Nikita I. Golushko , Daniil Matrynov , David S. Galstyan , Kirill V. Apukhtin , Murilo S. de Abreu , Longen Yang , Adam Michael Stewart , Allan V. Kalueff
{"title":"理解(和欣赏)斑马鱼的行为复杂性的新水箱试验。","authors":"Nikita I. Golushko , Daniil Matrynov , David S. Galstyan , Kirill V. Apukhtin , Murilo S. de Abreu , Longen Yang , Adam Michael Stewart , Allan V. Kalueff","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Zebrafish are rapidly becoming an important model organism in neurobehavioral research. The novel tank diving test is commonly used for assessing locomotor, anxiety-related and other behaviors in adult zebrafish. Assessing characteristic neophobic bottom preference, erratic movements and freezing/immobility behavior, the test represents a fast, easy-to-perform, single-trial novelty-based assay sensitive to pharmacological, genetic and environmental manipulations. Here, we critically evaluate key behavioral parameters in the novel tank test, and multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect the assessment of fish behavioral phenotypes, including habituation, homebase, social behaviors, stress responses, novelty/familiarity and personality traits. We also discuss the value of this assay for modeling a broad spectrum of brain phenomena, including generalized anxiety, fear, panic-like, post-traumatic stress- and depression-like behavior. Overall, the emerging behavioral complexity of the novel tank test extends beyond the traditional dichotomic conflict between fear and exploration, likely reflecting multiple overlapping neurobehavioral domains in zebrafish.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 105230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding (and appreciating) behavioral complexity of zebrafish novel tank assays\",\"authors\":\"Nikita I. Golushko , Daniil Matrynov , David S. Galstyan , Kirill V. Apukhtin , Murilo S. de Abreu , Longen Yang , Adam Michael Stewart , Allan V. Kalueff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Zebrafish are rapidly becoming an important model organism in neurobehavioral research. The novel tank diving test is commonly used for assessing locomotor, anxiety-related and other behaviors in adult zebrafish. Assessing characteristic neophobic bottom preference, erratic movements and freezing/immobility behavior, the test represents a fast, easy-to-perform, single-trial novelty-based assay sensitive to pharmacological, genetic and environmental manipulations. Here, we critically evaluate key behavioral parameters in the novel tank test, and multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect the assessment of fish behavioral phenotypes, including habituation, homebase, social behaviors, stress responses, novelty/familiarity and personality traits. We also discuss the value of this assay for modeling a broad spectrum of brain phenomena, including generalized anxiety, fear, panic-like, post-traumatic stress- and depression-like behavior. Overall, the emerging behavioral complexity of the novel tank test extends beyond the traditional dichotomic conflict between fear and exploration, likely reflecting multiple overlapping neurobehavioral domains in zebrafish.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding (and appreciating) behavioral complexity of zebrafish novel tank assays
Zebrafish are rapidly becoming an important model organism in neurobehavioral research. The novel tank diving test is commonly used for assessing locomotor, anxiety-related and other behaviors in adult zebrafish. Assessing characteristic neophobic bottom preference, erratic movements and freezing/immobility behavior, the test represents a fast, easy-to-perform, single-trial novelty-based assay sensitive to pharmacological, genetic and environmental manipulations. Here, we critically evaluate key behavioral parameters in the novel tank test, and multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect the assessment of fish behavioral phenotypes, including habituation, homebase, social behaviors, stress responses, novelty/familiarity and personality traits. We also discuss the value of this assay for modeling a broad spectrum of brain phenomena, including generalized anxiety, fear, panic-like, post-traumatic stress- and depression-like behavior. Overall, the emerging behavioral complexity of the novel tank test extends beyond the traditional dichotomic conflict between fear and exploration, likely reflecting multiple overlapping neurobehavioral domains in zebrafish.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.