Sabry Fayed, Moataz Badawi, Ali Basha, Mohamed Ghalla, Yahia Iskander, Saad A Yehia
{"title":"柱桩构型及尺寸对钢筋混凝土承台抗剪性能的影响","authors":"Sabry Fayed, Moataz Badawi, Ali Basha, Mohamed Ghalla, Yahia Iskander, Saad A Yehia","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05303-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite extensive research on reinforced concrete (RC) pile caps, the influence of column and pile configuration and dimensions on their shear performance remains unexplored. This study investigates the structural behavior of RC pile caps through experimental and numerical analyses, focusing on how variations in column and pile geometry affect shear capacity. Two pile cap specimens (700 mm long × 300 mm wide) with heights of 250 mm (SB1) and 350 mm (SB2) were tested under shear-dominated conditions. Both were supported by two square piles (200 × 200 mm) and loaded centrally via a square column (200 × 200 mm). The study reports crack patterns, ultimate shear load, load-displacement behavior, elastic stiffness, and energy absorption capacity. A validated 3D finite element model was developed to parametrically analyze rectangular/circular columns and piles with dimensions ranging from 0.2d to d (where d = pile cap width). The findings indicate that failure modes were consistently shear-dominated and remained unaffected by variations in column or pile configuration and size. Increasing the rectangular column length from 0.2d to d enhanced the ultimate load capacity by 108% and energy absorption by 100%. Similarly, increasing the circular column diameter from 0.2d to d improved these metrics by 348% and 373%, respectively. Widening the rectangular pile from 0.2d to d resulted in a 34% increase in ultimate load capacity. Overall, the study demonstrates that larger column and pile dimensions significantly enhance shear performance, with circular configurations yielding superior improvements. These insights offer practical guidance for optimizing pile cap design.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of column and pile configuration and dimension on shear performance of reinforced concrete pile caps.\",\"authors\":\"Sabry Fayed, Moataz Badawi, Ali Basha, Mohamed Ghalla, Yahia Iskander, Saad A Yehia\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-05303-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite extensive research on reinforced concrete (RC) pile caps, the influence of column and pile configuration and dimensions on their shear performance remains unexplored. This study investigates the structural behavior of RC pile caps through experimental and numerical analyses, focusing on how variations in column and pile geometry affect shear capacity. Two pile cap specimens (700 mm long × 300 mm wide) with heights of 250 mm (SB1) and 350 mm (SB2) were tested under shear-dominated conditions. Both were supported by two square piles (200 × 200 mm) and loaded centrally via a square column (200 × 200 mm). The study reports crack patterns, ultimate shear load, load-displacement behavior, elastic stiffness, and energy absorption capacity. A validated 3D finite element model was developed to parametrically analyze rectangular/circular columns and piles with dimensions ranging from 0.2d to d (where d = pile cap width). The findings indicate that failure modes were consistently shear-dominated and remained unaffected by variations in column or pile configuration and size. Increasing the rectangular column length from 0.2d to d enhanced the ultimate load capacity by 108% and energy absorption by 100%. Similarly, increasing the circular column diameter from 0.2d to d improved these metrics by 348% and 373%, respectively. Widening the rectangular pile from 0.2d to d resulted in a 34% increase in ultimate load capacity. Overall, the study demonstrates that larger column and pile dimensions significantly enhance shear performance, with circular configurations yielding superior improvements. These insights offer practical guidance for optimizing pile cap design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"20154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05303-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05303-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管对钢筋混凝土(RC)承台进行了广泛的研究,但柱和桩的结构和尺寸对其抗剪性能的影响仍未得到探讨。本研究通过实验和数值分析研究了RC承台的结构行为,重点研究了柱和桩几何形状的变化对抗剪能力的影响。2个桩承台试件(长700 mm ×宽300 mm),高度分别为250 mm (SB1)和350 mm (SB2),在剪切主导条件下进行试验。两者均由两根方形桩(200 × 200 mm)支撑,并通过一根方形柱(200 × 200 mm)集中加载。该研究报告了裂纹模式、极限剪切载荷、载荷-位移行为、弹性刚度和能量吸收能力。建立了一个经过验证的三维有限元模型,用于参数化分析矩形/圆形柱和桩,尺寸范围为0.2 2d至d(其中d =桩帽宽度)。研究结果表明,破坏模式始终以剪切为主,并且不受柱或桩的配置和尺寸变化的影响。将矩形柱长度从0.2d增加到d,极限承载能力提高108%,能量吸收提高100%。同样,将圆柱直径从0.2d增加到d,这些指标分别提高了348%和373%。矩形桩由0.2d加宽至d,极限承载力提高34%。总体而言,研究表明,较大的柱和桩尺寸显著提高抗剪性能,圆形结构的改善效果更好。这些见解为优化承台设计提供了实践指导。
Effect of column and pile configuration and dimension on shear performance of reinforced concrete pile caps.
Despite extensive research on reinforced concrete (RC) pile caps, the influence of column and pile configuration and dimensions on their shear performance remains unexplored. This study investigates the structural behavior of RC pile caps through experimental and numerical analyses, focusing on how variations in column and pile geometry affect shear capacity. Two pile cap specimens (700 mm long × 300 mm wide) with heights of 250 mm (SB1) and 350 mm (SB2) were tested under shear-dominated conditions. Both were supported by two square piles (200 × 200 mm) and loaded centrally via a square column (200 × 200 mm). The study reports crack patterns, ultimate shear load, load-displacement behavior, elastic stiffness, and energy absorption capacity. A validated 3D finite element model was developed to parametrically analyze rectangular/circular columns and piles with dimensions ranging from 0.2d to d (where d = pile cap width). The findings indicate that failure modes were consistently shear-dominated and remained unaffected by variations in column or pile configuration and size. Increasing the rectangular column length from 0.2d to d enhanced the ultimate load capacity by 108% and energy absorption by 100%. Similarly, increasing the circular column diameter from 0.2d to d improved these metrics by 348% and 373%, respectively. Widening the rectangular pile from 0.2d to d resulted in a 34% increase in ultimate load capacity. Overall, the study demonstrates that larger column and pile dimensions significantly enhance shear performance, with circular configurations yielding superior improvements. These insights offer practical guidance for optimizing pile cap design.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.