Dániel Z. Kádár , Jihong Zhao , Juliane House , Fengguang Liu
{"title":"从语用学的角度看汉语的表面邀请","authors":"Dániel Z. Kádár , Jihong Zhao , Juliane House , Fengguang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we examine ostensible invitations in Chinese, i.e. cases where an interactant invites the addressee to an event when both participants are aware of the fact that the invitation is not a real one. In order to identify pragmatic similarities and differences between ostensible and genuine invitations, we compare two corpora of naturally-occurring online exchanges on WeChat, including 70 ostensible and 70 genuine invitations. Our analysis shows that ostensible invitations in our data tend to be indicated by formulaic expressions and realised in typically ritual ways through which the inviter displays her goodwill. We hope to fill a knowledge gap because previous studies have mostly investigated ostensible refusals of invitations in Chinese rather than ostensible invitations. We also hope to contribute to previous research on ostensible invitations, by revisiting the seminal study of Isaacs and Clark (1990), which has either been applied as a departure point for investigating ostensible invitations in non-Western linguacultures, or has been entirely dismissed on cultural grounds. We propose a middle ground between these views, by following a bottom-up approach to ostensible invitations and using a system which combines ritual, expressions, speech acts and interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ostensible invitations in Chinese – A pragmatic perspective\",\"authors\":\"Dániel Z. Kádár , Jihong Zhao , Juliane House , Fengguang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we examine ostensible invitations in Chinese, i.e. cases where an interactant invites the addressee to an event when both participants are aware of the fact that the invitation is not a real one. In order to identify pragmatic similarities and differences between ostensible and genuine invitations, we compare two corpora of naturally-occurring online exchanges on WeChat, including 70 ostensible and 70 genuine invitations. Our analysis shows that ostensible invitations in our data tend to be indicated by formulaic expressions and realised in typically ritual ways through which the inviter displays her goodwill. We hope to fill a knowledge gap because previous studies have mostly investigated ostensible refusals of invitations in Chinese rather than ostensible invitations. We also hope to contribute to previous research on ostensible invitations, by revisiting the seminal study of Isaacs and Clark (1990), which has either been applied as a departure point for investigating ostensible invitations in non-Western linguacultures, or has been entirely dismissed on cultural grounds. We propose a middle ground between these views, by following a bottom-up approach to ostensible invitations and using a system which combines ritual, expressions, speech acts and interaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Sciences\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000373\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ostensible invitations in Chinese – A pragmatic perspective
In this study, we examine ostensible invitations in Chinese, i.e. cases where an interactant invites the addressee to an event when both participants are aware of the fact that the invitation is not a real one. In order to identify pragmatic similarities and differences between ostensible and genuine invitations, we compare two corpora of naturally-occurring online exchanges on WeChat, including 70 ostensible and 70 genuine invitations. Our analysis shows that ostensible invitations in our data tend to be indicated by formulaic expressions and realised in typically ritual ways through which the inviter displays her goodwill. We hope to fill a knowledge gap because previous studies have mostly investigated ostensible refusals of invitations in Chinese rather than ostensible invitations. We also hope to contribute to previous research on ostensible invitations, by revisiting the seminal study of Isaacs and Clark (1990), which has either been applied as a departure point for investigating ostensible invitations in non-Western linguacultures, or has been entirely dismissed on cultural grounds. We propose a middle ground between these views, by following a bottom-up approach to ostensible invitations and using a system which combines ritual, expressions, speech acts and interaction.
期刊介绍:
Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.