医院类型(公立与私立)对中风后死亡率和生存率的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809418
Carla Heloisa Cabral Moro, Maria Izabel Rodrigues Mendes, Milena Veiga Wiggers, Thaís de Faria Cardoso, Henrique Diegoli, Luciano Henrique Pinto, Helbert do Nascimento Lima
{"title":"医院类型(公立与私立)对中风后死亡率和生存率的影响。","authors":"Carla Heloisa Cabral Moro, Maria Izabel Rodrigues Mendes, Milena Veiga Wiggers, Thaís de Faria Cardoso, Henrique Diegoli, Luciano Henrique Pinto, Helbert do Nascimento Lima","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke has been a leading cause of death in Brazil throughout the past three decades. Although several cities in the country have implemented urgent/emergency stroke care units, the impact of the hospital type (public versus private) has not been evaluated.To compare the mortality and survival of patients admitted with stroke to two private hospitals without stroke units with a public hospital with a stroke unit.We conducted a historical cohort in the city of Joinville, Southern Brazil. Stroke patients admitted to a public hospital with a stroke unit were compared with those admitted to private hospitals without stroke units in terms of fatality rate and 30-day survival between January 2018 and December 2020. The Cox regression was used.Of the 4,508 patients, 85.6% were from public hospital, and 14.4%, from the 2 private hospitals. The crude mortality rate was of 11.4% among the public hospital patients, and of 9.1% among the patients from the private hospitals (<i>p</i> = 0.085). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in mortality between patients treated in the public hospital with a stroke unit (hazard ratio = 1.21; 95%CI: 0.87-1.68; <i>p</i> = 0.262) and those admitted to the 2 private hospitals without a stroke unit.Stroke units are an important public policy that minimizes the impact of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 6","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of hospital type (public versus private) on mortality and survival after stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Heloisa Cabral Moro, Maria Izabel Rodrigues Mendes, Milena Veiga Wiggers, Thaís de Faria Cardoso, Henrique Diegoli, Luciano Henrique Pinto, Helbert do Nascimento Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1809418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stroke has been a leading cause of death in Brazil throughout the past three decades. Although several cities in the country have implemented urgent/emergency stroke care units, the impact of the hospital type (public versus private) has not been evaluated.To compare the mortality and survival of patients admitted with stroke to two private hospitals without stroke units with a public hospital with a stroke unit.We conducted a historical cohort in the city of Joinville, Southern Brazil. Stroke patients admitted to a public hospital with a stroke unit were compared with those admitted to private hospitals without stroke units in terms of fatality rate and 30-day survival between January 2018 and December 2020. The Cox regression was used.Of the 4,508 patients, 85.6% were from public hospital, and 14.4%, from the 2 private hospitals. The crude mortality rate was of 11.4% among the public hospital patients, and of 9.1% among the patients from the private hospitals (<i>p</i> = 0.085). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in mortality between patients treated in the public hospital with a stroke unit (hazard ratio = 1.21; 95%CI: 0.87-1.68; <i>p</i> = 0.262) and those admitted to the 2 private hospitals without a stroke unit.Stroke units are an important public policy that minimizes the impact of stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"83 6\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三十年里,中风一直是巴西的主要死亡原因。尽管该国几个城市已经设立了紧急/紧急中风护理单位,但尚未对医院类型(公立与私立)的影响进行评估。比较两家不设脑卒中科室的私立医院与设有脑卒中科室的公立医院收治的脑卒中患者的死亡率和生存率。我们在巴西南部的若因维尔市进行了一项历史队列研究。在2018年1月至2020年12月期间,将在设有卒中科室的公立医院住院的卒中患者与在没有卒中科室的私立医院住院的卒中患者进行病死率和30天生存率的比较。采用Cox回归分析。在4508名患者中,85.6%来自公立医院,14.4%来自两所私立医院。公立医院患者的粗死亡率为11.4%,私立医院患者的粗死亡率为9.1% (p = 0.085)。在多因素分析中,公立医院与卒中单位治疗的患者死亡率无差异(风险比= 1.21;95%置信区间:0.87—-1.68;P = 0.262)和在两家没有卒中科室的私立医院住院的患者。卒中单位是一项重要的公共政策,可以最大限度地减少卒中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of hospital type (public versus private) on mortality and survival after stroke.

Stroke has been a leading cause of death in Brazil throughout the past three decades. Although several cities in the country have implemented urgent/emergency stroke care units, the impact of the hospital type (public versus private) has not been evaluated.To compare the mortality and survival of patients admitted with stroke to two private hospitals without stroke units with a public hospital with a stroke unit.We conducted a historical cohort in the city of Joinville, Southern Brazil. Stroke patients admitted to a public hospital with a stroke unit were compared with those admitted to private hospitals without stroke units in terms of fatality rate and 30-day survival between January 2018 and December 2020. The Cox regression was used.Of the 4,508 patients, 85.6% were from public hospital, and 14.4%, from the 2 private hospitals. The crude mortality rate was of 11.4% among the public hospital patients, and of 9.1% among the patients from the private hospitals (p = 0.085). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in mortality between patients treated in the public hospital with a stroke unit (hazard ratio = 1.21; 95%CI: 0.87-1.68; p = 0.262) and those admitted to the 2 private hospitals without a stroke unit.Stroke units are an important public policy that minimizes the impact of stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信