{"title":"德语学习者对第二语言阿拉伯语咽音化和元音时长的声学分析","authors":"Hicham Adem","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study investigates Arabic vowel production among adult German learners (NNS), addressing a significant gap in the literature. Ten German learners (five males and five females) produced six Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) short and long vowels (/i, i:, u, u:, a, a:/) in both plain and pharyngealized contexts, with ten native Palestinian Arabic speakers (ANS) serving as the comparison group. Pharyngealization was induced by the presence of emphatic consonants (/sˤ, dˤ, tˤ, ðˤ/). The research examined vowel duration, acoustic vowel space, and formant frequencies (F1 and F2) of the target vowels. ANOVA analyses were conducted to examine group differences, while a mixed-effects model was applied to vowel duration to account for speaker variability. F2 lowering was identified as a reliable acoustic correlate of pharyngealization for both groups. The results suggest that NNS successfully maintain pharyngealization in Arabic, further supporting the Speech Learning Model (SLM) predictions. Unlike previous studies, F1 values decreased for pharyngealized vowels in both groups. While NNS speakers preserved vowel length contrasts, they exhibited less vowel backing and fronting than ANS speakers, consistent with prior research. Additionally, NNS exhibited a more compressed vowel space compared to ANS, which may reduce vowel distinctiveness and influence speech intelligibility. The study also discusses pedagogical implications, particularly for Arabic L2 phonetic training, and acknowledges its limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic analysis of pharyngealization and vowel duration in L2 Arabic by German learners\",\"authors\":\"Hicham Adem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The present study investigates Arabic vowel production among adult German learners (NNS), addressing a significant gap in the literature. Ten German learners (five males and five females) produced six Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) short and long vowels (/i, i:, u, u:, a, a:/) in both plain and pharyngealized contexts, with ten native Palestinian Arabic speakers (ANS) serving as the comparison group. Pharyngealization was induced by the presence of emphatic consonants (/sˤ, dˤ, tˤ, ðˤ/). The research examined vowel duration, acoustic vowel space, and formant frequencies (F1 and F2) of the target vowels. ANOVA analyses were conducted to examine group differences, while a mixed-effects model was applied to vowel duration to account for speaker variability. F2 lowering was identified as a reliable acoustic correlate of pharyngealization for both groups. The results suggest that NNS successfully maintain pharyngealization in Arabic, further supporting the Speech Learning Model (SLM) predictions. Unlike previous studies, F1 values decreased for pharyngealized vowels in both groups. While NNS speakers preserved vowel length contrasts, they exhibited less vowel backing and fronting than ANS speakers, consistent with prior research. Additionally, NNS exhibited a more compressed vowel space compared to ANS, which may reduce vowel distinctiveness and influence speech intelligibility. The study also discusses pedagogical implications, particularly for Arabic L2 phonetic training, and acknowledges its limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125004048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125004048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究调查了成人德语学习者(NNS)中阿拉伯语元音的产生,解决了文献中的一个重大空白。10名德语学习者(5名男性和5名女性)在普通和咽喉化的语境中都能发出6个现代标准阿拉伯语(MSA)短元音和长元音(/i, i:, u, u:, a, a:/), 10名巴勒斯坦阿拉伯语母语者(ANS)作为对照组。重读辅音(/s /, d /, t /, ð /)的存在引起咽化。该研究检查了目标元音的元音持续时间、声学元音空间和形成频率(F1和F2)。方差分析用于检验群体差异,而混合效应模型应用于元音持续时间,以解释说话者的差异。F2降低被确定为两组咽化的可靠声学相关性。结果表明,神经网络成功地维持了阿拉伯语的咽化,进一步支持了语音学习模型(SLM)的预测。与之前的研究不同,两组中咽部化元音的F1值都有所下降。虽然说NNS的人保留了元音长度的对比,但他们比说ANS的人表现出更少的元音后移和前移,这与先前的研究一致。此外,与ANS相比,NNS表现出更压缩的元音空间,这可能会降低元音的独特性并影响语音的可理解性。该研究还讨论了教学意义,特别是对阿拉伯语第二语言语音训练,并承认其局限性。
Acoustic analysis of pharyngealization and vowel duration in L2 Arabic by German learners
The present study investigates Arabic vowel production among adult German learners (NNS), addressing a significant gap in the literature. Ten German learners (five males and five females) produced six Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) short and long vowels (/i, i:, u, u:, a, a:/) in both plain and pharyngealized contexts, with ten native Palestinian Arabic speakers (ANS) serving as the comparison group. Pharyngealization was induced by the presence of emphatic consonants (/sˤ, dˤ, tˤ, ðˤ/). The research examined vowel duration, acoustic vowel space, and formant frequencies (F1 and F2) of the target vowels. ANOVA analyses were conducted to examine group differences, while a mixed-effects model was applied to vowel duration to account for speaker variability. F2 lowering was identified as a reliable acoustic correlate of pharyngealization for both groups. The results suggest that NNS successfully maintain pharyngealization in Arabic, further supporting the Speech Learning Model (SLM) predictions. Unlike previous studies, F1 values decreased for pharyngealized vowels in both groups. While NNS speakers preserved vowel length contrasts, they exhibited less vowel backing and fronting than ANS speakers, consistent with prior research. Additionally, NNS exhibited a more compressed vowel space compared to ANS, which may reduce vowel distinctiveness and influence speech intelligibility. The study also discusses pedagogical implications, particularly for Arabic L2 phonetic training, and acknowledges its limitations.