Ahmed Gouda Mohamed, Ali Hassan Ali, Ahmed Adel Abdelhady
{"title":"线性重复建设项目中优化时间和成本权衡的集成决策支持系统。","authors":"Ahmed Gouda Mohamed, Ali Hassan Ali, Ahmed Adel Abdelhady","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear repetitive construction projects present unique challenges in optimizing both completion time and cost performance. Traditional scheduling techniques often struggle to effectively address these complexities. This paper aims to enhance project optimization by introducing a metaheuristic-based Time-Cost Trade-off (TCT) framework specifically designed for repetitive project environments. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on single-algorithm applications, this research evaluates two metaheuristic optimization strategies-Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-within a consistent problem setting. The framework employs both algorithms, which are independently assessed for their effectiveness in tackling the Linear Repetitive Project Time-Cost Trade-off (LRPTCT) problem. The methodology utilizes task decomposition alongside the Line of Balance (LOB) scheduling technique, facilitating a more detailed and adaptable planning process. Each sub-task is systematically evaluated to identify the optimal construction method based on cost-time trade-offs, with scheduling constraints integrated into the fitness functions of both GA and PSO. Results from an in-depth case study reveal significant improvements in project efficiency. Specifically, GA achieved approximately a 3.25% reduction in direct costs, a 20% reduction in indirect costs, and a 7% reduction in total construction costs. In comparison, PSO demonstrated slightly superior cost performance, with a 4% reduction in direct costs and comparable reductions in indirect costs, along with a 20% decrease in total project duration. These findings highlight practical gains in resource utilization and scheduling efficiency. This study presents a structured, comparative analysis of GA and PSO within the LOB-based TCT framework, providing a replicable methodology for optimizing schedules in linear repetitive projects. By bridging the gap between traditional scheduling techniques and advanced optimization algorithms, this research contributes valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency and informed decision-making in construction project management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated decision support system for optimizing time and cost trade offs in linear repetitive construction projects.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Gouda Mohamed, Ali Hassan Ali, Ahmed Adel Abdelhady\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Linear repetitive construction projects present unique challenges in optimizing both completion time and cost performance. Traditional scheduling techniques often struggle to effectively address these complexities. This paper aims to enhance project optimization by introducing a metaheuristic-based Time-Cost Trade-off (TCT) framework specifically designed for repetitive project environments. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on single-algorithm applications, this research evaluates two metaheuristic optimization strategies-Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-within a consistent problem setting. The framework employs both algorithms, which are independently assessed for their effectiveness in tackling the Linear Repetitive Project Time-Cost Trade-off (LRPTCT) problem. The methodology utilizes task decomposition alongside the Line of Balance (LOB) scheduling technique, facilitating a more detailed and adaptable planning process. Each sub-task is systematically evaluated to identify the optimal construction method based on cost-time trade-offs, with scheduling constraints integrated into the fitness functions of both GA and PSO. Results from an in-depth case study reveal significant improvements in project efficiency. Specifically, GA achieved approximately a 3.25% reduction in direct costs, a 20% reduction in indirect costs, and a 7% reduction in total construction costs. In comparison, PSO demonstrated slightly superior cost performance, with a 4% reduction in direct costs and comparable reductions in indirect costs, along with a 20% decrease in total project duration. These findings highlight practical gains in resource utilization and scheduling efficiency. This study presents a structured, comparative analysis of GA and PSO within the LOB-based TCT framework, providing a replicable methodology for optimizing schedules in linear repetitive projects. By bridging the gap between traditional scheduling techniques and advanced optimization algorithms, this research contributes valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency and informed decision-making in construction project management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"20099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181440/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated decision support system for optimizing time and cost trade offs in linear repetitive construction projects.
Linear repetitive construction projects present unique challenges in optimizing both completion time and cost performance. Traditional scheduling techniques often struggle to effectively address these complexities. This paper aims to enhance project optimization by introducing a metaheuristic-based Time-Cost Trade-off (TCT) framework specifically designed for repetitive project environments. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on single-algorithm applications, this research evaluates two metaheuristic optimization strategies-Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-within a consistent problem setting. The framework employs both algorithms, which are independently assessed for their effectiveness in tackling the Linear Repetitive Project Time-Cost Trade-off (LRPTCT) problem. The methodology utilizes task decomposition alongside the Line of Balance (LOB) scheduling technique, facilitating a more detailed and adaptable planning process. Each sub-task is systematically evaluated to identify the optimal construction method based on cost-time trade-offs, with scheduling constraints integrated into the fitness functions of both GA and PSO. Results from an in-depth case study reveal significant improvements in project efficiency. Specifically, GA achieved approximately a 3.25% reduction in direct costs, a 20% reduction in indirect costs, and a 7% reduction in total construction costs. In comparison, PSO demonstrated slightly superior cost performance, with a 4% reduction in direct costs and comparable reductions in indirect costs, along with a 20% decrease in total project duration. These findings highlight practical gains in resource utilization and scheduling efficiency. This study presents a structured, comparative analysis of GA and PSO within the LOB-based TCT framework, providing a replicable methodology for optimizing schedules in linear repetitive projects. By bridging the gap between traditional scheduling techniques and advanced optimization algorithms, this research contributes valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency and informed decision-making in construction project management.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.