Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Samira E M van Knippenberg, Venkat Ayyalasomayajula, Kak K Yeung, Vincent Jongkind
{"title":"鉴定未接受修复的完整腹主动脉瘤患者的临床和患者报告的结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Samira E M van Knippenberg, Venkat Ayyalasomayajula, Kak K Yeung, Vincent Jongkind","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current literature on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is characterised by heterogeneous outcome reporting and lack of standardisation. Thus, a core outcome set (COS) for patients with intact AAA not undergoing repair is being developed. The disease course in these patients is uncertain; some may progress, necessitating surgery, while others may remain stable over time. Therefore, both outcomes following conservative therapy and post-operative outcomes are important in research on AAA not undergoing repair. A systematic review identifying clinical and patient reported AAA related outcomes was conducted.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were systematically searched from 1 January 2020 until 24 November 2023.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was adhered to. The study protocol was pre-registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023478594) and Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database (study no. 2856). All studies on clinical and or patient reported outcomes on all types of AAA, including those on AAA not undergoing repair and post-operative AAA, from 2020 onwards were included. Abstract and full text screening was performed by three independent authors. Outcomes and their definitions were extracted verbatim from each article. Each outcome was harmonised into an agreed outcome term based on similarities in definitions. Agreed outcome terms were categorised into domains according to the Dodd taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5 611 articles identified through the literature search, 612 full texts were screened for eligibility and 380 studies were included. A total of 264 unique outcomes were identified. The most frequently reported outcomes were death (n = 341), myocardial infarction (n = 148), and re-intervention (n = 145). After classification into agreed outcome terms, the final longlist comprised 77 AAA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The definitive 77 item AAA outcome longlist will be used in a Delphi study to create a COS for research on intact AAA not undergoing repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes for Patients with Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Not Undergoing Repair: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Samira E M van Knippenberg, Venkat Ayyalasomayajula, Kak K Yeung, Vincent Jongkind\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current literature on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is characterised by heterogeneous outcome reporting and lack of standardisation. Thus, a core outcome set (COS) for patients with intact AAA not undergoing repair is being developed. The disease course in these patients is uncertain; some may progress, necessitating surgery, while others may remain stable over time. Therefore, both outcomes following conservative therapy and post-operative outcomes are important in research on AAA not undergoing repair. A systematic review identifying clinical and patient reported AAA related outcomes was conducted.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were systematically searched from 1 January 2020 until 24 November 2023.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was adhered to. The study protocol was pre-registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023478594) and Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database (study no. 2856). All studies on clinical and or patient reported outcomes on all types of AAA, including those on AAA not undergoing repair and post-operative AAA, from 2020 onwards were included. Abstract and full text screening was performed by three independent authors. Outcomes and their definitions were extracted verbatim from each article. Each outcome was harmonised into an agreed outcome term based on similarities in definitions. Agreed outcome terms were categorised into domains according to the Dodd taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5 611 articles identified through the literature search, 612 full texts were screened for eligibility and 380 studies were included. A total of 264 unique outcomes were identified. The most frequently reported outcomes were death (n = 341), myocardial infarction (n = 148), and re-intervention (n = 145). After classification into agreed outcome terms, the final longlist comprised 77 AAA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The definitive 77 item AAA outcome longlist will be used in a Delphi study to create a COS for research on intact AAA not undergoing repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目前关于腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)的文献的特点是结果报告不一致,缺乏标准化。因此,未进行修复的完整AAA患者的核心结局集(COS)正在开发中。这些患者的病程不确定;有些可能会进展,需要手术,而另一些可能会随着时间的推移保持稳定。因此,保守治疗后的结果和手术后的结果在未进行修复的AAA研究中都很重要。对临床和患者报告的AAA相关结果进行了系统评价。数据来源:PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)和Web of Science从2020年1月1日至2023年11月24日进行系统检索。评价方法:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册中心(CRD42023478594)和有效性试验核心结局测量(COMET)数据库(研究号为:2856)。所有关于所有类型AAA的临床和/或患者报告结果的研究,包括未进行修复的AAA和术后AAA,从2020年开始纳入。摘要和全文筛选由三位独立作者完成。结果及其定义从每篇文章中逐字摘录。根据定义的相似性,将每个结果统一为商定的结果术语。商定的结果条款根据多德分类法被划分为不同的领域。结果:在通过文献检索确定的5 611篇文章中,筛选了612篇全文,纳入了380项研究。总共确定了264个独特的结果。最常见的报告结果是死亡(n = 341)、心肌梗死(n = 148)和再干预(n = 145)。在分类为商定的结果条款后,最终的长清单包括77个AAA结果。结论:确定的77项AAA预后长表将用于Delphi研究,为未进行修复的完整AAA研究创建COS。
Identification of Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes for Patients with Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Not Undergoing Repair: A Systematic Review.
Objective: Current literature on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is characterised by heterogeneous outcome reporting and lack of standardisation. Thus, a core outcome set (COS) for patients with intact AAA not undergoing repair is being developed. The disease course in these patients is uncertain; some may progress, necessitating surgery, while others may remain stable over time. Therefore, both outcomes following conservative therapy and post-operative outcomes are important in research on AAA not undergoing repair. A systematic review identifying clinical and patient reported AAA related outcomes was conducted.
Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were systematically searched from 1 January 2020 until 24 November 2023.
Review methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was adhered to. The study protocol was pre-registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023478594) and Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database (study no. 2856). All studies on clinical and or patient reported outcomes on all types of AAA, including those on AAA not undergoing repair and post-operative AAA, from 2020 onwards were included. Abstract and full text screening was performed by three independent authors. Outcomes and their definitions were extracted verbatim from each article. Each outcome was harmonised into an agreed outcome term based on similarities in definitions. Agreed outcome terms were categorised into domains according to the Dodd taxonomy.
Results: Of the 5 611 articles identified through the literature search, 612 full texts were screened for eligibility and 380 studies were included. A total of 264 unique outcomes were identified. The most frequently reported outcomes were death (n = 341), myocardial infarction (n = 148), and re-intervention (n = 145). After classification into agreed outcome terms, the final longlist comprised 77 AAA outcomes.
Conclusion: The definitive 77 item AAA outcome longlist will be used in a Delphi study to create a COS for research on intact AAA not undergoing repair.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.