种族对非小细胞肺癌患者抗pd -(L)1单克隆抗体的影响:系统文献综述和荟萃分析

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Carlo Genova , Federico Cappuzzo , Giorgio Minotti , Nicola Normanno , Barry Rodgers-Gray , Nicola Waghorne , Silvia Novello , Marcello Tiseo
{"title":"种族对非小细胞肺癌患者抗pd -(L)1单克隆抗体的影响:系统文献综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Carlo Genova ,&nbsp;Federico Cappuzzo ,&nbsp;Giorgio Minotti ,&nbsp;Nicola Normanno ,&nbsp;Barry Rodgers-Gray ,&nbsp;Nicola Waghorne ,&nbsp;Silvia Novello ,&nbsp;Marcello Tiseo","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 85 % of lung cancers, with five-year survival only 4.5 % for metastatic disease. Programmed death (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors have advanced NSCLC treatment, but patient demographics can potentially affect clinical outcomes. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to determine if the benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in NSCLC are independent of race (bio-geographic background).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and World Health Organization Global Index Medicus were systematically searched (inception-to-Aug-2024). Primary analysis focused on studies with subgroup analysis (White vs Asian, White vs Non-White, Asian vs Non-Asian) of anti-PD-(L)1 efficacy in both resectable/localized and unresectable/advanced NSCLC. Subgroup analysis included stratification by PD-L1 expression, treatment line, and treatment regimen. Bayesian inferential meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with ≥ 1 study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 4406 records, 22 randomized controlled trials, 3 pooled analyses, and 2 pharmacokinetic studies were included. In unresectable/advanced NSCLC, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) for White (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95 % credible interval [95 % CrI] 0.74–0.87, p &lt; 0.001 and HR 0.68; 95 % CrI 0.61–0.77, p &lt; 0.001, respectively) and Asian (HR 0.81; 95 % CrI 0.69–0.96, p = 0.027 and HR 0.63; 95 % CrI 0.50–0.80, p = 0.002) patients. The significant improvements in PFS were maintained for both groups within all sub-analyses. Limited data prohibited conduction of meta-analysis for resectable/localized NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in unresectable/advanced NSCLC appear similar for White and Asian patients. Increased quality and quantity of data is required to draw definitive conclusions for resectable/localized NSCLC and with respect to treatment line/regimen and PD-L1 expression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 104812"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of race on anti-PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Genova ,&nbsp;Federico Cappuzzo ,&nbsp;Giorgio Minotti ,&nbsp;Nicola Normanno ,&nbsp;Barry Rodgers-Gray ,&nbsp;Nicola Waghorne ,&nbsp;Silvia Novello ,&nbsp;Marcello Tiseo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 85 % of lung cancers, with five-year survival only 4.5 % for metastatic disease. Programmed death (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors have advanced NSCLC treatment, but patient demographics can potentially affect clinical outcomes. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to determine if the benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in NSCLC are independent of race (bio-geographic background).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and World Health Organization Global Index Medicus were systematically searched (inception-to-Aug-2024). Primary analysis focused on studies with subgroup analysis (White vs Asian, White vs Non-White, Asian vs Non-Asian) of anti-PD-(L)1 efficacy in both resectable/localized and unresectable/advanced NSCLC. Subgroup analysis included stratification by PD-L1 expression, treatment line, and treatment regimen. Bayesian inferential meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with ≥ 1 study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 4406 records, 22 randomized controlled trials, 3 pooled analyses, and 2 pharmacokinetic studies were included. In unresectable/advanced NSCLC, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) for White (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95 % credible interval [95 % CrI] 0.74–0.87, p &lt; 0.001 and HR 0.68; 95 % CrI 0.61–0.77, p &lt; 0.001, respectively) and Asian (HR 0.81; 95 % CrI 0.69–0.96, p = 0.027 and HR 0.63; 95 % CrI 0.50–0.80, p = 0.002) patients. The significant improvements in PFS were maintained for both groups within all sub-analyses. Limited data prohibited conduction of meta-analysis for resectable/localized NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in unresectable/advanced NSCLC appear similar for White and Asian patients. Increased quality and quantity of data is required to draw definitive conclusions for resectable/localized NSCLC and with respect to treatment line/regimen and PD-L1 expression.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825002008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825002008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)约占肺癌的85%,转移性疾病的5年生存率仅为4.5%。程序性死亡(配体)-1 (PD-[L]1)抑制剂可用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗,但患者的人口统计学特征可能会影响临床结果。本研究进行了系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析,以确定抗pd -(L)1治疗在非小细胞肺癌中的益处是否与种族(生物地理背景)无关。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和World Health Organization Global Index Medicus (inception- aug -2024)。主要分析集中在亚组分析研究(白人与亚洲人,白人与非白人,亚洲人与非亚洲人)中抗pd -(L)1在可切除/局部和不可切除/晚期NSCLC中的疗效。亚组分析包括按PD-L1表达、治疗线和治疗方案分层。≥1项研究的结果进行贝叶斯推理荟萃分析。结果:从4406份记录中,包括22项随机对照试验、3项合并分析和2项药代动力学研究。在不可切除/晚期NSCLC中,抗pd -(L)1治疗显著提高了White患者的总生存期和无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比[HR] 0.80;95%可信区间[95% cri] 0.74-0.87, p结论:在白人和亚洲患者中,抗pd -(L)1治疗不可切除/晚期非小细胞肺癌的益处相似。需要提高数据的质量和数量,才能得出可切除/局部NSCLC的明确结论,以及关于治疗线/方案和PD-L1表达的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of race on anti-PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 85 % of lung cancers, with five-year survival only 4.5 % for metastatic disease. Programmed death (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors have advanced NSCLC treatment, but patient demographics can potentially affect clinical outcomes. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to determine if the benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in NSCLC are independent of race (bio-geographic background).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and World Health Organization Global Index Medicus were systematically searched (inception-to-Aug-2024). Primary analysis focused on studies with subgroup analysis (White vs Asian, White vs Non-White, Asian vs Non-Asian) of anti-PD-(L)1 efficacy in both resectable/localized and unresectable/advanced NSCLC. Subgroup analysis included stratification by PD-L1 expression, treatment line, and treatment regimen. Bayesian inferential meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with ≥ 1 study.

Results

From 4406 records, 22 randomized controlled trials, 3 pooled analyses, and 2 pharmacokinetic studies were included. In unresectable/advanced NSCLC, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) for White (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95 % credible interval [95 % CrI] 0.74–0.87, p < 0.001 and HR 0.68; 95 % CrI 0.61–0.77, p < 0.001, respectively) and Asian (HR 0.81; 95 % CrI 0.69–0.96, p = 0.027 and HR 0.63; 95 % CrI 0.50–0.80, p = 0.002) patients. The significant improvements in PFS were maintained for both groups within all sub-analyses. Limited data prohibited conduction of meta-analysis for resectable/localized NSCLC.

Conclusions

The benefits of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in unresectable/advanced NSCLC appear similar for White and Asian patients. Increased quality and quantity of data is required to draw definitive conclusions for resectable/localized NSCLC and with respect to treatment line/regimen and PD-L1 expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信