一项评估德国两个机器人外科培训课程的混合方法调查研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sjaak Pouwels, Beniamino Pascotto, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Marco Raffaelli, Antonio Albuquerque, Adel Abou-Mrad, Juan Santi Azagra, Ricardo Zorron, Jordi Tarascó, Enrique F Elli, Mario Rui Gonçalves, Miljana Vladimirov
{"title":"一项评估德国两个机器人外科培训课程的混合方法调查研究。","authors":"Sjaak Pouwels, Beniamino Pascotto, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Marco Raffaelli, Antonio Albuquerque, Adel Abou-Mrad, Juan Santi Azagra, Ricardo Zorron, Jordi Tarascó, Enrique F Elli, Mario Rui Gonçalves, Miljana Vladimirov","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02493-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite considerable efforts of several societies and robotic surgery working groups, there is still no standardized training for robotic surgery for residents. We recently organized two robotic surgical courses in Germany and the goal of this study is to evaluate both courses using a mix-method approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An anonymous survey, consisting of twenty-one questions of which seventeen were multiple choice and four were open end questions was filled out by the participants after both courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 participants were present at both courses. Most of the participants were male (29 of 34 (85.3%)), mean age was 46.4 ± 10.2 years, Among the participants, the most of them were consultant surgeons (88.2%) and worked in an Academic Hospital (58.8%). A total of 21 participants had a Robotic system in their hospital. In terms of ideal course format, 64.7% of the respondents preferred a combination of formal lectures with hands-on lab experience. For the hands-on experience 32.4% preferred either a wet lab with organic animal organ ex-plants or with human cadavers. Most important themes in the thematic analysis were duration, frequency, and costs of robotic surgical courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery is increasing worldwide and therefore adequate robotic surgical training courses are needed to train the future generations of surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-method survey study evaluating two robotic surgical training courses in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Sjaak Pouwels, Beniamino Pascotto, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Marco Raffaelli, Antonio Albuquerque, Adel Abou-Mrad, Juan Santi Azagra, Ricardo Zorron, Jordi Tarascó, Enrique F Elli, Mario Rui Gonçalves, Miljana Vladimirov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02493-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite considerable efforts of several societies and robotic surgery working groups, there is still no standardized training for robotic surgery for residents. We recently organized two robotic surgical courses in Germany and the goal of this study is to evaluate both courses using a mix-method approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An anonymous survey, consisting of twenty-one questions of which seventeen were multiple choice and four were open end questions was filled out by the participants after both courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 participants were present at both courses. Most of the participants were male (29 of 34 (85.3%)), mean age was 46.4 ± 10.2 years, Among the participants, the most of them were consultant surgeons (88.2%) and worked in an Academic Hospital (58.8%). A total of 21 participants had a Robotic system in their hospital. In terms of ideal course format, 64.7% of the respondents preferred a combination of formal lectures with hands-on lab experience. For the hands-on experience 32.4% preferred either a wet lab with organic animal organ ex-plants or with human cadavers. Most important themes in the thematic analysis were duration, frequency, and costs of robotic surgical courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery is increasing worldwide and therefore adequate robotic surgical training courses are needed to train the future generations of surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02493-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02493-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管一些学会和机器人手术工作组做出了相当大的努力,但仍没有针对住院医师的机器人手术规范化培训。我们最近在德国组织了两个机器人手术课程,本研究的目的是使用混合方法来评估这两个课程。材料与方法:一份匿名调查,包括21个问题,其中17个是选择题,4个是开放式问题,由参与者在两门课程结束后填写。结果:共有34名参与者参加了两门课程。34例患者中男性占29例(85.3%),平均年龄46.4±10.2岁,其中以会诊外科医师(88.2%)和学术医院工作医师(58.8%)居多。共有21名参与者在他们的医院里安装了机器人系统。在理想的课程形式方面,64.7%的受访者更倾向于将正式讲座与动手实验经验相结合。对于实践经验,32.4%的人更喜欢有有机动物器官移植或人类尸体的潮湿实验室。主题分析中最重要的主题是机器人手术疗程的持续时间、频率和成本。结论:机器人手术在世界范围内日益普及,因此需要足够的机器人手术培训课程来培养未来的外科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-method survey study evaluating two robotic surgical training courses in Germany.

Background: Despite considerable efforts of several societies and robotic surgery working groups, there is still no standardized training for robotic surgery for residents. We recently organized two robotic surgical courses in Germany and the goal of this study is to evaluate both courses using a mix-method approach.

Materials and methods: An anonymous survey, consisting of twenty-one questions of which seventeen were multiple choice and four were open end questions was filled out by the participants after both courses.

Results: A total of 34 participants were present at both courses. Most of the participants were male (29 of 34 (85.3%)), mean age was 46.4 ± 10.2 years, Among the participants, the most of them were consultant surgeons (88.2%) and worked in an Academic Hospital (58.8%). A total of 21 participants had a Robotic system in their hospital. In terms of ideal course format, 64.7% of the respondents preferred a combination of formal lectures with hands-on lab experience. For the hands-on experience 32.4% preferred either a wet lab with organic animal organ ex-plants or with human cadavers. Most important themes in the thematic analysis were duration, frequency, and costs of robotic surgical courses.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery is increasing worldwide and therefore adequate robotic surgical training courses are needed to train the future generations of surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信