personality traits. Relational mobility and generalized trust were associated with a greater number of people to seek advice from. Additional analysis showed that a greater number of advice networks was correlated with higher levels of subjective well-being. The results suggest that relational mobility is associated with psychology related to expanding networks, rather than strengthening existing relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajsp.70027\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.70027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关系流动性,即形成新关系的机会程度,解释了人际行为中的文化差异。从理论上讲,关系流动被认为与社会网络中的对比趋势有关:关系的扩展(即信任)和对现有关系的承诺(即亲密)。这项研究重新审视了关系流动是否与社会网络的形成和维持有关。我们对297名美国人和292名日本人进行了一项跨文化调查,调查了广义信任、与朋友的亲密关系、自我表露和社交网络数量之间的关系。与之前的研究一致,这项研究发现,美国人比日本人更容易信任陌生人,与最亲密的朋友感到亲密并向他们透露自己,并且有更多的关系。关系流动解释了广义信任的文化差异,但在控制个人特征(如人格特征)时,不能解释与朋友亲密关系的文化差异。关系流动性和普遍信任与更多的人寻求建议有关。另外的分析表明,咨询网络的数量越多,主观幸福感越高。研究结果表明,人际关系流动与扩大人际网络的心理有关,而不是与加强现有关系有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relational mobility is associated with generalized trust but not intimacy: A survey of individuals from the U.S. and Japan

Relational mobility is associated with generalized trust but not intimacy: A survey of individuals from the U.S. and Japan

Relational mobility, the degree of opportunity to form new relationships, explains cultural differences in interpersonal behavior. Theoretically, relational mobility is thought to be related to the contrasting tendencies in social networks: expansion of relationships (i.e., trust) and commitment to existing relationships (i.e., intimacy). This study reexamined whether relational mobility is associated with forming and maintaining social networks. We conducted a cross-cultural survey and investigated the correlations between generalized trust, intimacy with friends, self-disclosure, and the number of social networks with the data of 297 American and 292 Japanese people. Consistent with previous studies, this study found that Americans are more likely than the Japanese to trust strangers, feel intimate with and disclose themselves to their closest friends, and have more relationships. Relational mobility explained the cultural difference in generalized trust but not in intimacy with friends when controlling for individual characteristics, such as personality traits. Relational mobility and generalized trust were associated with a greater number of people to seek advice from. Additional analysis showed that a greater number of advice networks was correlated with higher levels of subjective well-being. The results suggest that relational mobility is associated with psychology related to expanding networks, rather than strengthening existing relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信