Shayan Massoumi , John Stoffer , Brenton T. Bicknell , Josephine M. Rudd Zhong Manis , Haley Chishom , Yejin Heo , Lance Dzubinski , Alvina Liang , Taylor L. Aaserud , Thanushri Srikantha , Robert Tauscher , Tatyana Milman , Maura Di Nicola , Basil K. Williams Jr.
{"title":"眼肿瘤学家和眼科病理学家在学术眼科:在美国当前劳动力的描述性分析","authors":"Shayan Massoumi , John Stoffer , Brenton T. Bicknell , Josephine M. Rudd Zhong Manis , Haley Chishom , Yejin Heo , Lance Dzubinski , Alvina Liang , Taylor L. Aaserud , Thanushri Srikantha , Robert Tauscher , Tatyana Milman , Maura Di Nicola , Basil K. Williams Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the academic profiles, leadership roles, research productivity, and gender disparities of ocular oncologists and ophthalmic pathologists (OOPs) and compare them with all other ophthalmologists (AOOs).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects, Participants, and/or Controls</h3><div>Faculty from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited US ophthalmology residency programs for the 2024-2025 academic year were included. OOPs were identified by fellowship training in ocular oncology or ophthalmic pathology; all other faculty served as the comparison group (AOOs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available data from institutional websites were used to identify demographic characteristics, training history, academic rank, leadership roles, and Scopus-based research metrics. Chi-square tests, logistic regression, and ordinal regression models were used to assess group differences, with significance set at <em>P < .</em>05.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Academic rank, leadership roles, H-index, and gender representation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 86 identified OOPs, a significantly greater proportion held graduate degrees and had completed multiple fellowships compared with AOOs. A majority of OOPs were international medical graduates. OOPs had higher odds of holding leadership roles and attaining full professorship and demonstrated significantly higher research productivity across all career stages. Gender disparities in H-index and academic rank were observed on univariable analysis but were not significant on multivariable analysis. H-index was the strongest predictor of academic advancement. OOPs were geographically clustered in states with major academic centers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OOPs demonstrate unique academic profiles marked by high research productivity, advanced degrees, and greater representation in leadership. Gender disparities diminish when accounting for academic output, suggesting that research productivity remains the key driver of promotion in this subspecialty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 156-165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocular Oncologists and Ophthalmic Pathologists in Academic Ophthalmology: A Descriptive Analysis of the Current Workforce in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Shayan Massoumi , John Stoffer , Brenton T. Bicknell , Josephine M. Rudd Zhong Manis , Haley Chishom , Yejin Heo , Lance Dzubinski , Alvina Liang , Taylor L. Aaserud , Thanushri Srikantha , Robert Tauscher , Tatyana Milman , Maura Di Nicola , Basil K. Williams Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the academic profiles, leadership roles, research productivity, and gender disparities of ocular oncologists and ophthalmic pathologists (OOPs) and compare them with all other ophthalmologists (AOOs).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects, Participants, and/or Controls</h3><div>Faculty from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited US ophthalmology residency programs for the 2024-2025 academic year were included. OOPs were identified by fellowship training in ocular oncology or ophthalmic pathology; all other faculty served as the comparison group (AOOs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available data from institutional websites were used to identify demographic characteristics, training history, academic rank, leadership roles, and Scopus-based research metrics. Chi-square tests, logistic regression, and ordinal regression models were used to assess group differences, with significance set at <em>P < .</em>05.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Academic rank, leadership roles, H-index, and gender representation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 86 identified OOPs, a significantly greater proportion held graduate degrees and had completed multiple fellowships compared with AOOs. A majority of OOPs were international medical graduates. OOPs had higher odds of holding leadership roles and attaining full professorship and demonstrated significantly higher research productivity across all career stages. Gender disparities in H-index and academic rank were observed on univariable analysis but were not significant on multivariable analysis. H-index was the strongest predictor of academic advancement. OOPs were geographically clustered in states with major academic centers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OOPs demonstrate unique academic profiles marked by high research productivity, advanced degrees, and greater representation in leadership. Gender disparities diminish when accounting for academic output, suggesting that research productivity remains the key driver of promotion in this subspecialty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 156-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425003083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425003083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ocular Oncologists and Ophthalmic Pathologists in Academic Ophthalmology: A Descriptive Analysis of the Current Workforce in the United States
Objective
To characterize the academic profiles, leadership roles, research productivity, and gender disparities of ocular oncologists and ophthalmic pathologists (OOPs) and compare them with all other ophthalmologists (AOOs).
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Subjects, Participants, and/or Controls
Faculty from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited US ophthalmology residency programs for the 2024-2025 academic year were included. OOPs were identified by fellowship training in ocular oncology or ophthalmic pathology; all other faculty served as the comparison group (AOOs).
Methods
Publicly available data from institutional websites were used to identify demographic characteristics, training history, academic rank, leadership roles, and Scopus-based research metrics. Chi-square tests, logistic regression, and ordinal regression models were used to assess group differences, with significance set at P < .05.
Main Outcome Measures
Academic rank, leadership roles, H-index, and gender representation.
Results
Among 86 identified OOPs, a significantly greater proportion held graduate degrees and had completed multiple fellowships compared with AOOs. A majority of OOPs were international medical graduates. OOPs had higher odds of holding leadership roles and attaining full professorship and demonstrated significantly higher research productivity across all career stages. Gender disparities in H-index and academic rank were observed on univariable analysis but were not significant on multivariable analysis. H-index was the strongest predictor of academic advancement. OOPs were geographically clustered in states with major academic centers.
Conclusions
OOPs demonstrate unique academic profiles marked by high research productivity, advanced degrees, and greater representation in leadership. Gender disparities diminish when accounting for academic output, suggesting that research productivity remains the key driver of promotion in this subspecialty.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.