{"title":"利奈唑胺相关低钠血症的危险因素集中在静脉和口服给药之间的差异:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Ryoji Takata, Masatoshi Taga, Hirofumi Nagai, Yoshihiro Nishita, Hironori Kobayashi, Nozomi Arakawa, Toru Imai, Yoshitsugu Iinuma, Togen Masauji","doi":"10.1186/s40780-025-00463-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Linezolid (LZD)-associated hyponatremia is a rare side effect, and no reports have compared intravenous and oral administration in relation to the development of hyponatremia. This study aimed to identify risk factors for LZD-associated hyponatremia and to evaluate whether there are differences in the development of hyponatremia between intravenous and oral administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study that included patients aged ≥ 20 years who received LZD of 1200 mg/day intravenously or orally at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023. Patient information was retrospectively examined, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of intravenous administration for hyponatremia. Additionally, propensity scores were calculated for the intravenous and oral administration groups, and these scores were subsequently used in a propensity score matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study revealed hyponatremia in 32 of 240 (13.3%) patients. Intravenous administration (OR = 17.137, 95% CI = 2.029-144.712, P = 0.009), serum sodium level before administration (OR = 0.626, 95% CI = 0.528-0.744, P < 0.001), and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.987, 95% CI = 0.975-0.999, P = 0.040) were identified as independent variables associated with hyponatremia. After propensity score matching, the incidence of LZD-associated hyponatremia was higher with intravenous administration than with oral administration (OR = 9.697, 95% CI = 1.153-81.545, P = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified intravenous administration as an independent risk factor for LZD-associated hyponatremia, and that the risk of hyponatremia was significantly higher with the intravenous administration compared with the oral administration. Patients with the identified risk factors should be administered intravenous LZD more cautiously and carefully monitored for serum sodium levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for linezolid-associated hyponatremia focused on differences between intravenous and oral administration: a single-center, retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryoji Takata, Masatoshi Taga, Hirofumi Nagai, Yoshihiro Nishita, Hironori Kobayashi, Nozomi Arakawa, Toru Imai, Yoshitsugu Iinuma, Togen Masauji\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40780-025-00463-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Linezolid (LZD)-associated hyponatremia is a rare side effect, and no reports have compared intravenous and oral administration in relation to the development of hyponatremia. This study aimed to identify risk factors for LZD-associated hyponatremia and to evaluate whether there are differences in the development of hyponatremia between intravenous and oral administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study that included patients aged ≥ 20 years who received LZD of 1200 mg/day intravenously or orally at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023. Patient information was retrospectively examined, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of intravenous administration for hyponatremia. Additionally, propensity scores were calculated for the intravenous and oral administration groups, and these scores were subsequently used in a propensity score matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study revealed hyponatremia in 32 of 240 (13.3%) patients. Intravenous administration (OR = 17.137, 95% CI = 2.029-144.712, P = 0.009), serum sodium level before administration (OR = 0.626, 95% CI = 0.528-0.744, P < 0.001), and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.987, 95% CI = 0.975-0.999, P = 0.040) were identified as independent variables associated with hyponatremia. After propensity score matching, the incidence of LZD-associated hyponatremia was higher with intravenous administration than with oral administration (OR = 9.697, 95% CI = 1.153-81.545, P = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified intravenous administration as an independent risk factor for LZD-associated hyponatremia, and that the risk of hyponatremia was significantly higher with the intravenous administration compared with the oral administration. Patients with the identified risk factors should be administered intravenous LZD more cautiously and carefully monitored for serum sodium levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00463-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00463-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:利奈唑胺(LZD)相关的低钠血症是一种罕见的副作用,没有报道比较静脉和口服给药与低钠血症发展的关系。本研究旨在确定lzd相关低钠血症的危险因素,并评估静脉和口服给药在低钠血症的发展方面是否存在差异。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了2011年1月至2023年12月在金泽医科大学医院静脉或口服LZD 1200mg /天的年龄≥20岁的患者。回顾性检查患者信息,并采用多元logistic回归分析来评估静脉给药治疗低钠血症的风险。此外,计算静脉和口服给药组的倾向得分,这些得分随后用于倾向得分匹配分析。结果:本回顾性研究显示240例患者中有32例(13.3%)患有低钠血症。静脉给药(OR = 17.137, 95% CI = 2.029-144.712, P = 0.009)、给药前血清钠水平(OR = 0.626, 95% CI = 0.528-0.744, P)。结论:本研究确定静脉给药是lzd相关低钠血症的独立危险因素,且静脉给药发生低钠血症的风险明显高于口服给药。有确定危险因素的患者应更谨慎地静脉注射LZD,并仔细监测血清钠水平。
Risk factors for linezolid-associated hyponatremia focused on differences between intravenous and oral administration: a single-center, retrospective study.
Background: Linezolid (LZD)-associated hyponatremia is a rare side effect, and no reports have compared intravenous and oral administration in relation to the development of hyponatremia. This study aimed to identify risk factors for LZD-associated hyponatremia and to evaluate whether there are differences in the development of hyponatremia between intravenous and oral administration.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included patients aged ≥ 20 years who received LZD of 1200 mg/day intravenously or orally at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023. Patient information was retrospectively examined, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of intravenous administration for hyponatremia. Additionally, propensity scores were calculated for the intravenous and oral administration groups, and these scores were subsequently used in a propensity score matching analysis.
Results: This retrospective study revealed hyponatremia in 32 of 240 (13.3%) patients. Intravenous administration (OR = 17.137, 95% CI = 2.029-144.712, P = 0.009), serum sodium level before administration (OR = 0.626, 95% CI = 0.528-0.744, P < 0.001), and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.987, 95% CI = 0.975-0.999, P = 0.040) were identified as independent variables associated with hyponatremia. After propensity score matching, the incidence of LZD-associated hyponatremia was higher with intravenous administration than with oral administration (OR = 9.697, 95% CI = 1.153-81.545, P = 0.029).
Conclusions: This study identified intravenous administration as an independent risk factor for LZD-associated hyponatremia, and that the risk of hyponatremia was significantly higher with the intravenous administration compared with the oral administration. Patients with the identified risk factors should be administered intravenous LZD more cautiously and carefully monitored for serum sodium levels.