预结晶与后结晶调整对二硅酸锂基陶瓷疲劳性能影响的比较

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Abdel Rahim Mohamad Abdel Salam Suleiman, Luiza Freitas Brum Souza, Vinícius Felipe Wandscher, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Jovito Adiel Skupien
{"title":"预结晶与后结晶调整对二硅酸锂基陶瓷疲劳性能影响的比较","authors":"Abdel Rahim Mohamad Abdel Salam Suleiman,&nbsp;Luiza Freitas Brum Souza,&nbsp;Vinícius Felipe Wandscher,&nbsp;Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira,&nbsp;Jovito Adiel Skupien","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the timing of adjustment on the fatigue flexural behavior and surface characteristics of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Discs (Ø = 15 and 1.2 mm thickness) of four lithium disilicate-based ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG; Rosetta SM, HASS Corp; T-Lithium, Shenzhen Upcera Dental Technology Co Ltd; Goozir, Shenzhen Yurucheng Dental Materials Co) were obtained and randomly allocated into three groups based on the timing of adjustment factor: CTRL—directly crystallized without any additional treatment; PRE—subjected to adjustment precrystallization; POST—adjusted postcrystallization. The specimens underwent cyclic fatigue biaxial piston-on-three-balls flexural testing (<i>n</i> = 10; 20 Hz frequency, 10,000 cycles per step, initial stress of 100 MPa, and step-size of 25 MPa). Fatigue flexural strength (FFS) and the number of cycles for fatigue failure (CFF) were recorded and submitted to factorial (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]), survival (Kaplan–Meier and Mantel–Cox tests) and Weibull analysis. Surface roughness data were collected and submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc tests. Fractographic and topographic features were descriptively and qualitatively analyzed. Both the adjustment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 49.18) and material (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 11.99) factors showed a statistically significant impact on the FFS and CFF, as did their interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.03 and <i>F</i> = 2.51), indicating higher values for the CTRL and PRE groups compared to the POST group, and for the T-LITHIUM, EMAX, and GOOZIR materials compared to ROSETTA. Regarding the Weibull modulus, all groups showed similar statistical values. Surface roughness was also influenced by both factors (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05—PRE &gt; POST &gt; CTRL). ROSETTA exhibited higher Ra values than EMAX and higher Rz values than both EMAX and TALMAX. Fractures always originated at surface defects in the tensile stress concentration region. Topographic features revealed prominent scratches in the PRE groups due to adjustments, smoother scratches in the POST groups, and polishing scratches in the CTRL groups. Consequently, while precrystallization adjustment increases the roughness of lithium disilicate-based ceramics, it does not affect their fatigue behavior. Meanwhile, postcrystallization adjustment deleteriously affects the flexural fatigue strength. Thus, if needed, adjustments should be made precrystallization of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Also, different lithium disilicate-based ceramics exhibit varying fatigue behaviors; in this study, Rosetta SM showed reduced properties compared to T-Lithium CAD, IPS e.max CAD, and Goozir Lithium Disilicate.</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effect of Precrystallization or Postcrystallization Adjustments on Fatigue Behavior of Lithium Disilicate-Based Ceramics\",\"authors\":\"Abdel Rahim Mohamad Abdel Salam Suleiman,&nbsp;Luiza Freitas Brum Souza,&nbsp;Vinícius Felipe Wandscher,&nbsp;Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira,&nbsp;Jovito Adiel Skupien\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm.b.35608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the timing of adjustment on the fatigue flexural behavior and surface characteristics of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Discs (Ø = 15 and 1.2 mm thickness) of four lithium disilicate-based ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG; Rosetta SM, HASS Corp; T-Lithium, Shenzhen Upcera Dental Technology Co Ltd; Goozir, Shenzhen Yurucheng Dental Materials Co) were obtained and randomly allocated into three groups based on the timing of adjustment factor: CTRL—directly crystallized without any additional treatment; PRE—subjected to adjustment precrystallization; POST—adjusted postcrystallization. The specimens underwent cyclic fatigue biaxial piston-on-three-balls flexural testing (<i>n</i> = 10; 20 Hz frequency, 10,000 cycles per step, initial stress of 100 MPa, and step-size of 25 MPa). Fatigue flexural strength (FFS) and the number of cycles for fatigue failure (CFF) were recorded and submitted to factorial (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]), survival (Kaplan–Meier and Mantel–Cox tests) and Weibull analysis. Surface roughness data were collected and submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc tests. Fractographic and topographic features were descriptively and qualitatively analyzed. Both the adjustment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 49.18) and material (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 11.99) factors showed a statistically significant impact on the FFS and CFF, as did their interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.03 and <i>F</i> = 2.51), indicating higher values for the CTRL and PRE groups compared to the POST group, and for the T-LITHIUM, EMAX, and GOOZIR materials compared to ROSETTA. Regarding the Weibull modulus, all groups showed similar statistical values. Surface roughness was also influenced by both factors (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05—PRE &gt; POST &gt; CTRL). ROSETTA exhibited higher Ra values than EMAX and higher Rz values than both EMAX and TALMAX. Fractures always originated at surface defects in the tensile stress concentration region. Topographic features revealed prominent scratches in the PRE groups due to adjustments, smoother scratches in the POST groups, and polishing scratches in the CTRL groups. Consequently, while precrystallization adjustment increases the roughness of lithium disilicate-based ceramics, it does not affect their fatigue behavior. Meanwhile, postcrystallization adjustment deleteriously affects the flexural fatigue strength. Thus, if needed, adjustments should be made precrystallization of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Also, different lithium disilicate-based ceramics exhibit varying fatigue behaviors; in this study, Rosetta SM showed reduced properties compared to T-Lithium CAD, IPS e.max CAD, and Goozir Lithium Disilicate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"113 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35608\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35608\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估调整时间对二硅酸锂基陶瓷的疲劳弯曲行为和表面特性的影响。四种二硅酸锂基陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG;Rosetta SM, HASS公司;深圳市欧冠牙科科技有限公司;根据调整因子的时间,随机分为三组:按ctrl -直接结晶,不进行任何额外处理;预经调整预结晶;POST-adjusted postcrystallization。试件进行了循环疲劳双轴活塞-三球弯曲试验(n = 10;频率20hz,每步循环10000次,初始应力100mpa,步长25mpa)。记录疲劳弯曲强度(FFS)和疲劳失效循环次数(CFF),并提交因子(双向方差分析[ANOVA])、生存(Kaplan-Meier和Mantel-Cox检验)和威布尔分析。收集表面粗糙度数据并提交双向方差分析和Tukey's事后检验。对断口形貌和地形特征进行了描述性和定性分析。调整因素(p < 0.0001, F = 49.18)和材料因素(p < 0.0001, F = 11.99)对FFS和CFF的影响具有统计学意义,它们的相互作用(p = 0.03, F = 2.51)也具有统计学意义,表明CTRL和PRE组的数值高于POST组,T-LITHIUM、EMAX和GOOZIR材料的数值高于ROSETTA。在Weibull模量方面,各组统计值相近。表面粗糙度也受到这两个因素的影响(p < 0.05-PRE >;文章在CTRL)。ROSETTA的Ra值高于EMAX, Rz值高于EMAX和TALMAX。断裂通常起源于拉应力集中区的表面缺陷。地形特征显示,PRE组由于调整造成的划痕明显,POST组划痕较光滑,CTRL组划痕为抛光划痕。因此,预结晶调整虽然增加了二硅酸锂基陶瓷的粗糙度,但不影响其疲劳行为。同时,结晶后调整对弯曲疲劳强度有不利影响。因此,如果需要,应调整预结晶的二硅酸锂基陶瓷。此外,不同的二硅酸锂基陶瓷表现出不同的疲劳行为;在这项研究中,与T-Lithium CAD、IPS e.max CAD和Goozir二硅酸锂相比,Rosetta SM的性能有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing the Effect of Precrystallization or Postcrystallization Adjustments on Fatigue Behavior of Lithium Disilicate-Based Ceramics

Comparing the Effect of Precrystallization or Postcrystallization Adjustments on Fatigue Behavior of Lithium Disilicate-Based Ceramics

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the timing of adjustment on the fatigue flexural behavior and surface characteristics of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Discs (Ø = 15 and 1.2 mm thickness) of four lithium disilicate-based ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG; Rosetta SM, HASS Corp; T-Lithium, Shenzhen Upcera Dental Technology Co Ltd; Goozir, Shenzhen Yurucheng Dental Materials Co) were obtained and randomly allocated into three groups based on the timing of adjustment factor: CTRL—directly crystallized without any additional treatment; PRE—subjected to adjustment precrystallization; POST—adjusted postcrystallization. The specimens underwent cyclic fatigue biaxial piston-on-three-balls flexural testing (n = 10; 20 Hz frequency, 10,000 cycles per step, initial stress of 100 MPa, and step-size of 25 MPa). Fatigue flexural strength (FFS) and the number of cycles for fatigue failure (CFF) were recorded and submitted to factorial (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]), survival (Kaplan–Meier and Mantel–Cox tests) and Weibull analysis. Surface roughness data were collected and submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc tests. Fractographic and topographic features were descriptively and qualitatively analyzed. Both the adjustment (p < 0.0001 and F = 49.18) and material (p < 0.0001 and F = 11.99) factors showed a statistically significant impact on the FFS and CFF, as did their interaction (p = 0.03 and F = 2.51), indicating higher values for the CTRL and PRE groups compared to the POST group, and for the T-LITHIUM, EMAX, and GOOZIR materials compared to ROSETTA. Regarding the Weibull modulus, all groups showed similar statistical values. Surface roughness was also influenced by both factors (p < 0.05—PRE > POST > CTRL). ROSETTA exhibited higher Ra values than EMAX and higher Rz values than both EMAX and TALMAX. Fractures always originated at surface defects in the tensile stress concentration region. Topographic features revealed prominent scratches in the PRE groups due to adjustments, smoother scratches in the POST groups, and polishing scratches in the CTRL groups. Consequently, while precrystallization adjustment increases the roughness of lithium disilicate-based ceramics, it does not affect their fatigue behavior. Meanwhile, postcrystallization adjustment deleteriously affects the flexural fatigue strength. Thus, if needed, adjustments should be made precrystallization of lithium disilicate-based ceramics. Also, different lithium disilicate-based ceramics exhibit varying fatigue behaviors; in this study, Rosetta SM showed reduced properties compared to T-Lithium CAD, IPS e.max CAD, and Goozir Lithium Disilicate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信