鸟射性脉络膜视网膜病变的证据和基于共识的多模式成像指南-葡萄膜炎(MUV)工作组报告8:鸟射性脉络膜视网膜病变的成像指南

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
FRANCESCO PICHI , ELISABETTA MISEROCCHI , DILRAJ S. GREWAL , SUMIT SHARMA , ANTOINE P. BRÉZIN , BAHRAM BODAGHI , ANIRUDDHA AGARWAL , DOUGLAS A. JABS , AMANI FAWZI , DAVID SARRAF , VISHALI GUPTA
{"title":"鸟射性脉络膜视网膜病变的证据和基于共识的多模式成像指南-葡萄膜炎(MUV)工作组报告8:鸟射性脉络膜视网膜病变的成像指南","authors":"FRANCESCO PICHI ,&nbsp;ELISABETTA MISEROCCHI ,&nbsp;DILRAJ S. GREWAL ,&nbsp;SUMIT SHARMA ,&nbsp;ANTOINE P. BRÉZIN ,&nbsp;BAHRAM BODAGHI ,&nbsp;ANIRUDDHA AGARWAL ,&nbsp;DOUGLAS A. JABS ,&nbsp;AMANI FAWZI ,&nbsp;DAVID SARRAF ,&nbsp;VISHALI GUPTA","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop consensus-based imaging guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Consensus-based approach guided by literature and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An expert committee of 5 international uveitis specialists reviewed 15 well-documented representative BSCR cases with comprehensive imaging data. Cases with active and inactive disease were included. Imaging, including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. Using a structured NGT approach, consensus-based recommendations were developed for specific disease characteristics, biomarkers of activity, and complications. The recommendations were voted upon by members of the full task force.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the diagnosis of BSCR, CFP, FFA, and ICGA were identified as the key imaging modalities. ICGA was identified as a key imaging modality for assessing the presence of choroidal lesions. FFA was deemed crucial for monitoring retinal vascular leakage and assessing the treatment response. OCT, while not essential for diagnosis, was valuable for detecting complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal thinning. The committee did not reach a consensus on the role of FAF and OCTA for the diagnosis or monitoring of BSCR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The MUV consensus-based imaging guidelines for BSCR expand the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria by reaffirming the critical role of ICGA and providing a standardized guidelines for using other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of BSCR. These guidelines are expected to facilitate monitoring of disease activity and complications using multimodal imaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 271-281"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence and Consensus-based Imaging Guidelines in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy: Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 8\",\"authors\":\"FRANCESCO PICHI ,&nbsp;ELISABETTA MISEROCCHI ,&nbsp;DILRAJ S. GREWAL ,&nbsp;SUMIT SHARMA ,&nbsp;ANTOINE P. BRÉZIN ,&nbsp;BAHRAM BODAGHI ,&nbsp;ANIRUDDHA AGARWAL ,&nbsp;DOUGLAS A. JABS ,&nbsp;AMANI FAWZI ,&nbsp;DAVID SARRAF ,&nbsp;VISHALI GUPTA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop consensus-based imaging guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Consensus-based approach guided by literature and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An expert committee of 5 international uveitis specialists reviewed 15 well-documented representative BSCR cases with comprehensive imaging data. Cases with active and inactive disease were included. Imaging, including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. Using a structured NGT approach, consensus-based recommendations were developed for specific disease characteristics, biomarkers of activity, and complications. The recommendations were voted upon by members of the full task force.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the diagnosis of BSCR, CFP, FFA, and ICGA were identified as the key imaging modalities. ICGA was identified as a key imaging modality for assessing the presence of choroidal lesions. FFA was deemed crucial for monitoring retinal vascular leakage and assessing the treatment response. OCT, while not essential for diagnosis, was valuable for detecting complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal thinning. The committee did not reach a consensus on the role of FAF and OCTA for the diagnosis or monitoring of BSCR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The MUV consensus-based imaging guidelines for BSCR expand the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria by reaffirming the critical role of ICGA and providing a standardized guidelines for using other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of BSCR. These guidelines are expected to facilitate monitoring of disease activity and complications using multimodal imaging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 271-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425003332\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425003332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为鸟射性脉络膜视网膜病变(BSCR)的诊断和监测制定基于共识的影像学指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence and Consensus-based Imaging Guidelines in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy: Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 8

Purpose

To develop consensus-based imaging guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR).

Design

Consensus-based approach guided by literature and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT).

Methods

An expert committee of 5 international uveitis specialists reviewed 15 well-documented representative BSCR cases with comprehensive imaging data. Cases with active and inactive disease were included. Imaging, including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. Using a structured NGT approach, consensus-based recommendations were developed for specific disease characteristics, biomarkers of activity, and complications. The recommendations were voted upon by members of the full task force.

Results

For the diagnosis of BSCR, CFP, FFA, and ICGA were identified as the key imaging modalities. ICGA was identified as a key imaging modality for assessing the presence of choroidal lesions. FFA was deemed crucial for monitoring retinal vascular leakage and assessing the treatment response. OCT, while not essential for diagnosis, was valuable for detecting complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal thinning. The committee did not reach a consensus on the role of FAF and OCTA for the diagnosis or monitoring of BSCR.

Conclusions

The MUV consensus-based imaging guidelines for BSCR expand the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria by reaffirming the critical role of ICGA and providing a standardized guidelines for using other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of BSCR. These guidelines are expected to facilitate monitoring of disease activity and complications using multimodal imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信