SARS-CoV-2感染后成人记忆功能的变化:来自Covid和认知在线研究的发现

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Josefina Weinerova , Sabine Yeung , Panyuan Guo , Alice Yau , Connor Horne , Molly Ghinn , Lyn Curtis , Francess Adlard , Vidita Bhagat , Seraphina Zhang , Muzaffer Kaser , Mirjana Bozic , Denis Schluppeck , Andrew Reid , Roni Tibon , Lucy Cheke
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2感染后成人记忆功能的变化:来自Covid和认知在线研究的发现","authors":"Josefina Weinerova ,&nbsp;Sabine Yeung ,&nbsp;Panyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Alice Yau ,&nbsp;Connor Horne ,&nbsp;Molly Ghinn ,&nbsp;Lyn Curtis ,&nbsp;Francess Adlard ,&nbsp;Vidita Bhagat ,&nbsp;Seraphina Zhang ,&nbsp;Muzaffer Kaser ,&nbsp;Mirjana Bozic ,&nbsp;Denis Schluppeck ,&nbsp;Andrew Reid ,&nbsp;Roni Tibon ,&nbsp;Lucy Cheke","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic, has been shown to have an impact on cognitive function, but the specific aspects of cognition that are affected remain unclear. In this Registered Report, we analysed cognitive data collected online from 296 participants (209 who had experienced Covid-19 infection and 87 who did not). We have found previously reported effect of Covid status on accuracy in 2 long-term memory tasks (verbal item memory task and nonverbal associative memory task), but did not replicate previously reported effect on reaction times. Further, across 4 long-term memory tasks, we found consistent effect of Covid status on memory accuracy but not reaction times. Contrary to our predictions, we did not find an interaction with memory type (associative versus item) or stimulus type (verbal versus nonverbal). Moreover, we compared cognitive functioning amongst vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals to explore the role of vaccination status in cognitive symptoms associated with Covid-19. Using Bayesian analysis, we did not find conclusive evidence for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Overall, the study replicates and extends previously reported findings, thereby providing valuable insights into the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cognitive functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"189 ","pages":"Pages 205-225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in memory function in adults following SARS-CoV-2 infection: Findings from the Covid and Cognition online study\",\"authors\":\"Josefina Weinerova ,&nbsp;Sabine Yeung ,&nbsp;Panyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Alice Yau ,&nbsp;Connor Horne ,&nbsp;Molly Ghinn ,&nbsp;Lyn Curtis ,&nbsp;Francess Adlard ,&nbsp;Vidita Bhagat ,&nbsp;Seraphina Zhang ,&nbsp;Muzaffer Kaser ,&nbsp;Mirjana Bozic ,&nbsp;Denis Schluppeck ,&nbsp;Andrew Reid ,&nbsp;Roni Tibon ,&nbsp;Lucy Cheke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic, has been shown to have an impact on cognitive function, but the specific aspects of cognition that are affected remain unclear. In this Registered Report, we analysed cognitive data collected online from 296 participants (209 who had experienced Covid-19 infection and 87 who did not). We have found previously reported effect of Covid status on accuracy in 2 long-term memory tasks (verbal item memory task and nonverbal associative memory task), but did not replicate previously reported effect on reaction times. Further, across 4 long-term memory tasks, we found consistent effect of Covid status on memory accuracy but not reaction times. Contrary to our predictions, we did not find an interaction with memory type (associative versus item) or stimulus type (verbal versus nonverbal). Moreover, we compared cognitive functioning amongst vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals to explore the role of vaccination status in cognitive symptoms associated with Covid-19. Using Bayesian analysis, we did not find conclusive evidence for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Overall, the study replicates and extends previously reported findings, thereby providing valuable insights into the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cognitive functions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cortex\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 205-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945225001583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945225001583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导致新冠肺炎大流行的病毒SARS-CoV-2已被证明会对认知功能产生影响,但受影响的认知的具体方面仍不清楚。在这份注册报告中,我们分析了从296名参与者(209名感染过Covid-19, 87名没有感染过)在线收集的认知数据。我们发现先前报道的Covid状态对2个长期记忆任务(言语项目记忆任务和非言语联想记忆任务)准确性的影响,但没有重复先前报道的对反应时间的影响。此外,在4个长期记忆任务中,我们发现Covid状态对记忆准确性的影响是一致的,但对反应时间没有影响。与我们的预测相反,我们没有发现记忆类型(联想与项目)或刺激类型(言语与非言语)之间的相互作用。此外,我们比较了接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的个体的认知功能,以探索疫苗接种状况在与Covid-19相关的认知症状中的作用。使用贝叶斯分析,我们没有发现零假设或备择假设的确凿证据。总体而言,该研究重复并扩展了先前报道的发现,从而为SARS-CoV-2感染对认知功能的影响提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in memory function in adults following SARS-CoV-2 infection: Findings from the Covid and Cognition online study
SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic, has been shown to have an impact on cognitive function, but the specific aspects of cognition that are affected remain unclear. In this Registered Report, we analysed cognitive data collected online from 296 participants (209 who had experienced Covid-19 infection and 87 who did not). We have found previously reported effect of Covid status on accuracy in 2 long-term memory tasks (verbal item memory task and nonverbal associative memory task), but did not replicate previously reported effect on reaction times. Further, across 4 long-term memory tasks, we found consistent effect of Covid status on memory accuracy but not reaction times. Contrary to our predictions, we did not find an interaction with memory type (associative versus item) or stimulus type (verbal versus nonverbal). Moreover, we compared cognitive functioning amongst vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals to explore the role of vaccination status in cognitive symptoms associated with Covid-19. Using Bayesian analysis, we did not find conclusive evidence for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Overall, the study replicates and extends previously reported findings, thereby providing valuable insights into the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cognitive functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信