{"title":"探讨中国利益相关者对学校检查标准在展示教育质量方面的看法:意见的差异是否反映了不同的学校背景?","authors":"Hong Zheng , Sally M. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether discrepancies exist in stakeholder perceptions of the, importance and relevance of school inspection criteria for demonstrating educational, quality in different school contexts in one Chinese city, as well as the underlying factors, that may explain any identified discrepancies. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a stakeholder questionnaire conducted in 10 schools (n = 364) followed by, interviews (n = 13). The findings demonstrated that differences do exist between, schools in teachers’ priorities for school inspection indicators and in particular there, were statistically significant differences between one urban low-performing school and all other schools. The interview evidence from the urban low-performing school was, contrasted with perspectives from local policy makers and teachers in other schools., Overall, the findings demonstrate that inspection processes and school improvement, could be better promoted by more involvement of teachers and local stakeholders’, voices, acknowledging local contexts and strengthening teaching and learning, processes, particularly for disadvantaged schools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Chinese stakeholders’ perceptions of school inspection criteria in demonstrating educational quality: Do discrepancies in opinions reflect different school contexts?\",\"authors\":\"Hong Zheng , Sally M. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates whether discrepancies exist in stakeholder perceptions of the, importance and relevance of school inspection criteria for demonstrating educational, quality in different school contexts in one Chinese city, as well as the underlying factors, that may explain any identified discrepancies. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a stakeholder questionnaire conducted in 10 schools (n = 364) followed by, interviews (n = 13). The findings demonstrated that differences do exist between, schools in teachers’ priorities for school inspection indicators and in particular there, were statistically significant differences between one urban low-performing school and all other schools. The interview evidence from the urban low-performing school was, contrasted with perspectives from local policy makers and teachers in other schools., Overall, the findings demonstrate that inspection processes and school improvement, could be better promoted by more involvement of teachers and local stakeholders’, voices, acknowledging local contexts and strengthening teaching and learning, processes, particularly for disadvantaged schools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Chinese stakeholders’ perceptions of school inspection criteria in demonstrating educational quality: Do discrepancies in opinions reflect different school contexts?
This study investigates whether discrepancies exist in stakeholder perceptions of the, importance and relevance of school inspection criteria for demonstrating educational, quality in different school contexts in one Chinese city, as well as the underlying factors, that may explain any identified discrepancies. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a stakeholder questionnaire conducted in 10 schools (n = 364) followed by, interviews (n = 13). The findings demonstrated that differences do exist between, schools in teachers’ priorities for school inspection indicators and in particular there, were statistically significant differences between one urban low-performing school and all other schools. The interview evidence from the urban low-performing school was, contrasted with perspectives from local policy makers and teachers in other schools., Overall, the findings demonstrate that inspection processes and school improvement, could be better promoted by more involvement of teachers and local stakeholders’, voices, acknowledging local contexts and strengthening teaching and learning, processes, particularly for disadvantaged schools.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.